Nanofiber density determines endothelial cell behavior on hydrogel matrix

Materials Science and Engineering C

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 4684-4691

  Berti, Fernanda V ^a   Rambo, Carlos R ^a   Dias, Paulo F ^a   Porto, Luismar M ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

(BCTEC); Bacterial cellulose tissue engineering construct; HUVEC; Scaffold microarchitecture; Secondary necrosis

Indexed keywords

CELL CULTURE; CELLS; CELLULOSE; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; CYTOLOGY; ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; FIBERS; HYDROGELS; MOLECULAR OXYGEN; POROSITY; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

(BCTEC); BACTERIAL CELLULOSE; HUVEC; MICRO ARCHITECTURES; SECONDARY NECROSIS;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

CELLULOSE; NANOFIBER; HYDROGEL;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CELLULOSE TISSUE ENGINEERING CONSTRUCT (BCTEC); CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECT; GLUCONACETOBACTER; HUMAN; HUVEC; HYDROGEL; METABOLISM; POROSITY; SCAFFOLD MICROARCHITECTURE; SECONDARY NECROSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TISSUE ENGINEERING; UMBILICAL VEIN ENDOTHELIAL CELL; DRUG EFFECTS; TOXICITY;

BACTERIAL CELLULOSE TISSUE ENGINEERING CONSTRUCT (BCTEC); HUVEC; SCAFFOLD MICROARCHITECTURE; SECONDARY NECROSIS;

CELL ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CELLULOSE; GLUCONACETOBACTER; HUMAN UMBILICAL VEIN ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; NANOFIBERS; POROSITY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84885181882     PISSN: 09284931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.07.029     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. H. Backdahl, G. Helenius, A. Bodin, U. Nannmark, B.R. Johansson, B. Risberg, P. Gatenholm, Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells, Biomaterials 4 (2006) 2141-2149.
2. J. Lu, M.P. Rao, N.C. MacDonald, D. Khang, T.J. Webster, Improved endothelial cell adhesion and proliferation on patterned titanium surface with rationally designed, micrometer to nanometer features, Acta Biomater. 4 (2008) 192-201.
3. S. Tajima, J.S. Chu, S. Li, K. Komvopoulos, Differential regulation of endothelial cell adhesion, spreading, and cytoskeleton on low-density polyethylene by nanotopo-graphy and surface chemistry modification induced by argon plasma treatment, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 84 (2008) 828-836.
4. S.J. Liliensiek, J.A. Wood, J. Yong, R. Auerbach, P.F. Nealey, C.J. Murphy, Modulation of human vascular endothelial cell behaviors by nanotopographic cues, Biomaterials 31 (2010) 5418-5426.
5. S.R. Khetani, S.N. Bhatia, Engineering tissue for in vitro applications, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 17 (2006) 524-531.
6. S.H. Tsai, Y.W. Liu, W.C. Tang, Z.W. Zhou, C.Y. Hwang, G.Y. Hwang, B.R. Ou, et al., Characterization of porcine arterial endothelial cells cultured on amniotic membrane, a potential matrix for vascular tissue engineering, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 357 (2007) 984-990.
7. D. Klemm, D. Schumann, U. Udhardt, S. Marsch, Bacterial synthesized cellulose-artificial blood vessels for microsurgery, Prog. Polym. Sci. 26 (2001) 1561-1603.
8. D.O. Klemm, F. Kramer, H. Kamitakahara, Nanocellulose as innovative polymers in research and application, Adv. Polym. Sci. 205 (2006) 49-96.
9. H. Backdahl, M. Esguerra, D. Delbro, B. Risberg, P. Gatenholm, Engineering micropo-rosity in bacterial cellulose scaffolds, J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2 (2008) 320-330.
10. C.R. Rambo, D.O.S. Recouvreux, C.A. Carminatti, A.K. Pitlovanciv, R.V. Antonio, L.M. Porto, Template assisted synthesis of porous nanofibrous cellulose membrane for tissue engineering, Mat. Sci. Eng. C-Bio. S. 28 (2008) 549-554.
11. F.K. Andrade, R. Costa, L. Domingues, R. Soares, M. Gama, Improving bacterial cellulose for blood vessel replacement: Functionalization with a chimeric protein containing a cellulose-binding module and an adhesion peptide, Acta Biomater. 6 (2010) 4034-4404.
12. F.K. Andrade, J.P. Silva, M. Carvalho, E.M.S. Castanheiras, R. Soares, M. Gama, Studies on the hemocompatibility of bacterial cellulose, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 98 (2011) 554-566.
13. D.O.S. Recouvreux, C.R. Rambo, F.V. Berti, C.A. Carminatti, R.V. Antonio, L.M. Porto, Novel three-dimensional cocoon-like hydrogels for soft tissue regeneration, Mater. Sci. Eng. C 31 (2011) 151-157.
14. R.A.N. Pértile, S. Moreira, R.M.G. Da Costa, A. Correia, L. Guardao, F. Gartner, M. Vilanova, M. Gama, Bacterial cellulose: long-term biocompatibility studies, J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 23 (2012) 1339-1354.
15. R.M. Brown, J.H. Willison, C.L. Richardson, Cellulose biosynthesis in Acetobacter xylinum: visualization of the side of synthesis and direct measurement of the in vivo process, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73 (1979) 4565-4569.
16. W. Borzani, S.J. Desouza, Mechanism of the film thickness increasing during the bacterial production of cellulose on non-agitated liquid-media, Biotechnol. Lett. 17 (1995) 1271-1272.
17. N. Petersen, P. Gatenholm, Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 91 (2011) 1277-1286.
18. D.G. Stupack, D.A. Cheresh, ECM remodeling regulates angiogenesis: endothelial integrins look for new ligands, Sci. STKE 119 (2002) pe7.
19. H. Methe, S. Hess, E.R. Edelman, The effect of three-dimensional matrix-embedding of endothelial cells on the humoral and cellular immune response, Semin. Immunol. 20 (2008) 117-122.
20. C.K. Prasad, L.K. Krishnan, Regulation of endothelial cell phenotype by biomimetic matrix coated on biomaterials for cardiovascular tissue engineering, Acta Biomater. 4 (2008) 182-191.
21. S.I. Jeong, S.E. Lee, H. Yang, Y. Jin, C. Park, Toxicologic evaluation of bacterial synthesized cellulose in endothelial cells and animals, Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 6 (2010) 373-380.
22. C.S. Chen, M. Mrksich, S. Huang, G.M. Whitesides, D.E. Ingber, Geometric control of cell life and death, Science 276 (1997) 1425-1428.
23. A. Curtis, C. Wilkinson, Topographical control of cells, Biomaterials 18 (1997) 1573-1583.
24. Y. Cao, M.R. Davidson, A.J. O'Connor, G.W. Stevens, J.J. Cooper-White, Architecture control of three-dimensional polymeric scaffolds for soft tissue engineering, in establishment and validation of numerical models, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 71 (2004) 81-89.
25. J.J. Norman, J.M. Collins, S. Sharma, B. Russell, T.A. Desai, Microstructures in 3D biological gels affect cell proliferation, Tissue Eng. Part A 14 (2008) 379-390.
26. M.P. Lutolf, Biomaterials: spotlight on hydrogels, Nat. Mater. 8 (2009) 451-453.
27. A.L. Bauer, T.L. Jackson, Y. Jiang, Topography of extracellular matrix mediates vascular morphogenesis and migration speeds in angiogenesis, PLoS Comput. Biol. 5 (7) (2009) e1000445.
28. A. Andukuri, W.P. Minor, M. Kushwaha, J.M. Anderson, H.W. Jun, Effect of endothe-lium mimicking self-assembled nanomatrices on cell adhesion and spreading of human endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells, Nanomedicine 6 (2010) 289-297.
29. T. Yeung, P.C. Georges, L.A. Flanagan, B. Marg, M. Ortiz, M. Funaki, N. Zahir, et al., Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion, Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 60 (2005) 24-34.
30. P.Y. Wang, J.S. Yu, J.H. Lin, W.B. Tsai, Modulation of alignment, elongation and contraction of cardiomyocytes through a combination of nanotopography and rigidity of substrates, Acta Biomater. 7 (2011) 3285-3293.
31. B.D. Lawrence, Z. Pan, A.H. Liu, D.L. Kaplan, M.I. Rosenblatt, Human corneal limbal epithelial cell response to varying silk film geometric topography in vitro, Acta Biomater. 8 (2012) 3732-3743.
32. V.V.D. Rani, L. Vinoth-Kumar, V.C. Anitha, K. Manzoor, M. Deepthy, V.N. Shantikumar, Osteointegration of titanium implant is sensitive to specific nanostructure morphology, Acta Biomater. 8 (2012) 1976-1989.
33. L. Indolfi, A.B. Baker, E.R. Edelman, The role of scaffold microarchitecture in engineering endothelial cell immunomodulation, Biomaterials 33 (2012) 7019-7027.
34. A.H. Wyllie, J.F. Kerr, A.R. Currie, Cell death: the significance of apoptosis, Int. Rev. Cytol. 68 (1980) 251-306.
35. P. Golstein, G. Kroemer, Cell death by necrosis: towards a molecular definition, Trends Biochem. Sci. 32 (2007) 37-43.
36. A.M. DeCathelineau, P.M. Henson, The final step in programmed cell death: phagocytes carry apoptotic cells to the grave, Program. Cell. Death. 39 (2003) 105-117.
37. M.T. Silva, Secondary necrosis: the natural outcome of the complete apoptotic program, FEBS Lett. 584 (2010) 4491-4499.
38. T.V. Berghe, N. Vanlangenakker, E. Parthoens, W. Deckers, M. Devos, N. Festjens, C.J. Guerin, et al., Necroptosis, necrosis and secondary necrosis converge on similar cellular disintegration features, Cell Death Differ. 17 (2010) 922-930.
39. Y.Xia, M. Prawirasatya, B.C. Heng, F. Boey, S.S. Venkatraman, Seeding density matters: extensive intercellular contact masks the surface dependence of endothelial cell-biomaterial interactions, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 22 (2011) 389-396.