Seed size and shape analysis of registered common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars in Turkey using digital photography;Türkiye'de tescilli fasulye (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) çeşitlerinin dijital fotoǧraflama kullanılarak boyut ve şekil analizi

Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 219-234

  Kara, Mazhar ^a   Sayinci, Bahadir ^a   Elkoca, Erdal ^a   Öztürk, Ismail ^a   Özmen, Talha Bekir ^a  

^a ATATÜRK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Bean; Image processing; Projected area; Shape; Sphericity

Indexed keywords

ELLIPTICUS; PHASEOLUS VULGARIS;

EID: 84885025755     PISSN: 13007580     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1501/tarimbil_0000001247     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abdullah M Z, Mohamad-Saleh J, Fathinul-Syahir AS & Mohd-Azemi B M N (2006). Discrimination and classification of fresh-cut starfruits (Averrhoa carambola L.) using automated machine vision system. Journal of Food Engineering 76: 506-523
2. Beyer M, Hahn R, Peschel S, Harz M & Knoche M (2002). Analysing fruit shape in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Scientia Horticulturae 96: 139-150
3. Boydas M G, Sayinci B, Gozlekci S, Oztürk I & Ercisli S (2012). Basic physical properties of fruits in loquat (Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb. Lindl.) cultivars and genotypes determined by both classical method and digital image processing. African Journal of Agricultural Research 7(29): 4171-4181
4. Cetin M (2007). Physical properties of barbunia bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. 'Barbunia') seed. Journal of Food Engineering 80: 353-358
5. Costa C, Antonucci F, Pallottino F, Aguzzi J, Sun D W & Menesatti P (2011). Shape analysis of agricultural products: a review of recent research advances and potential application to computer vision. Food and Bioprocess Technology 4(5): 673-692
6. Ercisli S, Sayinci B, Kara M, Yildiz C & Ozturk I (2012). Determination of size and shape features of walnut (Juglans regia L.) cultivars using i{dotless}mage processing. Scientia Horticulturae 133, 47-55
7. FAOSTAT data (2012). http://faostat. fao. org/site/567/default. aspx#ancor-Production. Crops (accessed 01. 02. 2013)
8. Fi{dotless}ratli{dotless}gil-Durmuş E, Šárka E, Bubník Z, Schejbal M & Kadlec P (2010). Size properties of legume seeds of different varieties using image analysis. Journal of Food Engineering 99(4): 445-451
9. Güvenç İ & Güngör F (1996). Türkiye'de tescilli fasulye çeşitlerine ait tohumlari{dotless}n fiziksel özellikleri ve besin bileşimleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 27(4): 524-529
10. IBM SPSS® Statistics (2010). IBM Company© Version 19, SSS Inc.
11. Jahns G, Nielsen H M & Paul W (2001). Measuring image analysis attributes and modelling fuzzy consumer aspects for tomato quality grading. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 31: 17-29
12. Kara M (2012). Biyolojik Ürünlerin Fiziksel Özellikleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Yayi{dotless}nlari{dotless} No: 242, Erzurum, 397s (in Turkish)
13. Kays S J (1991). Postharvest Physiology of Perishable Plant Products. Van Nostrand Reinholt, New York (cited by Kays, 1999)
14. Kays S J (1999). Preharvest factors affecting appearance. Postharvest Biology and Technology 15: 233-247
15. Koc A B (2007). Determination of watermelon volume using ellipsoid approximation and image processing. Postharvest Biology and Technology 45: 366-371
16. McCabe W L, Smith J C & Harriot P (1986). Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York
17. Mohsenin N N (1986). Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials. Gordon and Breach Science Publisher, New York
18. Morimoto T, Takeuchi T, Miyata H & Hashimoto Y (2000). Pattern recognition of fruit shape based on the concept of chaos and neural networks. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 26: 171-186
19. Olajide J O & Ade-Omowaye B I O (1999). Some physical properties of locust bean seed. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 74(2): 213-215
20. Omid M, Khojastehnazhand M & Tabatabaeefar A (2010). Estimating volume and mass of citrus fruits by image processing technique. Journal of Food Engineering 100: 315-321
21. Ozturk I, Kara M, Ercisli S & Kantar F (2010). Physical and chemical grain properties of new registered common bean cv. 'Kantar-05'. Akademi Sains Malaysia 39(5): 725-730
22. Rashidi M, Gholami M & Abbassi S (2009). Cantaloupe volume determination through image processing. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 11: 623-631
23. Sadrnia H, Rajabipour A, Jafary A, Javadi A & Mostofi Y (2007). Classification and analysis of fruit shape in long type watermelon using image processing. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 1: 68-70
24. Sayinci B, Ercisli S, Ozturk I, Eryilmaz Z & Demir B (2012). Determination of size and shape in the 'Moro' blood orange and 'Valencia' sweet orange cultivar and its mutants using image processing. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 40(1): 234-242
25. SigmaScan®Pro (2004). SigmaScan®Pro 5. 0 User's Manual. Systat Software Inc., 501 Canal Blvd. Suite E, Point Richmond, CA 94804
26. Şehrali S (1988). Yemeklik Tane Baklagiller. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayi{dotless}n No: 1089, Ders Kitabi{dotless} No: 314, Ankara
27. Wycislo A P, Clark J R & Karcher D E (2008). Fruit shape analysis of vitis using digital photography. HortScience 43(3): 677-680
28. Van Eck J W, Heijden G W A M & Polder G (1998). Accurate measurement of size and shape of cucumber fruits with image analysis. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 70: 335-343
29. Venora G, Grillo O, Shahin M A & Symons S J (2007). Identification of Sicilian landraces and Canadian cultivars of lentil using an image analysis system. Food Research International 40: 161-166
30. Yurtlu Y B & Yeşiloǧlu E (2011). Mechanical behaviour and split resistance of chestnut under compressive loading. Tari{dotless}m Bilimleri Dergisi-Journal of Agricultural Sciences 17(4): 337-346