Impact of single-port cholecystectomy on postoperative pain

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 98, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 991-995

  Asakuma, M ^a   Hayashi, M ^a   Komeda, K ^a   Shimizu, T ^a   Hirokawa, F ^a   Miyamoto, Y ^a   Okuda, J ^a   Tanigawa, N ^a  

^a OSAKA MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GALLBLADDER DISEASE; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; FEMALE; GALLBLADDER DISEASES; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79957777297     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7486     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Inoue H, Takeshita K, Endo M,. Single-port laparoscopy assisted appendectomy under local pneumoperitoneum condition. Surg Endosc 1994; 8: 714-716.
2. Matsuda T, Ogura K, Uchida J, Fujita I, Terachi T, Yoshida O,. Smaller ports result in shorter convalescence after laparoscopic varicocelectomy. J Urol 1995; 153: 1175-1177.
3. Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I,. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 695. (Pubitemid 27208304)
4. Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D,. Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 2007; 142: 823-826. (Pubitemid 47437294)
5. Asakuma M, Perretta S, Allemann P, Cahill R, Con SA, Solano C, et al., Challenges and lessons learned from NOTES cholecystectomy initial experience: a stepwise approach from the laboratory to clinical application. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2009; 16: 249-254.
6. Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Allemann P, Asakuma M, Marescaux J,. Transgastric hybrid cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 1162-1166.
7. Mutter D, Leroy J, Cahill R, Marescaux J,. A simple technical option for single-port cholecystectomy. Surg Innov 2008; 15: 332-333.
8. Leroy J, Cahill RA, Asakuma M, Dallemagne B, Marescaux J,. Single-access laparoscopic sigmoidectomy as definitive surgical management of prior diverticulitis in a human patient. Arch Surg 2009; 144: 173-179.
9. Aitken RC,. Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proc R Soc Med 1969; 62: 989-993.
10. Hayashi M, Asakuma M, Komeda K, Miyamoto Y, Hirokawa F, Tanigawa N,. Effectiveness of a surgical glove port for single port surgery. World J Surg 2010; 34: 2487-2489.
11. Sun S, Yang K, Gao M, He X, Tian J, Ma B,. Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. World J Surg 2009; 33: 1904-1908.
12. Trichak S,. Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 1434-1436.
13. Cerci C, Tarhan OR, Barut I, Bülbül M,. Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 2007; 54: 15-16. (Pubitemid 46511637)
14. Kumar M, Agrawal CS, Gupta RK,. Three-port versus standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial in a community-based teaching hospital in eastern Nepal. JSLS 2007; 11: 358-362.
15. Gupta A, Shrivastava UK, Kumar P, Burman D,. Minilaparoscopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Trop Gastroenterol 2005; 26: 149-151.
16. Poon CM, Chan KW, Lee DW, Chan KC, Ko CW, Cheung HY, et al., Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 1624-1627.
17. Leung KF, Lee KW, Cheung TY, Leung LC, Lau KW,. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: two-port technique. Endoscopy 1996; 28: 505-507. (Pubitemid 26306015)
18. Lee PC, Lo C, Lai PS, Chang JJ, Huang SJ, Lin MT, et al., Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 1007-1012.