Dissociating between object affordances and spatial compatibility effects using early response components

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 4, Issue SEP, 2013, Pages

  Wilf, Meytal ^a,b   Holmes, Nicholas P ^c   Schwartz, Isabella ^d   Makin, Tamar R ^a,e  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^c UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^d HADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Affordance; Amputees; EMG; Hand; Stimulus response

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885346031     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00591     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anderson, S. J., Yamagishi, N., and Karavia, V. (2002). Attentional processes link perception and action. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 269, 1225-1232. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.1998.
2. Burle, B., Possamaï, C.-A., Vidal, F., Bonnet, M., and Hasbroucq, T. (2002). Executive control in the Simon effect:an electromyographic and distributional analysis. Psychol. Res. 66, 324-336. doi:10.1007/s00426-002-0105-6.
3. Cavina-Pratesi, C., Ietswaart, M., Humphreys, G. W., Lestou, V., and Milner, A. D. (2010a). Impaired grasping in a patient with optic ataxia:primary visuomotor deficit or secondary consequence of misreaching? Neuropsychologia 48, 226-234. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.008.
4. Cavina-Pratesi, C., Monaco, S., Fattori, P., Galletti, C., McAdam, T. D., Quinlan, D. J., et al. (2010b). Functional magnetic resonance imaging reveals the neural substrates of arm transport and grip formation in reach-to-grasp actions in humans. J. Neurosci. 30, 10306-10323. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2023-10.2010.
5. Cho, D. T., and Proctor, R. W. (2010). The object-based Simon effect:grasping affordance or relative location of the graspable part? J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 36, 853-861. doi:10.1037/a0019328.
6. Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs:a simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method. Tutor. Quant. Methods Psychol. 1, 42-45.
7. Ellis, R., and Tucker, M. (2000). Micro-affordance:the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. Br. J. Psychol. 91(Pt 4), 451-471. doi:10.1348/000712600161934.
8. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA:Houghton-Mifflin.
9. Hodges, P. W., and Bui, B. H. (1996). A comparison of computer-based methods for the determination of onset of muscle contraction using electromyography. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 101, 511-519. doi:10.1016/S0921-884X(96)95190-5.
10. Jeannerod, M. (1999). Visuomotor channels:their integration in goal-directed prehension. Hum. Mov. Sci. 18, 201-218. doi:10.1016/S0167-9457(99)00008-1.
11. Kostov, K., and Janyan, A. (2012). The role of attention in the affordance effect:can we afford to ignore it? Cogn. Process. 13(Suppl. 1), S215-S218. doi:10.1007/s10339-012-0452-1.
12. Lacouture, Y., and Cousineau, D. (2008). How to use MATLAB to fit the ex-Gaussian and other probability functions to a distribution of response times. Tutor. Quant. Methods Psychol. 4, 35-45.
13. Makin, T. R., Holmes, N. P., Brozzoli, C., Rossetti, Y., and Farnè, A. (2009). Coding of visual space during motor preparation:approaching objects rapidly modulate corticospinal excitability in hand-centered coordinates. J. Neurosci. 29, 11841-11851. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2955-09.2009.
14. Makin, T. R., Scholz, J., Filippini, N., Slater, D. H., Tracey, I., and Johansen-Berg, H. (2013). Phantom pain is associated with preserved structure and function in the former hand area. Nat. Commun. 4:1570. doi:10.1038/ncomms2571.
15. Makin, T. R., Wilf, M., Schwartz, I., and Zohary, E. (2010). Amputees "neglect" the space near their missing hand. Psychol. Sci. 21, 55-57. doi:10.1177/0956797609354739.
16. Makris, S., Hadar, A. A., and Yarrow, K. (2011). Viewing objects and planning actions:on the potentiation of grasping behaviours by visual objects. Brain Cogn. 77, 257-264. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.08.002.
17. McBride, J., Sumner, P., and Husain, M. (2012). Conflict in object affordance revealed by grip force. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Hove) 65, 13-24. doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.588336.
18. Michel, J. B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., Pickett, J. P., et al. (2011). Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331, 176-182. doi:10.1126/science.1199644.
19. Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data:a correction to Cousineau (2005). Reason 9, 49-46.
20. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness:the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9, 97-113. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4.
21. Paulignan, Y., Jeannerod, M., Mackenzie, C., and Marteniuk, R. (1991a). Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. Exp. Brain Res. 87, 407-420. doi:10.1007/BF00231858.
22. Paulignan, Y., Mackenzie, C., Marteniuk, R., and Jeannerod, M. (1991b). Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. Exp. Brain Res. 83, 502-512. doi:10.1007/BF00229827.
23. Pellicano, A., Iani, C., Borghi, A. M., Rubichi, S., and Nicoletti, R. (2010). Simon-like and functional affordance effects with tools:the effects of object perceptual discrimination and object action state. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 63, 2190-2201. doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.486903.
24. Philip, B. A., and Frey, S. H. (2013). Stimulus-response correspondence across peripersonal space is unaffected by chronic unilateral limb loss. Exp. Brain Res. 224, 373-382. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3317-z.
25. Phillips, J. C., and Ward, R. (2002). SR correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance:time course and specificity of response activation. Vis. Cogn. 9, 540-558. doi:10.1080/13506280143000575.
26. Poliakoff, E., Galpin, A., Dick, J., Moore, P., and Tipper, S. P. (2007). The effect of viewing graspable objects and actions in Parkinson's disease. Neuroreport 18, 483-487. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e32805867a1.
27. Pruszynski, J. A., Kurtzer, I., and Scott, S. H. (2008). Rapid motor responses are appropriately tuned to the metrics of a visuo-spatial task. J. Neurophysiol. 100, 224-238. doi:10.1152/jn.90262.2008.
28. Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002). Micro-and macro-adjustments of task set:activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychol. Res. 66, 312-323. doi:10.1007/s00426-002-0104-7.
29. Riggio, L., Iani, C., Gherri, E., Benatti, F., Rubichi, S., and Nicoletti, R. (2008). The role of attention in the occurrence of the affordance effect. Acta psychol. 127, 449-458. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.008.
30. Simon, J. R., and Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory SR compatibility:the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. J. Appl. Psychol. 51, 300. doi:10.1037/h0020586.
31. Symes, E., Ellis, R., and Tucker, M. (2005). Dissociating object-based and space-based affordances. Vis. Cogn. 12, 1337-1361. doi:10.1080/13506280444000445.
32. Tucker, M., and Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24, 830-846. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.830.
33. Tucker, M., and Ellis, R. (2004). Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychol. (Amst) 116, 185-203. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.01.004.
34. Vainio, L., Ellis, R., Tucker, M., and Symes, E. (2006). Manual asymmetries in visually primed grasping. Exp. Brain Res. 173, 395-406. doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0378-x.