P16INK4a immunoprofiles of squamous lesions of the uterine cervix-implications for the reclassification of atypical immature squamous metaplasia

Pathology and Oncology Research

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 707-714

  Skapa, Petr ^a   Robova, Helena ^a   Rob, Lukas ^a   Zamecnik, Josef ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MOTOL   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Atypical immature squamous metaplasia; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Cytokeratin 17; Flat condyloma; p16; Uterine cervix

Indexed keywords

CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE INHIBITOR 2A; CYTOKERATIN 17;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONDYLOMA; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IMMUNOPHENOTYPING; KOILOCYTOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX DYSPLASIA;

CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE INHIBITOR P16; FEMALE; HUMANS; KERATIN-17; METAPLASIA; UTERINE CERVICAL DYSPLASIA; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84885189929     PISSN: 12194956     EISSN: 15322807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12253-013-9633-1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. McCluggage WG, Walsh MY, Thornton CM, Hamilton PW, Date A, Caughley LM, Bharucha H (1998) Inter- and intra-observer variation in the histopathological reporting of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions using a modified Bethesda grading system. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105(2):206-210
2. Stoler MH, Schiffman M (2001) Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study. JAMA 285(11):1500-1505
3. Carreon JD, Sherman ME, Guillén D, Solomon D, Herrero R, Jerónimo J, Wacholder S, Rodríguez AC, Morales J, Hutchinson M, Burk RD, Schiffman M (2007) CIN2 is a much less reproducible and less valid diagnosis than CIN3: results from a histological review of population-based cervical samples. Int J Gynecol Pathol 26(4):441-446
4. Crum CP, Egawa K, Fu YS, Lancaster WD, Barron B, Levine RU, Fenoglio CM, Richart RM (1983) Atypical immature metaplasia (AIM). A subset of human papilloma virus infection of the cervix. Cancer 51(12):2214-2219
5. Geng L, Connolly DC, Isacson C, Ronnett BM, Cho KR (1999) Atypical immature metaplasia (AIM) of the cervix: is it related to high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL)? Hum Pathol 30(3):345-351
6. Iaconis L, Hyjek E, Ellenson LH, Pirog EC (2007) p16 and Ki-67 immunostaining in atypical immature squamous metaplasia of the uterine cervix: correlation with human papillomavirus detection. Arch Pathol Lab Med 131(9):1343-1349
7. Duggan MA, Akbari M, Magliocco AM (2006) Atypical immature cervical metaplasia: immunoprofiling and longitudinal outcome. Hum Pathol 37(11):1473-1481
8. O'Neill CJ, McCluggage WG (2006) p16 expression in the female genital tract and its value in diagnosis. Adv Anat Pathol 13(1):8-15
9. Branca M, Ciotti M, Santini D, Di Bonito L, Giorgi C, Benedetto A, Paba P, Favalli C, Costa S, Agarossi A, Alderisio M, Syrjanen K (2004) p16(INK4A) expression is related to grade of CIN and high-risk human papillomavirus but does not predict virus clearance after conization or disease outcome. Int J Gynecol Pathol 23(4):354-365
10. Martens JE, Arends J, Van der Linden PJ, De Boer BA, Helmerhorst TJ (2004) Cytokeratin 17 and p63 are markers of the HPV target cell, the cervical stem cell. Anticancer Res 24(2B):771-775
11. Smedts F, Ramaekers F, Troyanovsky S, Pruszczynski M, Robben H, Lane B, Leigh I, Plantema F, Vooijs P (1992) Basal-cell keratins in cervical reserve cells and a comparison to their expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Pathol 140(3):601-612
12. Ikeda K, Tate G, Suzuki T, Mitsuya T (2008) Coordinate expression of cytokeratin 8 and cytokeratin 17 immunohistochemical staining in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical squamous cell carcinoma: an immunohistochemical analysis and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 108(3):598-602
13. Regauer S, Reich O (2007) CK17 and p16 expression patterns distinguish (atypical) immature squamous metaplasia from high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN III). Histopathology 50(5):629-635
14. Klaes R, Friedrich T, Spitkovsky D, Ridder R, Rudy W, Petry U, Dallenbach-Hellweg G, Schmidt D, von Knebel Doeberitz M (2001) Overexpression of p16(INK4A) as a specific marker for dysplastic and neoplastic epithelial cells of the cervix uteri. Int J Cancer 92(2):276-284
15. Keating JT, Cviko A, Riethdorf S, Riethdorf L, Quade BJ, Sun D, Duensing S, Sheets EE, Munger K, Crum CP (2001) Ki-67, cyclin E, and p16INK4 are complimentary surrogate biomarkers for human papilloma virus-related cervical neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol 25(7):884-891
16. Sano T, Oyama T, Kashiwabara K, Fukuda T, Nakajima T (1998) Expression status of p16 protein is associated with human papillomavirus oncogenic potential in cervical and genital lesions. Am J Pathol 153(6):1741-1748
17. Omori M, Hashi A, Nakazawa K, Yuminamochi T, Yamane T, Hirata S, Katoh R, Hoshi K (2007) Estimation of prognoses for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 by p16INK4a immunoexpression and high-risk HPV in situ hybridization signal types. Am J Clin Pathol 128(2):208-217
18. Focchi GR, Silva ID, Nogueira-de-Souza NC, Dobo C, Oshima CT, Stavale JN (2007) Immunohistochemical expression of p16(INK4A) in normal uterine cervix, nonneoplastic epithelial lesions, and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. J Low Genit Tract Dis 11(2):98-104
19. Wright TC, Massad LS, Dunton CJ, Spitzer M, Wilkinson EJ, Solomon D (2007) 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197(4):340-345
20. Negri G, Vittadello F, Romano F, Kasal A, Rivasi F, Girlando S, Mian C, Egarter-Vigl E (2004) p16INK4a expression and progression risk of low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix uteri. Virchows Arch 445(6):616-620
21. Wang JL, Zheng BY, Li XD, Angstrom T, Lindstrom MS, Wallin KL (2004) Predictive significance of the alterations of p16INK4A, p14ARF, p53, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression in the progression of cervical cancer. Clin Cancer Res 10(7):2407-2414
22. Hariri J, Oster A (2007) The negative predictive value of p16INK4a to assess the outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 in the uterine cervix. Int J Gynecol Pathol 26(3):223-228
23. Castle PE, Schiffman M, Wheeler CM, Solomon D (2009) Evidence for frequent regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia-grade 2. Obstet Gynecol 113(1):18-25