Single-port versus multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized clinical trial

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 396-399

  Sasaki, Akira ^a   Ogawa, Masaaki ^b   Tono, Chihiro ^c   Obara, Shin ^d   Hosoi, Nobuyuki ^e   Wakabayashi, Go ^a  

^a IWATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Department of Surgery   (Japan)

^c Kuji Prefectural Hospital   (Japan)

^d Kamaishi Prefectural Hospital   (Japan)

^e IWATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

cholecystectomy; laparoscopy; single port surgery

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT;

ADULT; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; BILE SPILLAGE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ESCHERICHIA COLI INFECTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LIVER DYSFUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; FEMALE; GALLBLADDER DISEASES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84867887190     PISSN: 15304515     EISSN: 15344908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182631a9a     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. McMahon AJ, Russell IT, Baxter JN, et al. Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomized trial. Lancet. 1994;343:135-138.
2. Berggren U, Gordh T, Grama D, et al. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: hospitalization, sick leave, analgesia and trauma responses. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1362-1365.
3. Reardon PR, Kamelgard JI, Applebaum B, et al. Feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with miniaturized instrumentation in 50 consecutive cases. World J Surg. 1999;23:128-131.
4. Sarli L, lusco D, Gobbi S, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with mini-instruments. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1345-1348.
5. Lee PC, Lai IR, Yu SC. Minilaparoscopic (needlescopic) cholecystectomy: a study of 1, 011 cases. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1480-1484.
6. Novitsky YW, Kercher KW, Czerniach DR, et al. Advantages of mini-laparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecys-tectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg. 2005;140:1178-1183.
7. Hodgett SE, Hernandez JM, Morton CA, et al. Laparoendo-scopic single site (LESS) cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:188-192.
8. Lee PC, Lo C, Lai PS, et al. Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1007-1012.
9. Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G, et al. Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparo-scopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecys-tectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1842-1848.
10. Khambaty F, Brody F, Vaziri K, et al. Laparoscopic versus single-incision cholecystectomy. World J Surg. 2011;35:967-972.
11. Sasaki A, Nakajima J, Nitta H, et al. Laparoscopic cholecys-tectomy in patients with a history of gastrectomy. Surg Today. 2008;38:790-794.
12. Nakajima J, Sasaki A, Obuchi T, et al. Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for severe cholecystitis. Surg Today. 2009;39:870-875.
13. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180:101-125.
14. Ko CW, Kalloo AN. Per-oral transgastric abdominal surgery. Chin J Dig Dis. 2006;7:67-70.
15. Baron TH. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1-2.
16. Fronza JS, Linn JG, Nagle AP, et al. A single institution's experience with single incision cholecystectomy compared to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery. 2010;148:731-734.
17. Merchant AM, Cook MW, White BC, et al. Transumbilical Gelport access technique for performing single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:159-162.
18. Nguyen NT, Reavis KM, Hinojosa MW, et al. Laparoscopic transumbilical cholecystectomy without visible abdominal scars. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:1125-1128.
19. Rivas H, Varela E, Scott D. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patients. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1403-1412.
20. Chang SK, Tay CW, Bicol RA, et al. A case-control study of single-incision versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg. 2011;35:289-293.
21. Mutter D, Callari C, Diana M, et al. Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: which technique, which surgeon, for which patient? A study of the implementation in a teaching hospital. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011;18:453-457.
22. Osborne D, Boe B, Rosemurgy AS, et al. Twenty-millimeter laparoscopic cholecystectomy: fewer ports results in less pain, shorter hospitalization, and faster recovery. Am Surg. 2005;71:298-302.
23. Ma J, Cassera MA, Spaun GO, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2011;254:22-27.