Viewing objects and planning actions: On the potentiation of grasping behaviours by visual objects

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 257-264

  Makris, Stergios ^a   Hadar, Aviad A ^a   Yarrow, Kielan ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Affordances; Motor planning; TMS; Tool objects; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; FEMALE; GRIP STRENGTH; HAND MUSCLE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PINCH STRENGTH; PRECISION GRIP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 80054083630     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anderson S.J., Yamagishi N., Karavia V. Attentional processes link perception and action. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 2002, 269:1225-1232.
2. Buccino G., Sato M., Cattaneo L., Rodà F., Riggio L. Broken affordances, broken objects: A TMS study. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:3074-3078.
3. Chao L.L., Martin A. Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage 2000, 12:478-484.
4. Cisek P. Integrated neural processes for defining potential actions and deciding between them: a computational model. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26(38):9761-9770.
5. Cisek P. Cortical mechanisms of action selection: the affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society B 2007, 362(1485):1585-1599.
6. Craighero L., Fadiga L., Rizzolatti G., Umiltà C. Action for perception: A motor-visual attentional effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:1673-1692.
7. Craighero L., Fadiga L., Umiltà C.A., Rizzolatti G. Evidence for visuomotor priming effect. Neuroreport 1996, 8:347-349.
8. Ellis R., Tucker M. Micro-affordance. The potentiation of components of action by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology 2000, 91:451-471.
9. Gibson J.J. The information available in pictures. Leonardo 1971, 4:27-35.
10. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception 1979, Michigan, Houghton Mifflin, 332 pp.
11. Grafton S.T., Fadiga L., Arbib M.A., Rizzolatti G. Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. NeuroImage 1997, 6:231-236.
12. Grèzes J., Tucker M., Armony J., Ellis R., Passingham R.E. Objects automatically potentiate action: An fMRI study of implicit processing. European Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 17:2735-2740.
13. Hadar, A. A., Makris, S., & Yarrow, K. (in press). Single-pulse TMS related syncopal spell in a healthy subject. Brain Stimulation.
14. Humphreys G.W., Riddoch J., Forti S., Ackroyd K. Action influences spatial perception: Neuropsychological evidence. Visual Cognition 2004, 11:401-427.
15. Izumi S., Findley T.W., Ikai T., Andrews J., Daum M., Chino N. Facilitatory effect of thinking about movement on motor-evoked potentials to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1995, 74:207-213.
16. Luce R.D. Response times: their role in inferring elementary mental organization 1986, Oxford University Press, New York.
17. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
18. Phillips J.C., Ward R. S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance. Time course and specificity of response activation. Visual Cognition 2002, 9:540-558.
19. Riddoch M.J., Humphreys G.W., Edwards S., Baker T., Willson K. Seeing the action: Neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:82-89.
20. Rizzolatti G., Camarda R., Fogassi L., Gentilucci M., Luppino G., Matelli M. Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements. Experimental Brain Research 1988, 71:491-507.
21. Rösler K.M., Magistris M.R. The size of motor-evoked potentials: Influencing parameters and quantification. The oxford handbook of transcranial stimulation 2008, 75-89. Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press. 1st ed. E.M. Wassermann, C.M. Epstein, U. Ziemann, V. Walsh, T. Paus, S.H. Lisanby (Eds.).
22. Rossi S., Hallett M., Rossini P.M., Pascual-Leone A., Safety The., of TMS Consensus G., et al. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clinical Neurophysiology 2009, 120:2008-2039.
23. Tucker M., Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:830-846.
24. Tucker M., Ellis R. The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition 2001, 8:769-800.
25. Valyear K.F., Cavina-Pratesi C., Stiglick A.J., Culham J.C. Does tool related fMRI activity within the intraparietal sulcus reflect the plan to grasp?. NeuroImage 2007, 36(Suppl. 2):94-108.
26. Vingerhoets G., Vandamme K., Vercammen A. Conceptual and physical object qualities contribute differently to motor affordances. Brain and Cognition 2009, 69:481-489.
27. Wassermann E.M. Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report and suggested guidelines from the international workshop on the safety of rTMS. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1998, 108:1-16.
28. Yang T.L., Dixon M.W., Proffitt D.R. Seeing big things: Overestimation of heights is greater for real objects than for objects in pictures. Perception 1999, 24:445-467.
29. Yantis S., Jonides J. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1984, 10:601-621.
30. Yarrow K., Brown P., Krakauer J.W. Inside the brain of an elite athlete: the neural processes that support high achievement in sports. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2009, 10:585-596.