Stakeholder salience changes in an e-government implementation project

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8074 LNCS, Issue , 2013, Pages 237-249

  Axelsson, Karin ^a   Melin, Ulf ^a   Lindgren, Ida ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

e government implementation; e government project; IT driven change; stakeholder salience

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING;

AGENCY EMPLOYEES; E-GOVERNMENT IMPLEMENTATION; GOVERNMENT PROJECTS; IMPLEMENTATION PHASIS; IT DRIVEN CHANGE; STAKEHOLDER GROUPS; STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT; STAKEHOLDER SALIENCE;

E-GOVERNMENT;

EID: 84884992429     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40358-3_20     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Axelsson, K., Melin, U., Lindgren, I.: Public e-services for agency efficiency and citizen benefit-Findings from a stakeholder centered analysis. Government Information Quarterly 30(1), 10-22 (2013)
2. Barley, S.R.: Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly 31(1), 78-108 (1986)
3. Cavaye, A.: User Participation in System Development Revisited. Information and Management 28(5), 311-323 (1995)
4. Heeks, R.: The Tyranny of Participation in Information Systems: Learning from Development Projects, Working Paper Series No. 4. Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester, UK (1999)
5. Ho, J., Pardo, T.A.: Toward the Success of eGovernment Initiatives: Mapping Known Success Factors to the Design of Practical Tools. In: Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, pp. 1-6. IEEE (2004)
6. Howcroft, D., Wilson, M.: Paradoxes of participatory practices: the Janus role of the systems developer. Information and Organization 13(1), 1-24 (2003)
7. Kamal, M., Weerakkody, V., Irani, Z.: Analyzing the role of stakeholders in the adoption of technology integration solutions in UK local government: an exploratory study. Government Information Quarterly 28(2), 200-210 (2011)
8. Kim, H.-W., Kankanhalli, A.: Investigating User Resistance to Information Systems Implementation: A Status Quo Bias Perspective. MIS Quarterly 33(3), 567-582 (2009)
9. Land, F.: Evaluation in a socio-technical context. In: Baskerville, R., Stage, J., DeGross, J.I. (eds.) Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology, pp. 115-126. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2000)
10. Lapointe, L., Rivard, S.: A Multiple Model of Resistance to Information Technology Implementation. MIS Quarterly 29(3), 461-491 (2005)
11. Leonardi, P.M.: Why Do People Reject New Technologies and Stymie Organizational Changes of Which They Are in Favor? Exploring Misalignments Between Social Interactions and Materiality. Human Communication Research 35(3), 407-441 (2009)
12. Leonardi, P.M., Barley, S.R.: Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Information and Organization 18(3), 159-176 (2008)
13. Lynch, T., Gregor, S.: User participation in decision support systems development: Influencing system outcomes. European Journal of Information Systems 13(4), 286-301 (2004)
14. Marakas, G.M., Hornik, S.: Passive resistance misuse: Overt support and covert recalcitrance in IS implementation. European Journal of Information Systems 5(3), 208-220 (1996)
15. Markus, M.L.: Technochange Management: Using IT to Drive Organizational Change. Journal of Information Technology 19(1), 3-19 (2004)
16. Markus, M.L.: Power, politics, and misimplementation. Communications of the ACM 26(6), 430-444 (1983)
17. Markus, M.L., Robey, D.: Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research. Management Science 34(5), 583-598 (1988)
18. Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., Wood, D.J.: Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 22(4), 853-886 (1997)
19. Myers, M.D.: Qualitative Research in Business & Management. SAGE Publications, London (2009)
20. Orlikowski, W.J., Robey, D.: IT and the structuring of organizations. Information Systems Research 2(2), 143-169 (1991)
21. Reddick, C.G.: Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers? Government Information Quarterly 22(1), 38-57 (2005)
22. Reinwald, A., Kraemmergaard, P.: Managing stakeholders in transformational government-A case study in a Danish local government. Government Information Quarterly 29(2), 133-141 (2012)
23. Sefyrin, J., Mörtberg, C.: "We do not Talk about this"-Problematical Silences in e-Government. Electronic Journal of e-Government 7(3), 259-270 (2009)
24. Silverman, D.: Interpreting qualitative data, 3rd edn. SAGE, London (2006)
25. Vaast, E., Walsham, G.: Representations and actions: the transformation of work practices with IT use. Information and Organisation 15(1), 65-89 (2005)
26. Walsham, G.: Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems 15(3), 320-330 (2006)