Variation in the Form of Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Behavior among Outbred Male Sprague-Dawley Rats from Different Vendors and Colonies: Sign-Tracking vs. Goal-Tracking

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 10, 2013, Pages

  Fitzpatrick, Christopher J ^a   Gopalakrishnan, Shyam ^b   Cogan, Elizabeth S ^a   Yager, Lindsay M ^a   Meyer, Paul J ^a   Lovic, Vedran ^a   Saunders, Benjamin T ^a   Parker, Clarissa C ^b   Gonzales, Natalia M ^b   Aryee, Emmanuel ^b   Flagel, Shelly B ^a,c   Palmer, Abraham A ^b   Robinson, Terry E ^a   Morrow, Jonathan D ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BEHAVIOR; BOTTLENECK POPULATION; CONDITIONED REFLEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FOOD; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; GOAL TRACKING; MALE; NONHUMAN; ORGANISM COLONY; OUTBRED STRAIN; PHENOTYPE; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; POPULATION STRUCTURE; PREDICTION; RAT; SIGN TRACKING; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BREEDING; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); GOALS; MALE; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84885030497     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075042     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Silver LM (1995) Mouse Genetics: Concepts and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Festing MF, (2010) Inbred strains should replace outbred stocks in toxicology, safety testing, and drug development. Toxicol Pathol 38: 681-690.
3. Glick SD, Shapiro RM, Drew KL, Hinds PA, Carlson JN, (1986) Differences in spontaneous and amphetamine-induced rotational behavior, and in sensitization to amphetamine, among Sprague-Dawley derived rats from different sources. Physiol Behav 38: 67-70.
4. Pollock DM, Rekito A, (1998) Hypertensive response to chronic NO synthase inhibition is different in Sprague-Dawley rats from two suppliers. Am J Physiol 275: R1719-1723.
5. Buhimschi IA, Shi SQ, Saade GR, Garfield RE, (2001) Marked variation in responses to long-term nitric oxide inhibition during pregnancy in outbred rats from two different colonies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184: 686-693.
6. Bueno A, de Olmos S, Manzini F, Desmond NL, de Olmos J, (2003) Strain and colony differences in the neurotoxic sequelae of MK-801 visualized with the amino-cupric-silver method. Exp Toxicol Pathol 55: 287-294.
7. Miller FP, Cox RH Jr, Maickel RP, (1968) Intrastrain difference in serotonin and norepinephrine in discrete areas of rat brain. Science 162: 463-464.
8. Pecoraro N, Ginsberg AB, Warne JP, Gomez F, la Fleur SE, et al. (2006) Diverse basal and stress-related phenotypes of Sprague Dawley rats from three vendors. Physiol Behav 89: 598-610.
9. Oliff HS, Coyle P, Weber E, (1997) Rat strain and vendor differences in collateral anastomoses. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 17: 571-576.
10. Fuller DD, Baker TL, Behan M, Mitchell GS, (2001) Expression of hypoglossal long-term facilitation differs between substrains of Sprague-Dawley rat. Physiol Genomics 4: 175-181.
11. Pare WP, Kluczynski J, (1997) Differences in the stress response of Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats from different vendors. Physiol Behav 62: 643-648.
12. Bert B, Fink H, Sohr R, Rex A, (2001) Different effects of diazepam in Fischer rats and two stocks of Wistar rats in tests of anxiety. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 70: 411-420.
13. Marosi M, Rakos G, Robotka H, Nemeth H, Sas K, et al. (2006) Hippocampal (CA1) activities in Wistar rats from different vendors. Fundamental differences in acute ischemia. J Neurosci Methods 156: 231-235.
14. Honndorf S, Lindemann C, Tollner K, Gernert M, (2011) Female Wistar rats obtained from different breeders vary in anxiety-like behavior and epileptogenesis. Epilepsy Res 94: 26-38.
15. Swerdlow NR, Platten A, Kim YK, Gaudet I, Shoemaker J, et al. (2001) Sensitivity to the dopaminergic regulation of prepulse inhibition in rats: evidence for genetic, but not environmental determinants. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 70: 219-226.
16. Robinson TE, Flagel SB, (2009) Dissociating the predictive and incentive motivational properties of reward-related cues through the study of individual differences. Biol Psychiatry 65: 869-873.
17. Flagel SB, Clark JJ, Robinson TE, Mayo L, Czuj A, et al. (2011) A selective role for dopamine in stimulus-reward learning. Nature 469: 53-57.
18. Saunders BT, Robinson TE, (2011) Individual variation in the motivational properties of cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology 36: 1668-1676.
19. Yager LM, Robinson TE, (2010) Cue-induced reinstatement of food seeking in rats that differ in their propensity to attribute incentive salience to food cues. Behav Brain Res 214: 30-34.
20. Saunders BT, Robinson TE, (2010) A cocaine cue acts as an incentive stimulus in some but not others: implications for addiction. Biol Psychiatry 67: 730-736.
21. Peterson BK, Weber JN, Kay EH, Fisher HS, Hoekstra HE, (2012) Double digest RADseq: an inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species. PLoS One 7: e37135.
22. Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q, Poland JA, Kawamoto K, et al. (2011) A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One 6: e19379.
23. Li H, Durbin R, (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25: 1754-1760.
24. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, et al. (2009) The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25: 2078-2079.
25. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P, (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
26. Meyer PJ, Lovic V, Saunders BT, Yager LM, Flagel SB, et al. (2012) Quantifying individual variation in the propensity to attribute incentive salience to reward cues. PLoS One 7: e38987.
27. Kearns DN, Gomez-Serrano MA, Weiss SJ, Riley AL, (2006) A comparison of Lewis and Fischer rat strains on autoshaping (sign-tracking), discrimination reversal learning and negative auto-maintenance. Behav Brain Res 169: 193-200.
28. Flagel SB, Robinson TE, Clark JJ, Clinton SM, Watson SJ, et al. (2010) An animal model of genetic vulnerability to behavioral disinhibition and responsiveness to reward-related cues: implications for addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology 35: 388-400.
29. Lovic V, Keen D, Fletcher PJ, Fleming AS, (2011) Early-life maternal separation and social isolation produce an increase in impulsive action but not impulsive choice. Behav Neurosci 125: 481-491.
30. Beckmann JS, Bardo MT, (2012) Environmental enrichment reduces attribution of incentive salience to a food-associated stimulus. Behav Brain Res 226: 331-334.
31. Hoger H, (1992) Genetic drift in an outbred stock of mice. Jikken Dobutsu 41: 215-220.
32. Papaioannou VE, Festing MF, (1980) Genetic drift in a stock of laboratory mice. Lab Anim 14: 11-13.
33. Aldinger KA, Sokoloff G, Rosenberg DM, Palmer AA, Millen KJ, (2009) Genetic variation and population substructure in outbred CD-1 mice: implications for genome-wide association studies. PLoS One 4: e4729.
34. Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (2011) International Genetic Standardization (IGS) Program. Retrieved from http://www.criver.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/rm_rm_r_IGS.pdf. Accessed 16 March 2013.
35. Shim S, Lee S, Kim C, Kim B, Jee S, et al. (2009) Effects of air transportation cause physiological and biochemical changes indicative of stress leading to regulation of chaperone expression levels and corticosterone concentration. Exp Anim 58: 11-17.
36. Tomie A, Lincks M, Nadarajah SD, Pohorecky LA, Yu L, (2012) Pairings of lever and food induce Pavlovian conditioned approach of sign-tracking and goal-tracking in C57BL/6 mice. Behav Brain Res 226: 571-578.
37. Flagel SB, Akil H, Robinson TE, (2009) Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction. Neuropharmacology 56Suppl 1: 139-148.
38. Turnbull AV, Rivier CL, (1999) Sprague-Dawley rats obtained from different vendors exhibit distinct adrenocorticotropin responses to inflammatory stimuli. Neuroendocrinology 70: 186-195.
39. Chesler EJ, Wilson SG, Lariviere WR, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Mogil JS, (2002) Influences of laboratory environment on behavior. Nat Neurosci 5: 1101-1102.
40. Crabbe JC, Wahlsten D, Dudek BC, (1999) Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment. Science 284: 1670-1672.
41. Chia R, Achilli F, Festing MF, Fisher EM, (2005) The origins and uses of mouse outbred stocks. Nat Genet 37: 1181-1186.