Customized versus population approach for evaluation of fetal overgrowth

American Journal of Perinatology

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 565-572

  Costantine, Magedm ^a   Mele, Lisa ^b   Landon, Markb ^c   Spong, Catheriney ^d   Ramin, Susanm ^e   Casey, Brian ^f   Wapner, Ronaldj ^g   Varner, Michaelw ^h   Rouse, Dwightj ⁱ   Thorp, Johnm ^j   Sciscione, Anthony ^k   Catalano, Patrick ^l   Caritis, Steven ^m   Sorokin, Yoram ⁿ   Peaceman, Alanm ^o   Tolosa, Jorgee ^p   Anderson, Garlandd ^a  

^a University of Texas Medical Branch School of Medicine   (United States)

^b GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^g Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^k DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^l METROHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^m UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

ⁿ WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^o NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^p OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

adverse neonatal outcomes; customized growth; gestational diabetes; large for gestational age

Indexed keywords

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ETHNICITY; FETUS GROWTH; FETUS OUTCOME; FETUS OVERGROWTH; HUMAN; HYPERBILIRUBINEMIA; HYPERINSULINEMIA; HYPOGLYCEMIA; LARGE FOR GESTATIONAL AGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEWBORN; NEWBORN ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POPULATION RESEARCH; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SECONDARY ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AREA UNDER CURVE; BIRTH WEIGHT; BLOOD GLUCOSE; C-PEPTIDE; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DIABETES, GESTATIONAL; FEMALE; FETAL MACROSOMIA; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; HYPERBILIRUBINEMIA, NEONATAL; HYPERINSULINISM; HYPOGLYCEMIA; INFANT, NEWBORN; ODDS RATIO; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; REFERENCE VALUES; ROC CURVE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84880330415     PISSN: 07351631     EISSN: 10988785     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329188     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. McIntire D. D., Bloom S. L., Casey B. M., Leveno K. J. Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. N Engl J Med: 1999; 340 1234 1238 (Pubitemid 29181643)
2. Schoendorf K. C., Hogue C. J., Kleinman J. C., Rowley D. Mortality among infants of black as compared with white college-educated parents. N Engl J Med: 1992; 326 1522 1526
3. Kajantie E., Osmond C., Barker D. J., Forsén T., Phillips D. I., Eriksson J. G. Size at birth as a predictor of mortality in adulthood: a follow-up of 350 000 person-years. Int J Epidemiol: 2005; 34 655 663 (Pubitemid 40852583)
4. Esakoff T. F., Cheng Y. W., Sparks T. N., Caughey A. B. The association between birthweight 4000 g or greater and perinatal outcomes in patients with and without gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2009; 200 672, e1-e4
5. Ozanne S. E., Fernandez-Twinn D., Hales C. N. Fetal growth and adult diseases. Semin Perinatol: 2004; 28 81 87 (Pubitemid 38298832)
6. Alexander G. R., Kogan M. D., Himes J. H. 1994-1996 U.S. singleton birth weight percentiles for gestational age by race, Hispanic origin, and gender. Matern Child Health J: 1999; 3 225 231
7. Alexander G. R., Himes J. H., Kaufman R. B., Mor J., Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol: 1996; 87 163 168 (Pubitemid 26033124)
8. Hadlock F. P., Harrist R. B., Martinez-Poyer J. In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology: 1991; 181 129 133
9. Reeves S., Bernstein I. M. Optimal growth modeling. Semin Perinatol: 2008; 32 148 153 (Pubitemid 351637626)
10. Gardosi J. Customized fetal growth standards: rationale and clinical application. Semin Perinatol: 2004; 28 33 40 (Pubitemid 38298827)
11. Gardosi J., Mongelli M., Wilcox M., Chang A. An adjustable fetal weight standard. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol: 1995; 6 168 174
12. Gardosi J., Francis A. A customized standard to assess fetal growth in a US population. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2009; 201 25, e1-e7
13. GROW Gestation Network. Gestation Related Optimal Weight. Customised growth chart software versions 5.x-7.x, 2000-2009. Available at: www.gestation.net. Accessed December 12, 2009
14. de Jong C. L., Gardosi J., Dekker G. A., Colenbrander G. J., van Geijn H. P. Application of a customised birthweight standard in the assessment of perinatal outcome in a high risk population. Br J Obstet Gynaecol: 1998; 105 531 535 (Pubitemid 28261384)
15. Clausson B., Gardosi J., Francis A., Cnattingius S. Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards. BJOG: 2001; 108 830 834 (Pubitemid 32695316)
16. McCowan L. M., Harding J. E., Stewart A. W. Customized birthweight centiles predict SGA pregnancies with perinatal morbidity. BJOG: 2005; 112 1026 1033 (Pubitemid 41632654)
17. Mongelli M., Gardosi J. Reduction of false-positive diagnosis of fetal growth restriction by application of customized fetal growth standards. Obstet Gynecol: 1996; 88 844 848 (Pubitemid 26360830)
18. Gardosi J., Francis A. Adverse pregnancy outcome and association with small for gestational age birthweight by customized and population-based percentiles. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2009; 201 28, e1-e8
19. Mongelli M., Wilcox M., Gardosi J. Estimating the date of confinement: ultrasonographic biometry versus certain menstrual dates. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 1996; 174 1 Pt 1 278 281 (Pubitemid 26037724)
20. Ego A., Subtil D., Grange G., et al. Customized versus population-based birth weight standards for identifying growth restricted infants: a French multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2006; 194 1042 1049
21. Jacobsson B., Ahlin K., Francis A., Hagberg G., Hagberg H., Gardosi J. Cerebral palsy and restricted growth status at birth: population-based case-control study. BJOG: 2008; 115 1250 1255
22. Landon M. B., Spong C. Y., Thom E., et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network A multicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med: 2009; 361 1339 1348
23. McNEMAR Q. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika: 1947; 12 153 157
24. DeLong E. R., DeLong D. M., Clarke-Pearson D. L. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics: 1988; 44 837 845
25. Wilcox M., Gardosi J., Mongelli M., Ray C., Johnson I. Birth weight from pregnancies dated by ultrasonography in a multicultural British population. BMJ: 1993; 307 588 591 (Pubitemid 23255063)
26. Figueras F., Gardosi J. Should we customize fetal growth standards? Fetal Diagn Ther: 2009; 25 297 303
27. Bukowski R., Uchida T., Smith G. C., et al. First and Second Trimester Evaluation of Risk (FASTER) Research Consortium Individualized norms of optimal fetal growth: fetal growth potential. Obstet Gynecol: 2008; 111 1065 1076 (Pubitemid 351620339)
28. Morrison J., Williams G. M., Najman J. M., Andersen M. J. The influence of paternal height and weight on birth-weight. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol: 1991; 31 114 116
29. Larkin J. C., Speer P. D., Simhan H. N. A customized standard of large size for gestational age to predict intrapartum morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2011; 204 499, e1-e10
30. Hutcheon J. A., Zhang X., Platt R. W., Cnattingius S., Kramer M. S. The case against customised birthweight standards. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol: 2011; 25 11 16
31. Hutcheon J. A., Zhang X., Cnattingius S., Kramer M. S., Platt R. W. Customised birthweight percentiles: does adjusting for maternal characteristics matter? BJOG: 2008; 115 1397 1404
32. Catalano P. M., Thomas A. J., Avallone D. A., Amini S. B. Anthropometric estimation of neonatal body composition. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 1995; 173 1176 1181