Customised versus population-based growth charts as a screening tool for detecting small for gestational age infants in low-risk pregnant women

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2011, Issue 12, 2011, Pages

  Carberry, Angela E ^b   Gordon, Adrienne ^a   Bond, Diana M ^a   Hyett, Jon ^a   Raynes Greenow, Camille H ^c   Jeffery, Heather E ^b  

^a ROYAL PRINCE ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY WEIGHT; ETHNICITY; FETUS GROWTH; GROWTH CURVE; HUMAN; LOW RISK PATIENT; PARITY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SCREENING; SMALL FOR DATE INFANT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; FEMALE; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION; NEWBORN; PREGNANCY; REVIEW;

FEMALE; FETAL GROWTH RETARDATION; GROWTH CHARTS; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, SMALL FOR GESTATIONAL AGE; PREGNANCY;

EID: 84856259570     PISSN: 14651858     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008549.pub2     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Gardosi J, Francis A. Controlled trial of fundal height measurement plotted on customised antenatal growth charts. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1999; 106(4):309-17.
2. Barker DJ. The developmental origins of adult disease. Journal of the American College of Nutrition 2004;23(6 Suppl):588S-595S.
3. Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Hod M, Bar J. Predictive value of a single early fetal weight estimate in normal pregnancies. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2007;130:187-92.
4. Bricker L, Neilson JP, Dowswell T. Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks' gestation). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001451.pub3]
5. Clausson B, Gardosi J, Francis A, Cnattingius S. Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2001;108: 830-4.
6. Clayton PE, Cianfarani S, Czernichow P, Johannsson G, Rapaport R, Rogol A. Consensus statement: management of the child born small for gestational age through to adulthood: a consensus statement of the International Societies of Pediatric Endocrinology and the Growth Hormone Research Society. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 2007;92(3):804-10.
7. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315(7109):629-34.
8. Figueras F, Figueras J, Meler E, Eixarch E, Coll O, Gratacos E, et al.Customised birthweight standards accurately predict perinatal morbidity. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2007;92:F277-F280.
9. Gardosi J, Chang, A, Kalyan B, Sahota D, Symonds EM. Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet 1992;339: 283-7.
10. Gelbaya TA, Nardo LG. Customised fetal growth chart: a systematic review. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2005;25(5):445-50.
11. Grivell RM, Wong L, Bhatia V. Regimens of fetal surveillance for impaired fetal growth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007113.pub2]
12. Harbord RM, Egger M, Sterne JA. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Statistics in Medicine 2006;25(20): 3443-57.
13. Hepburn M, Rosenberg K. An audit of the detection and management of small-for-gestational age babies. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1986;93:212-6.
14. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
15. Japaraj RP, Ho JJ, Valliapan J, Sivasangari S. Symphysial fundal height measurement (SFH) in pregnancy for detecting abnormal fetal growth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008136]
16. Jelks A, Cifuentes R, RossM. Clinician bias in fundal height measurement. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2007;110(4):892-9.
17. Kean LH, Liu DT. Antenatal care as a screening tool for the detection of small for gestational age babies in the low risk population. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1996;16 (2):77-82.
18. Maulik D. Management of fetal growth restriction: an evidence-based approach. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2006;49(2):320-34.
19. Mongelli M, Figueras F, Francis A, Gardosi J. A customised birthweight centile calculator developed for an Australian population. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2007;47(2):128-31.
20. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.1. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
21. Stuart JM, Healy TJ, Sutton M, Swingler GR. Symphysisfundus measurements in screening for small-for-dates infants: a community based study in Gloucestershire. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 1989;39: 45-8.
22. Wright J, Morse K, Kady S, Francis A. Audit of fundal height measurement plotted on customised growth charts. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 2006;16(3):341-5.