Statewide Trial-Heat Polls and the 2000 Presidential Election: A Forecast Model

Social Science Quarterly

Volumn 84, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 561-573

  DeSart, Jay A ^a   Holbrook, Thomas M ^b  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041376966     PISSN: 00384941     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1540-6237.8403005     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Abramowitz, Alan. 2001. "The Time for Change Model and the 2000 Election." American Politics Research 29:279-82.
2. Campbell, James E. 2001a. "An Evaluation of the Trial-Heat and Economy Forecast of the Presidential Vote in the 2000 Elections." American Politics Research 29:289-96.
3. _. 2001b. "Taking Stock of the Forecasts of the 2000 Presidential Election." American Politics Research 29:275-78.
4. _. 2001c. "The Curious and Close Presidential Campaign of 2000." In William Crotty, ed., America's Choice 2000. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.
5. DeSart, Jay A., and Thomas Holbrook. Forthcoming. "Campaigns, Polls and the States: Assessing the Accuracy of Statewide Presidential Trial-Heat Polls." Political Research Quarterly.
6. Frankovic, Kathleen A., and Monika L. McDermott. 2001. "Public Opinion in the 2000 Election: The Ambivalent Electorate." In Gerald M. Pomper et al., The Election of 1992: Reports and Interpretations. New York: Chatham House.
7. Holbrook, Thomas M. 2001. "(Mis)Reading the Political Tea Leaves." American Politics Research 29:297-301.
8. Holbrook, Thomas M., and Jay A. DeSart. 1999. "Using State Polls to Forecast Presidential Election Outcomes in the American States." International Journal of Forecasting 15:137-42.
9. Jones Jr., Randall J. 2001. Who Will Be in the White House? Predicting Presidential Elections. New York: Longman.
10. Lockerbie, Brad. 2001. "Forecast 2000: An Afterthought." American Politics Research 29:307-12.
11. Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Tom W. Rice. 1992. Forecasting Elections. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
12. Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Charles Tien. 2001. "Election 2000: How Wrong Was the Forecast?" American Politics Research 29:302-06.
13. Norpoth, Helmut. 2001. '"Of Time and Candidates' Revisited: Too Generous for Al Gore." American Politics Research 29:313-19.
14. Wlezien, Christopher, and Robert S. Erikson. 2001. "After the Election: Our Forecast in Retrospect." American Politics Research 29:320-28.