Conflicts of interest at the european food safety authority erode public confidence

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Volumn 67, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 717-720

  Robinson, Claire ^a   Holland, Nina ^b   Leloup, David ^b   Muilerman, Hans ^c  

^a Earth Open Source   (United Kingdom)

^b Corporate Europe Observatory ^*  (Belgium)

^c Pesticide Action Network Europe   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FOOD SAFETY; GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM; HEALTH CARE; MAIZE; SOCIAL POLICY; TOXICOLOGY;

ARTICLE; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DECISION MAKING PR; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; ETHICS; EUROPE; FOOD SAFETY; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; POLICY; PUBLIC OPINION; TRUST;

DECISION MAKING PR; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; ETHICS; HEALTH POLICY; POLICY;

CONFLICT OF INTEREST; EUROPE; FOOD SAFETY; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMANS; PUBLIC OPINION; TRUST;

EUROPE;

EID: 84885379538     PISSN: 0143005X     EISSN: 14702738     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jech-2012-202185     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Séralini GE, Clair E, Mesnage R, et al. Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize. Food Chem Toxicol 2012;50:4221-31.
2. Hammond B, Dudek R, Lemen J, et al. Results of a week safety assurance study with rats fed grain from glyphosate tolerant corn. Food Chem Toxicol 2004;42:1003-14.
3. Hammond B, Lemen J, Dudek R, et al. Results of a 90-day safety assurance study with rats fed grain from corn rootworm-protected corn. Food Chem Toxicol 2006;44:147-60.
4. Hammond BG, Dudek R, Lemen JK, et al. Results of a 90-day safety assurance study with rats fed grain from corn borer-protected corn. Food Chem Toxicol 2006;44:1092-9.
5. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Review of the Séralini et al. (2012) publication on a 2-year rodent feeding study with glyphosate formulations and GM maize NK603 as published online on 19 September 2012 in Food and Chemical Toxicology. EFSA J 2012;10:2910.
6. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Final review of the Séralini et al. (2012a) publication on a 2-year rodent feeding study with glyphosate formulations and GM maize NK603 as published online on 19 September 2012 in Food and Chemical Toxicology. EFSA J 2012;10:2986.
7. Lepage C. OGM: l'EFSA a manqué à une déontologie élémentaire [GMOs: EFSA breaches basic ethical code]. Le Nouvel Observateur 7 October 2012.
8. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials. Food Chem Toxicol 2008;46(Suppl 1):S2-70.
9. European Food Safety Authority Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO). Scientific opinion on guidance for risk assessment of food and feed from genetically modified plants. EFSA J 2011;9:2150.
10. European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility (ENSSER). Questionable biosafety of GMOs, double standards and, once again, a "shooting-the-messenger" style debate. 2012.
11. Then C. The European Food Safety Authority: Using double standards when assessing feeding studies: a Testbiotech background. 2012.
12. Andalo C, Chercheuse AHS, Atlan A, et al. Science et conscience [Science and conscience]. Le Monde November 2012.
13. European Parliament and Council. Directive 2001/18/ EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. Off J Eur Commun 2001:1-38.
14. de Vrieze J. European food safety official resigns amidst conflict of interest controversy. ScienceInsider May 2012.
15. Then C, Bauer-Panskus A. European Food Safety Authority: a playing field for the biotech industry: TestBiotech. 2010.
16. Robinson C. Europe's pesticide and food safety regulators: who do they work for?: Earth Open Source. 2011.
17. International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI). Annual report. 2011.
18. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). EFSA management board chair resigns [press release]. 2012.
19. Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO). Approving the GM potato: conflicts of interest, flawed science and fierce lobbying. 2011.
20. Then C. Head of department moves from European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to biotech company within two months [press release]. 2010.
21. Then C. European Ombudsman demands EFSA admit failure [press release]: Testbiotech. 2011.
22. Diamandouros PN. Draft recommendations of the European Ombudsman in his inquiry into complaint 775/2010/ANA against the European Food Safety Authority. 2011.
23. Macovei M. Discharge postponed for three agencies -correct management of conflict of interests on EP agenda [press release]: EPP Group in the European Parliament. 2012.
24. European Parliament. Decision of 10 May 2012 on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2010 (C7-0286/2011-2011/2226 (DEC)). 2012.
25. European Court of Auditors. Management of conflict of interest in selected EU agencies: Special report no. 15. Luxembourg, 2012.
26. Trollope K. MEPs call for clear timetable from EFSA for concrete measures on credibility. EU Food Policy, 2011.
27. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). A policy on independence and scientific decision-making processes of the European Food Safety Authority. 2011.
28. Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO). Conflicts of interest still evident on new ESFA expert panels [press release]. 2012.
29. European Parliament and Council. Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety. 2002.
30. Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO). Independence of EFSA's GMO risk assessment challenged [press release]. 2012.
31. European Commission. Commission implementing regulation (EU) No.... on applications for authorisation of genetically modified food and feed in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Regulations (EC) No 641/2004 and (EC) No 1981/2006. 2012.
32. Earth Open Source. EU Commission's draft GMO Regulation: Charter for the GM industry, 2012.
33. Testbiotech. Tabled overview of arguments against market authorisation of MON89034 x MON88017. 2012.
34. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Scientific opinion: statistical significance and biological relevance. EFSA J 2011;9:2372.
35. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the Commission related to the safety of foods and food ingredients derived from herbicide-tolerant genetically modified maize NK603, for which a request for placing on the market was submitted under Article 4 of the Novel Food Regulation (EC) No 258/97 by Monsanto (QUESTION NO EFSA-Q-2003-002): Opinion adopted on 25 November 2003. EFSA J 2003;2003:1-14.
36. de Vendomois JS, Roullier F, Cellier D, et al. A comparison of the effects of three GM corn varieties on mammalian health. Int J Biol Sci 2009;5:706-26.
37. Bové J, Lepage C, Rivasi M, et al. OGM et sécurité alimentaire: Lettre ouverte à la Commission européenne [GMOs and food safety: Open letter to the European Commission]. Huffington Post 15 November 2012.
38. ILSI Europe. Threshold of Toxicological Concern Task Force. Secondary Threshold of Toxicological Concern Task Force. 2012. http://www.ilsi.org/Europe/Pages/TF_ThresholdToxicological.aspx(accessed26Feb2013).
39. Koster S, Boobis AR, Cubberley R, et al. Application of the TTC concept to unknown substances found in analysis of foods. Food Chem Toxicol 2011;49:1643-60.
40. Munro IC, Renwick AG, Danielewska-Nikiel B. The Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) in risk assessment. Toxicol Lett 2008;180:151-6.
41. Whaley P. Thresholds of toxicological concern: evaluating an initiative to reduce animal testing (part 1). Health & Environment Online 23 January 2012.
42. European Food Safety Authority Scientific Committee. Scientific opinion on exploring options for providing advice about possible human health risks based on the concept of threshold of toxicological concern (TTC). EFSA J 2012;10:2750.
43. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Opinion of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA related to a harmonised approach for risk assessment of substances which are both genotoxic and carcinogenic: Adopted on 18 October 2005. EFSA J 2005;2005:1-31.
44. European Parliament and Council. Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/ 414/EEC. Off J Eur Union 2009:1-50.
45. Muilerman H, Tweedale T. A toxic mixture? Industry bias found in EFSA working group on risk assessment for toxic chemicals: Pesticide Action Network Europe. 2011.
46. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Guidance: submission of scientific peer-reviewed open literature for the approval of pesticide active substances under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009. EFSA J 2011;9:1-50.
47. Klimisch HJ, Andreae M, Tillmann U. A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 1997;25:1-5.
48. Barnes DE, Bero LA. Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. JAMA 1998;279:1566-70.
49. Michaels D. Doubt is their product: how industry's assault on science threatens your health. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2008.
50. Myers JP, vom Saal FS, Akingbemi BT, et al. Why public health agencies cannot depend on good laboratory practices as a criterion for selecting data: the case of bisphenol A. Environ Health Perspect 2009;117:309-15.
51. Vom Saal FS, Hughes C. An extensive new literature concerning low-dose effects of bisphenol A shows the need for a new risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect 2005;113:926-33.
52. Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, et al. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ 2003;326:1167.
53. Lexchin J. Those who have the gold make the evidence: how the pharmaceutical industry biases the outcomes of clinical trials of medications. Sci Eng Ethics 2012;18:247-61.
54. Domingo JL, Bordonaba JG. A literature review on the safety assessment of genetically modified plants. Environ Int 2011;37:734-42.
55. Diels J, Cunha M, Manaia C, et al. Association of financial or professional conflict of interest to research outcomes on health risks or nutritional assessment studies of genetically modified products. Food Policy 2011;36:197-203.
56. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Conflict of interest policies and practices in nine EU member states: a comparative review. Sigma Papers, 2005.
57. Woodruff TJ, Sutton P, Navigation Guide Work Group. An evidence-based medicine methodology to bridge the gap between clinical and environmental health sciences. Health Aff 2011;30:931-7.
58. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2013. http://www. cochrane.org/ (accessed 26 Feb 2013).