Multi-sensor information fusion for fault detection in aircraft gas turbine engines

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering

Volumn 227, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 1988-2001

  Sarkar, Soumik ^a   Sarkar, Soumalya ^b   Mukherjee, Kushal ^c   Ray, Asok ^b   Srivastav, Abhishek ^d  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

^c Penrose Wharf   (Ireland)

^d UNITED TECHNOLOGIES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Fault detection; Gas turbine engines; Information fusion

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT GAS TURBINE ENGINES; COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT; CONTROL STRUCTURE; HIERARCHICAL DECISIONS; MULTI-SENSOR INFORMATION FUSION; NATURAL DEGRADATION; SIMULATION TEST BEDS; SYMBOLIC DYNAMIC FILTERING;

AIRCRAFT; AIRCRAFT ENGINES; EQUIPMENT TESTING; FAULT DETECTION; INFORMATION FUSION; NASA; SENSORS;

GAS TURBINES;

EID: 84885595059     PISSN: 09544100     EISSN: 20413025     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0954410012468391     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Frederick DK, DeCastro JA and Litt JS. UserŠs guide for the commercial modular aero-propulsion system simulation (C-MAPSS). NASA/TM-2007- 215026, October, 2007.
2. Saxena A, Celaya J, Balaban E, et al. Metrics for evaluating performance of prognostic techniques. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (PHM08). Denver, CO, USA, 2008, pp.1-17.
3. Ray A. Symbolic dynamic analysis of complex systems for anomaly detection. Signal Process 2004; 84(7): 1115-1130.
4. Jin X, Gupta S, Mukherjee K, et al. Wavwlet-based feature extraction using probabilistic finite state automata for pattern classification. Pattern Recogn 2011; 44(7): 1343-1356.
5. Rajagopalan V and Ray A. Symbolic time series analysis via wavelet-based partitioning. Signal Process 2006; 86(11): 3309-3320.
6. Gupta S, Ray A and Keller E. Symbolic time series analysis of ultrasonic data for early detection of fatigue damage. Mech Syst Signal Process 2007; 21(2): 866-884.
7. Rao C, Ray A, Sarkar S, et al. Review and comparative evaluation of symbolic dynamic filtering for detection of anomaly patterns. Signal, Image Video Process 2009; 3(2): 101-114.
8. Gupta S, Ray A, Sarkar S, et al. Fault detection and isolation in aircraft gas turbine engines: Part i - underlying concept. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2008; 222(3): 307-318.
9. Sarkar S, Yasar M, Gupta S, et al. Fault detection and isolation in aircraft gas turbine engines: Part II - validation on a simulation test bed. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2008; 222(3): 319-330.
10. Sarkar S, Rao C and Ray A. Statistical estimation of multiple faults in aircraft gas turbine engines. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2009; 223(4): 415-424.
11. Sarkar S, Mukherjee K, Jin X, et al. Optimization of symbolic feature extraction for pattern classification. Signal Process 2012; 92(3): 625-635.
12. Basir O and Yuan X. Engine fault diagnosis based on multi-sensor information fusion using dempsterU′ shafer evidence theory. Inform Fusion 2007; 8: 379-386.
13. Romessis C and Mathioudakis K. Bayesian network approach for gas path fault diagnosis. J Eng Gas Turb Power 2006; 128: 64-72.
14. Volponi A, Brotherton T, Luppold R, et al. Development of an information fusion system for engine diagnostics and health management. In: NASA/TM2004-212924, 39th Combustion/21th Airbreathing Propulsion/21st Propulsion Systems Hazards/ 3rd Modeling and Simulation Joint Subcommittee Meeting. Colorado Springs, CO, USA, 1-5 December, 2003.
15. Byington C, Watson M and Edwards D. Data-driven neural network methodology to remaining life predictions for aircraft actuator components. In: Proceedings of IEEE Aerospace Conference. Big Sky, MT, USA, March, 2004.
16. Kobayashi T and Simon DL. A hybrid neural networkgenetic algorithm technique for aircraft engine performance diagnostics. In: 37th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit cosponsored by the AIAA, ASME, SAE and ASEE. Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2001.
17. Chu E, Gorinevsky D and Boyd S. Detecting aircraft performance anomalies from cruise flight data. In: AIAA Infotech Aerospace Conference. Atlanta, GA, USA, April 2010.
18. Armstrong J. Users guide for the transient test case generator. NASA GRC Internal Report, September 2009.
19. Simon D and Garg S. Optimal tuner selection for Kalman filter-based aircraft engine performance estimation. J Eng Gas Turb Power 2010; 132(3): 031601.
20. Blasch E, Kadar I, Hintz K, et al. Resource managemanet coordination with level 2/3 fusion issues and challenges. IEEE A&E Sytems Magazine, March 2008, pp. 32-46.
21. Subbu A and Ray A. Space partitioning via hilbert transform for symbolic time series analysis. Appl Phys Lett 2008; 92(8): 084107-1-084107-3.
22. Bishop CM. Pattern recognition and machine learning (Information science and statistics). Secaucus, NJ: Springer-Verlag, 2006.
23. Duda R, Hart P and Stork D. Pattern classification. New York, NY: John Wiley, 2001.
24. McLachlan GJ. Discriminant analysis and statistical pattern recognition. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience, 2004.
25. Choi E and Lee C. Feature extraction based on the Bhattacharyya distance. Pattern Recogn 2003; 36: 1703-1709.
26. Trivedi P and Zimmer D. Copula modeling: An introduction for practitioners. Foundations Trend Econom 2005; 1(1): 1-111.