Erratum to: Geometric Control of Cell Migration (Scientific Reports, (2013), 3, 1, (2827), 10.1038/srep02827);Geometric control of cell migration

Scientific Reports

Volumn 3, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Chen, Bo ^a   Kumar, Girish ^a,b   Co, Carlos C ^a   Ho, Chia Chi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYELECTROLYTE 60; POLYMER;

3T3 CELL LINE; ANIMAL; CELL MOTION; CELL POLARITY; CELL SURFACE; CHEMISTRY; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; GOLGI COMPLEX; METABOLISM; MOUSE; PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALS; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL POLARITY; CELL SURFACE EXTENSIONS; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; GOLGI APPARATUS; MICE; NIH 3T3 CELLS; POLYMERS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84885132143     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-33004-x     Document Type: Erratum

References (53)

1. Brundage, R. A., Fogarty, K. E., Tuft, R. A. & Fay, F. S. Calcium gradients underlying polarization and chemotaxis of eosinophils. Science 254, 703-706 (1991).
2. Wei, C. et al. Calcium flickers steer cell migration. Nature 457, 901-905 (2009).
3. Servant, G. et al. Polarization of chemoattractant receptor signaling during neutrophil chemotaxis. Science 287, 1037-1040 (2000).
4. Jin, T., Zhang, N., Long, Y., Parent, C. A. & Devreotes, P. N. Localization of the G protein beta gamma complex in living cells during chemotaxis. Science 287, 1034-1036 (2000).
5. Schmidt, C. E., Horwitz, A. F., Lauffenburger, D. A. & Sheetz, M. P. Integrincytoskeletal interactions in migrating fibroblasts are dynamic, asymmetric, and regulated. J. Cell Biol. 123, 977-991 (1993).
6. Lawson, M. A. & Maxfield, F. R. Ca21-And calcineurin-Dependent recycling of an integrin to the front of migrating neutrophils. Nature 377, 75-79 (1995).
7. Nabi, I. R. The polarization of the motile cell. J. Cell Sci. 112, 1803-1811 (1999).
8. Lauffenburger, D. A. & Horwitz, A. F. Cell migration: A physically integrated molecular process. Cell 84, 359-369 (1996).
9. Theriot, J. A.&Mitchison, T. J. Actin microfilament dynamics in locomoting cells. Nature 352, 126-131 (1991).
10. Stossel, T. P. On the crawling of animal cells. Science 260, 1086-1094 (1993).
11. Huttenlocher, A., Sandborg, R. R.&Horwitz, A. F. Cell adhesion in cell-Migration. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7, 697-706 (1995).
12. Dimilla, P. A., Barbee, K. & Lauffenburger, D. A. Mathematical model for the effects of adhesion and mechanics on cell migration speed. Biophys. J. 60, 15-37 (1991).
13. Mandeville, J. T. H., Lawson, M. A. & Maxfield, F. R. Dynamic imaging of neutrophil migration in three dimensions: Mechanical interactions between cells and matrix. J. Leukocyte Biol. 61, 188-200 (1997).
14. Palecek, S. P., Loftus, J. C., Ginsberg, M. H., Lauffenburger, D. A. & Horwitz, A. F. Integrin-Ligand binding properties govern cell migration speed through cellsubstratum adhesiveness. Nature 385, 537-540 (1997).
15. Giancotti, F. G. & Ruoslahti, E. Elevated levels of the alpha 5 beta 1 fibronectin receptor suppress the transformed phenotype of Chinese hamster ovary cells. Cell 60, 849-859 (1990).
16. Maheshwari, G., Brown, G., Lauffenburger, D. A.,Wells, A. & Griffith, L. G. Cell adhesion and motility depend on nanoscale RGD clustering. J. Cell Sci. 113, 1677-1686 (2000).
17. Kuijpers, T. W. et al. Freezing adhesion molecules in a state of high-Avidity binding blocks eosinophil migration. J. Exp. Med. 178, 279-284 (1993).
18. Dimilla, P. A., Stone, J. A., Quinn, J. A., Albelda, S. M. & Lauffenburger, D. A. Maximal migration of human smooth muscle cells on fibronectin and type IV collagen occurs at an intermediate attachment strength. J. Cell Biol. 122, 729-737 (1993).
19. Maheshwari, G., Wells, A., Griffith, L. G. & Lauffenburger, D. A. Biophysical integration of effects of epidermal growth factor and fibronectin on fibroblast migration. Biophys. J. 76, 2814-2823 (1999).
20. Balaban, N. Q. et al. Force and focal adhesion assembly: A close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 466-472 (2001).
21. Versaevel, M., Grevesse, T. & Gabriele, S. Spatial coordination between cell and nuclear shape within micropatterned endothelial cells. Nat. Commun. 3, 671 (2012).
22. Chen, C. S., Mrksich,M., Huang, S., Whitesides, G. M. & Ingber, D. E. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science 276, 1425-1428 (1997).
23. Chen, C. S., Alonso, J. L., Ostuni, E., Whitesides, G. M. & Ingber, D. E. Cell shape provides global control of focal adhesion assembly. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 307, 355-361 (2003).
24. Thomas, C. H., Collier, J. H., Sfeir, C. S. & Healy, K. E. Engineering gene expression and protein synthesis by modulation of nuclear shape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 1972-1977 (2002).
25. Nobes, C. D. & Hall, A. Rho GTPases control polarity, protrusion, and adhesion during cell movement. J. Cell Biol. 144, 1235-1244 (1999).
26. Magdalena, J., Millard, T. H. &Machesky, L. M. Microtubule involvement in NIH 3T3 Golgi and MTOC polarity establishment. J. Cell Sci. 116, 743-756 (2003).
27. Kupfer, A., Louvard, D. & Singer, S. Polarization of the Golgi apparatus and the microtubule-Organizing center in cultured fibroblasts at the edge of an experimental wound. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79, 2603-2607 (1982).
28. Tzima, E., Kiosses, W. B., del Pozo, M. A. & Schwartz, M. A. Localized Cdc42 activation, detected using a novel assay, mediates microtubule organizing center positioning in endothelial cells in response to fluid shear stress. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 31020-31023 (2003).
29. Schaar, B. T. & McConnell, S. K. Cytoskeletal coordination during neuroinal migration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 13652-13657 (2005).
30. Itoh, R. E. et al. Activation of Rac and Cdc42 video imaged by fluorescent resonance energy transfer-Based single-Molecule probes in the membrane of living cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 6582-6591 (2002).
31. Bergmann, J. E., Kupfer, A. & Singer, S. J. Membrane insertion at the leading edge of motile fibroblasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80, 1367-1371 (1983).
32. Ridley, A. J. et al. Cell migration: Integrating signals from front to back. Science 302, 1704-1709 (2003).
33. Euteneuer, U. & Schliwa, M. Mechanism of centrosome positioning during the wound response in BSC-1 cells. J. Cell Biol. 116, 1157-1166 (1992).
34. Gomes, E. R., Jani, S. & Gundersen, G. G. Nuclear movement regulated by Cdc42, MRCK, myosin, and actin flow establishes MTOC polarization in migrating cells. Cell 121, 451-463 (2005).
35. Gotlieb, A. I., Subrahmanyan, L. & Kalnins, V. I. Microtubule-Organizing centers and cell migration: Effect of inhibition of migration and microtubule disruption in endothelial cells. J. Cell Biol. 96, 1266-1272 (1983).
36. Etienne-Manneville, S. Cdc42-The centre of polarity. J. Cell Sci. 117, 1291-1300 (2004).
37. Etienne-Manneville, S. & Hall, A. Rho GTPases in cell biology. Nature 420, 629-635 (2002).
38. Co, C. C., Wang, Y. C.&Ho, C. C. Biocompatible micropatterning of two different cell types. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 1598-1599 (2005).
39. Kumar, G., Meng, J. J., Ip, W., Co, C. C. & Ho, C. C. Cell motility assays on tissue culture dishes via non-Invasive confinement and release of cells. Langmuir 21, 9267-9273 (2005).
40. Li, F., Li, B., Wang, Q.-M. & Wang, J. H. C. Cell shape regulates collagen type I expression in human tendon fibroblasts. Cell Motil. Cytoskel. 65, 332-341 (2008).
41. Pelham, R. J. & Wang, Y. L. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 13661-13665 (1997).
42. Brock, A. et al. Geometric determinants of directional cell motility revealed using microcontact printing. Langmuir 19, 1611-1617 (2003).
43. Parker, K. K. et al. Directional control of lamellipodia extension by constraining cell shape and orienting cell tractional forces. FASEB J. 16, 1195-1204 (2002).
44. Naumanen, P., Lappalainen, P. & Hotulainen, P. Mechanisms of actin stress fibre assembly. J. Microsc-Oxford 231, 446-454 (2008).
45. Bhadriraju, K. & Hansen, L. K. Extracellular matrix-And cytoskeleton-Dependent changes in cell shape and stiffness. Exp. Cell Res. 278, 92-100 (2002).
46. Doornaert, B. et al. Time course of actin cytoskeleton stiffness and matrix adhesion molecules in human bronchial epithelial cell cultures. Exp. Cell Res. 287, 199-208 (2003).
47. ChrzanowskaWodnicka, M. & Burridge, K. Rho-Stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions. J. Cell Biol. 133, 1403-1415 (1996).
48. Jiang, X. Y., Bruzewicz, D. A.,Wong, A. P., Piel, M. &Whitesides, G. M. Directing cell migration with asymmetric micropatterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 975-978 (2005).
49. Kumar, G., Co, C. C. & Ho, C. C. Steering cell migration using microarray amplification of natural directional persistence. Langmuir 27, 3803-3807 (2011).
50. Desai, R. A., Gao, L., Raghavan, S., Liu, W. F. & Chen, C. S. Cell polarity triggered by cell-Cell adhesion via E-Cadherin. J. Cell Sci. 122, 905-911 (2009).
51. Danowski, B. A., Khodjakov, A. &Wadsworth, P. Centrosome behavior in motile HGF-Treated PtK2 cells expressing GFP-Gamma tubulin. Cell Motil Cytoskel. 50, 59-68 (2001).
52. Pouthas, F. et al. In migrating cells, the Golgi complex and the position of the centrosome depend on geometrical constraints of the substratum. J. Cell Sci. 121, 2406-2414 (2008).
53. Qin, D., Xia, Y. & Whitesides, G. M. Soft lithography for micro-And nanoscale patterning. Nat. Protoc. 5, 491-502 (2010).