Comparison of postoperative pain between single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Prospective case-control study

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 25-28

  Wong, Jeff Siu Wang ^a   Cheung, Yue Sun ^a   Fong, Kwong Wai ^a   Chong, Charing Ching Ning ^a   Lee, Kit Fai ^a   Wong, John ^a   Lai, Paul Bo San ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

laparoscopic cholecystectomy; postoperative pain; single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; MORPHINE; TRAMADOL;

ADULT; AGED; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT INJURY; BILE LEAKAGE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CYSTIC ARTERY BLEEDING; DRUG USE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SELF EVALUATION; SINGLE INCISION LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WOUND INFECTION;

ADULT; AGED; ANALGESICS, OPIOID; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; FEMALE; GALLBLADDER DISEASES; GALLSTONES; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PILOT PROJECTS; POLYPS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TRAMADOL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84863137428     PISSN: 15304515     EISSN: 15344908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318242ea44     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Carr A, Bhavaraju A, Goza J, et al. Initial experience with single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg. 2010;76: 703-707.
2. Curcillo PG 2nd, Wu AS, Podolsky ER, et al. Single-port-access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional report of the first 297 cases. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1854-1860.
3. Erbella J Jr, Bunch GM. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystec-tomy: the first 100 outpatients. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1958-1961.
4. Hernandez JM, Morton CA, Ross S, et al. Laparoendoscopic single site cholecystectomy: the first 100 patients. Am Surg. 2009;75:681-685.
5. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205-213. (Pubitemid 38963009)
6. Poon CM, Chan KW, Lee DW, et al. Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2003;17: 1624-1627.
7. Novitsky YW, Kercher KW, Czerniach DR, et al. Advantages of mini-laparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystec-tomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg. 2005;140:1178-1183. (Pubitemid 41815900)
8. Lee PC, Lo C, Lai PS, et al. Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1007-1012.
9. Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G, et al. Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparo-scopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystec-tomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2010;24: 1842-1848.