Combining forecasts: An application to elections

International Journal of Forecasting

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 43-54

  Graefe, Andreas ^a   Armstrong, J Scott ^b,c   Jones, Randall J ^d   Cuzán, Alfred G ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WEST FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Combining; Econometric models; Election forecasting; Expert judgment; Polls; Prediction markets

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885061359     PISSN: 01692070     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2013.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Abramowitz A.I. Forecasting in a polarized era: the time for change model and the 2012 presidential election. PS: Political Science and Politics 2012, 45:618-619.
2. Anderson L.R., Holt C.A. Information cascades in the laboratory. American Economic Review 1997, 87:847-862.
3. Armstrong J.S. Combining forecasts. Principles of forecasting: a handbook for researchers and practitioners 2001, 417-439. Kluwer, Norwell. J.S. Armstrong (Ed.).
4. Armstrong J.S. Significance tests harm progress in forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting 2007, 23:321-327.
5. Armstrong J.S., Graefe A. Predicting elections from biographical information about candidates: a test of the index method. Journal of Business Research 2011, 64:699-706.
6. Bartels L.M., Zaller J. Presidential vote models: a recount. PS: Political Science and Politics 2001, 34:9-20.
7. Batchelor R. Bias in macroeconomic forecasts. International Journal of Forecasting 2007, 23:189-203.
8. Batchelor R., Dua P. Forecaster diversity and the benefits of combining forecasts. Management Science 1995, 41:68-75.
9. Bates J.M., Granger C.W.J. The combination of forecasts. Operational Research Quarterly 1969, 20:451-468.
10. Berg J.E., Nelson F.D., Rietz T.A. Prediction market accuracy in the long run. International Journal of Forecasting 2008, 24:285-300.
11. Berry M.J., Bickers K.N. Forecasting the 2012 presidential election with state-level economic indicators. PS: Political Science and Politics 2012, 45:669-674.
12. Campbell J.E. Polls and votes: the trial-heat presidential election forecasting model, certainty, and political campaigns. American Politics Quarterly 1996, 24:408-433.
13. Campbell J.E. The exceptional election of 2008: performance, values, and crisis. Presidential Studies Quarterly 2010, 40:225-246.
14. Campbell J.E. Forecasting the presidential and congressional elections of 2012: the trial-heat and the seats-in-trouble models. PS: Political Science and Politics 2012, 45:630-634.
15. Campbell J.E., Garand J.C. Before the vote. Forecasting American national elections 2000, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
16. Campbell J.E., Wink K.A. Trial-heat forecasts of the popular vote. American Politics Quarterly 1990, 18:251-269.
17. Clemen R.T. Combining forecasts: a review and annotated bibliography. International Journal of Forecasting 1989, 5:559-583.
18. Collopy F., Armstrong J.S. Rule-based forecasting: development and validation of an expert systems approach to combining time series extrapolations. Management Science 1992, 38:1394-1414.
19. Cuzán A.G. Forecasting the 2012 presidential election with the fiscal model. PS: Political Science and Politics 2012, 45:648-650.
20. Cuzán A.G., Armstrong J.S., Jones R.J. How we computed the PollyVote. Foresight: The International Journal of Applied Forecasting 2005, 1:51-52.
21. Dalrymple D.J. Sales forecasting practices: results from a United States survey. International Journal of Forecasting 1987, 3:379-391.
22. Dawes R.M. The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist 1979, 34:571-582.
23. DeSart J.A., Holbrook T.M. Statewide trial-heat polls and the 2000 presidential election: a forecast model. Social Science Quarterly 2003, 84:561-573.
24. Einhorn H.J., Hogarth R.M. Unit weighting schemes for decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 1975, 13:171-192.
25. Erikson R.S., Bafumi J., Wilson B. Was the 2000 presidential election predictable?. PS: Political Science and Politics 2001, 34:815-819.
26. Erikson R.S., Wlezien C. Presidential polls as a time series: the case of 1996. Public Opinion Quarterly 1999, 63:163-177.
27. Erikson R.S., Wlezien C. Are political markets really superior to polls as election predictors?. Public Opinion Quarterly 2008, 72:190-215.
28. Erikson R.S., Wlezien C. The objective and subjective economy and the presidential vote. PS: Political Science and Politics 2012, 45:620-624.
29. Erikson R.S., Wlezien C. Markets vs. polls as election predictors: an historical assessment. Electoral Studies 2012, 31:532-539.
30. Fair R.C. Presidential and congressional vote-share equations. American Journal of Political Science 2009, 53:55-72.
31. Galton F. Composite portraits, made by combining those of many different persons into a single resultant figure. Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 1879, 8:132-144.
32. Genre V., Kenny G., Meyler A., Timmermann A. Combining expert forecasts: can anything beat the simple average?. International Journal of Forecasting 2013, 29:108-121.
33. Gott J.R., Colley W.N. Median statistics in polling. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 2008, 48:1396-1408.
34. Graefe A. Issue and leader voting in US presidential elections. Electoral Studies 2012, 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.04.003.
35. Graefe, A. (2013). Conditions of ensemble Bayesian model averaging for political forecasting. Working Paper. Available at. http://ssrn.com/abstract%3D2266307.
36. Graefe A., Armstrong J.S. Conditions under which index models are useful: reply to bio-index commentaries. Journal of Business Research 2011, 64:693-695.
37. Graefe A., Armstrong J.S. Predicting elections from the most important issue: a test of the take-the-best heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2012, 25:41-48.
38. Graefe A., Armstrong J.S. Forecasting elections from voters' perceptions of candidates' ability to handle issues. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2012, 10.1002/bdm.1764.
39. Graefe A., Armstrong J.S., Cuzán A.G., Jones R.J. Combined forecasts of the 2008 election: the Pollyvote. Foresight: The International Journal of Applied Forecasting 2009, 12:41-42.
40. Graefe A., Armstrong J.S., Jones R.J., Cuzán A.G. Combined forecasts of the 2012 election: the Pollyvote. Foresight: The International Journal of Applied Forecasting 2013, 28:50-51.
41. Haynes S., Stone J.A. A disaggregate approach to economic models of voting in US presidential elections: forecasts of the 2008 election. Economics Bulletin 2008, 4:1-11.
42. Herzog S.M., Hertwig R. The wisdom of many in one mind: improving individual judgments with dialectical bootstrapping. Psychological Science 2009, 20:231-237.
43. Hibbs D.A. Obama's reelection prospects under "bread and peace" voting in the 2012 US presidential election. PS: Political Science and Politics 2012, 45:635-639.
44. Hibon M., Evgeniou T. To combine or not to combine: selecting among forecasts and their combinations. International Journal of Forecasting 2005, 21:15-24.
45. Hogarth R. When simple is hard to accept. Ecological rationality: intelligence in the world 2012, 61-79. Oxford University Press, Oxford. P.M. Todd, G. Gigerenzer, The ABC Research Group (Eds.).
46. Holbrook T.M. Forecasting US presidential elections. The Oxford handbook of American elections and political behavior 2010, 346-371. Oxford University Press, Oxford. J.E. Leighley (Ed.).
47. Holbrook T.M. Incumbency, national conditions, and the 2012 presidential election. PS: Political Science and Politics 2012, 45:640-643.
48. Jerôme B., Jerôme-Speziari V. Forecasting the 2012 US presidential election: lessons from a state-by-state political economy model. PS: Political Science and Politics 2012, 45:663-668.
49. Jones R.J. Who will be in the White House? Predicting presidential elections 2002, Longman Publishers, New York.
50. Jones R.J., Cuzán A.G. Forecasting US presidential elections: a brief review. Foresight: The International Journal of Applied Forecasting 2008, 10:29-34.
51. Jose V.R.R., Winkler R.L. Simple robust averages of forecasts: some empirical results. International Journal of Forecasting 2008, 24:163-169.
52. Kernell S. Life before polls: Ohio politicians predict the 1828 presidential vote. PS: Political Science and Politics 2000, 33:569-574.
53. Klarner C. State-level forecasts of the 2012 Federal and Gubernatorial elections. PS: Political Science and Politics 2012, 45:655-662.
54. Lahiri K., Sheng X. Measuring forecast uncertainty by disagreement: the missing link. Journal of Applied Econometrics 2010, 25:514-538.
55. Larrick R.P., Soll J.B. Intuitions about combining opinions: misappreciation of the averaging principle. Management Science 2006, 52:111-127.
56. Levins R. The strategy of model building in population biology. American Scientist 1966, 54:421-431.
57. Lewis-Beck M.S., Rice T.W. Forecasting elections 1992, Congressional Quarterly Press, Washington, DC.
58. Lewis-Beck M.S., Tien C. Election forecasting for turbulent times. PS: Political Science and Politics 2012, 45:625-629.
59. Lichtman A.J. The keys to the White House: an index forecast for 2008. International Journal of Forecasting 2008, 24:301-309.
60. Lockerbie B. Economic expectations and election outcomes: the presidency and the house in 2012. PS: Political Science and Politics 2012, 45:644-647.
61. Montgomery J.M., Hollenbach F.M., Ward M.D. Improving predictions using ensemble Bayesian model averaging. Political Analysis 2012, 20:271-291.
62. National Industrial Conference Board (1963). Forecasting sales. Studies in business policy, No. 106. New York.
63. Norpoth H., Bednarczuk M. History and primary: the Obama reelection. PS: Political Science and Politics 2012, 45:614-617.
64. PoKempner S.J., Bailey E. Sales forecasting practices 1970, The Conference Board, New York.
65. Rhode P.W., Strumpf K.S. Historical presidential betting markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2004, 18:127-141.
66. Sigelman L. Predicting the 1992 election. Political Methodologist 1994, 5:14-15.
67. Smith J., Wallis K.F. A simple explanation of the forecast combination puzzle. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 2009, 71:331-355.
68. Soll J.B., Larrick R.P. Strategies for revising judgment: how (and how well) people use others' opinions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:780-805.
69. Stock J.H., Watson M.W. Combination forecasts of output growth in a seven-country data set. Journal of Forecasting 2004, 23:405-430.
70. Vul E., Pashler H. Measuring the crowd within: probabilistic representations within individuals. Psychological Science 2008, 19:645-647.
71. Winkler R.L., Clemen R.T. Multiple experts vs. multiple methods: combining correlation assessments. Decision Analysis 2004, 1:167-176.
72. Wlezien C. Presidential elections polls in 2000: a study in dynamics. Presidential Studies Quarterly 2003, 33:172-186.
73. Wolfe H.D. Business forecasting methods 1966, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
74. Zajonc R.B. A note on group judgments and group size. Human Relations 1962, 15:177-180.