Conflict in object affordance revealed by grip force

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 13-24

  McBride, Jennifer ^a   Sumner, Petroc ^b   Husain, Masud ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conflict; Continuous force; Object affordance; Stimulus response mapping

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONFLICT; FEMALE; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ADULT; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84859018090     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.588336     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Anderson, S. J., Yamagishi, N. and Karavia, V. 2002. Attentional processes link perception and action. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 269: 1225-1232.
2. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S. and Cohen, J. D. 2001. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108: 624-652.
3. Boutsen, L., Lamberts, K. and Verfaillie, K. 1998. Recognition times of different views of 56 depth-rotated objects: A note concerning Verfaillie and Boutsen (1995). Perception & Psychophysics, 60: 900-907.
4. Boy, F., Husain, M. and Sumner, P. 2010. Unconscious inhibition separates two forms of cognitive control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107: 11134-11139.
5. Burle, B., Allain, S., Vidal, F. and Hasbroucq, T. 2005. Sequential compatibility effects and cognitive control: Does conflict really matter?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31: 831-837.
6. Cho, D. and Proctor, R. W. 2010. The object-based Simon effect: Grasping affordance or relative location of the graspable part?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 36: 853-861.
7. Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W. and Donchin, E. 1985. A psychophysical investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11: 529-553.
8. De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C. and Lauber, E. 1994. Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20: 731-750.
9. Derbyshire, N., Ellis, R. and Tucker, M. 2006. The potentiation of two components of the reach-to-grasp action during object categorisation in visual memory. Acta Psychologica, 122: 74-98.
10. Egner, T. and Hirsch, J. 2005. The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task. NeuroImage, 24: 539-547.
11. Eimer, M. and Schlaghecken, F. 1998. Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24: 1737-1747.
12. Ellis, R. and Tucker, M. 2000. Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology, 91: 451-471.
13. Ellis, R., Tucker, M., Symes, E. and Vainio, L. 2007. Does selecting one visual object from several require inhibition of actions associated with nonselected objects?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33: 670-691.
14. Eriksen, B. A. and Eriksen, C. W. 1974. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16: 143-149.
15. Eriksen, C. W., Coles, M. G. H., Morris, L. R. and O'Hara, W. P. 1985. An electromyographic examination of response competition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23: 165-168.
16. Fournier, L. R., Scheffers, M. K., Coles, M. G. H., Adamson, A. and Abad, E. V. 1997. The dimensionality of the flanker compatibility effect: A psychophysiological analysis. Psychological Research, 60: 144-155.
17. Gibson, J. J. 1986. The ecological approach to visual perception, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
18. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H. and Donchin, E. 1992. Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121: 480-506.
19. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., Sirevaag, E. J., Eriksen, C. W. and Donchin, E. 1988. Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14: 331-344.
20. Greeno, J. G. 1994. Gibson's affordances. Psychological Review, 101: 336-342.
21. Grèzes, J. and Decety, J. 2002. Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia, 40: 212-220.
22. Grèzes, J., Tucker, M., Armony, J., Ellis, R. and Passingham, R. E. 2003. Objects automatically potentiate action: An fMRI study of implicit processing. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17: 2735-2740.
23. Iani, C., Baroni, G., Pellicano, A. and Nicoletti, R. 2011. On the relationship between affordance and Simon effects: Are the effects really independent?. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23: 121-131.
24. Mayr, U., Awh, E. and Laurey, P. 2003. Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6: 450-452.
25. Nachev, P., Kennard, C. and Husain, M. 2008. Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9: 856-869.
26. Oldfield, R. C. 1971. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9: 97-113.
27. Pellicano, A., Iani, C., Borghi, A. M., Rubichi, S. and Nicoletti, R. 2010. Simon-like and functional affordance effects with tools: The effects of object perceptual discrimination and object action state. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63: 2190-2201.
28. Phillips, J. C. and Ward, R. 2002. S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: Time course and specificity of response activation. Visual Cognition, 9: 540-558.
29. Ridderinkhof, K. R. 2002. "Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses". In Attention & Performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action, Edited by: Prinz, W. and Hommel, B. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
30. Simon, J. R. 1969. Reactions towards the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81: 174-176.
31. Symes, E., Ellis, R. and Tucker, M. 2005. Dissociating object-based and space-based affordances. Visual Cognition, 12: 1337-1361.
32. Tucker, M. and Ellis, R. 1998. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24: 830-846.
33. Tucker, M. and Ellis, R. 2001. The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition, 8: 769-800.
34. Vainio, L., Ellis, R. and Tucker, M. 2006. Manual asymmetries in visually primed grasping. Experimental Brain Research, 173: 395-406.
35. Vainio, L., Ellis, R. and Tucker, M. 2007. The role of visual attention in action priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60: 241-261.
36. van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Wylie, S. A., Forstmann, B. U., Burle, B., Hasbroucq, T. and Ridderinkhof, K. R. 2010. To head or to heed? Beyond the surface of selective action inhibition: A review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4: 1-13.
37. Verfaillie, K. and Boutsen, L. 1995. A corpus of 714 full-color images of depth-rotated objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 57: 925-961.
38. Wascher, E., Schatz, U., Kuder, T. and Verleger, R. 2001. Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27: 731-751.
39. Wiegand, K. and Wascher, E. 2005. Dynamic aspects of stimulus-response correspondence: Evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31: 453-464.
40. Wühr, P. and Ansorge, U. 2005. Exploring trial-by-trial modulations of the Simon effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A: 705-731.
41. Wylie, S. A., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Bashore, T. R., Powell, V. D.Manning, C. A. 2009. The effect of speed-accuracy strategy on response interference control in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia, 47: 1844-1853.