Coached practice using ERCP mechanical simulator improves trainees' ERCP performance: A randomized controlled trial

Endoscopy

Volumn 45, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 799-805

  Liao, Wei Chih ^a,b   Leung, Josephw ^c   Wang, Hsiu Po ^a   Chang, Wen Hsinug ^d   Chu, Cheng Hsin ^d   Lin, Jaw Town ^a   Wilson, Roberte ^c   Lim, Brians ^c,e   Leung, Felixw ^f  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d MACKAY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^e KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANNULATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY MECHANICAL SIMULATOR; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SIMULATION; SIMULATOR; SPHINCTEROTOMY;

CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; HUMANS; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TAIWAN; TEACHING;

EID: 84884901553     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1344224     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Adler D. G., Baron T. H., Davila R. E. et al. ASGE guideline: the role of ERCP in diseases of the biliary tract and the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc: 2005; 62 1 8 (Pubitemid 40931917)
2. Leung J. W. Fundamentals of ERCP. In: Cotton P., Leung J. W. eds. Advanced digestive endoscopy: ERCP. Malden Blackwell Publishing: 2005; 17 80
3. Andriulli A., Loperfido S., Napolitano G. et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol: 2007; 102 1781 1788 (Pubitemid 47206695)
4. Cotton P. B., Lehman G., Vennes J. et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc: 1991; 37 383 383
5. Freeman M. L., Nelson D. B., Sherman S. et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med: 1996; 335 909 918 (Pubitemid 26314443)
6. Chutkan R. K., Ahmad A. S., Cohen J. et al. ERCP core curriculum. Gastrointest Endosc: 2006; 63 361 376
7. Cotton P. B. Outcome, documentation, quality and training. In: Cotton P. B., Wiliams C. B. eds. Practical gastrointestinal endoscopy. 4th edn. Malden Blackwell Publishing: 1996; 313
8. Kowalski T., Kanchana T., Pungpapong S. Perceptions of gastroenterology fellows regarding ERCP competency and training. Gastrointest Endosc: 2003; 58 345 349 (Pubitemid 38220232)
9. Jowell P. S., Baillie J., Branch M. S. et al. Quantitative assessment of procedural competence. A prospective study of training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Ann Intern Med: 1996; 125 983 989 (Pubitemid 26424528)
10. Singh H., Thomas E. J., Petersen L. A. et al. Medical errors involving trainees: a study of closed malpractice claims from 5 insurers. Arch Intern Med: 2007; 167 2030 2036 (Pubitemid 350036701)
11. Cheng C. L., Sherman S., Watkins J. L. et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol: 2006; 101 139 147 (Pubitemid 43381722)
12. Williams E. J., Taylor S., Fairclough P. et al. Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice. Gut: 2007; 56 821 829 (Pubitemid 46854199)
13. Cotton P. B. Quality endoscopists and quality endoscopy units. J Interv Gastroenterol: 2011; 1 83 87
14. Fried G. M., Feldman L. S., Vassiliou M. C. et al. Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg: 2004; 240 518 525
15. Mayo P. H., Hackney J. E., Mueck J. T. et al. Achieving house staff competence in emergency airway management: results of a teaching program using a computerized patient simulator. Crit Care Med: 2004; 32 2422 2427 (Pubitemid 39648223)
16. Patel A. D., Gallagher A. G., Nicholson W. J. et al. Learning curves and reliability measures for virtual reality simulation in the performance assessment of carotid angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol: 2006; 47 1796 1802
17. Wayne D. B., Didwania A., Feinglass J. et al. Simulation-based education improves quality of care during cardiac arrest team responses at an academic teaching hospital: a case-control study. Chest: 2008; 133 56 61
18. Haycock A. V., Youd P., Bassett P. et al. Simulator training improves practical skills in therapeutic GI endoscopy: results from a randomized, blinded, controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc: 2009; 70 835 845
19. Leung J. W., Lee J. G., Rojany M. et al. Development of a novel ERCP mechanical simulator. Gastrointest Endosc: 2007; 65 1056 1062 (Pubitemid 46783819)
20. Frimberger E., von Delius S., Rösch T. et al. A novel and practicable ERCP training system with simulated fluoroscopy. Endoscopy: 2008; 40 517 520 (Pubitemid 351911843)
21. Leung J. W., Lee W., Wilson R. et al. Comparison of accessory performance using a novel ERCP mechanical simulator. Endoscopy: 2008; 40 983 988
22. Lim B. S., Leung J. W., Lee J. et al. Effect of ERCP mechanical simulator (EMS) practice on trainees' ERCP performance in the early learning period: US multicenter randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol: 2011; 106 300 306
23. Wicks A. C., Robertson G. S., Veitch P. S. Structured training and assessment in ERCP has become essential for the Calman era. Gut: 1999; 45 154 156 (Pubitemid 29301862)
24. Zeger S. L., Liang K. Y. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics: 1986; 42 121 130
25. Rochon J. Application of GEE procedures for sample size calculations in repeated measures experiments. Stat Med: 1998; 17 1643 1658 (Pubitemid 28367844)
26. Vandervoort J., Soetikno R. M., Tham T. C. et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc: 2002; 56 652 656 (Pubitemid 36531698)
27. Aggarwal R., Mytton O. T., Derbrew M. et al. Training and simulation for patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care: 2010; 19 i34 43
28. Maiss J., Dumser C., Zopf Y. et al. "Hemodynamic efficacyo" of two endoscopic clip devices used in the treatment of bleeding vessels, tested in an experimental setting using the compact Erlangen Active Simulator for Interventional Endoscopy (compactEASIE) training model. Endoscopy: 2006; 38 575 580 (Pubitemid 43978524)
29. Maiss J., Prat F., Wiesnet J. et al. The complementary Erlangen active simulator for interventional endoscopy training is superior to solely clinical education in endoscopic hemostasis - the French training project: a prospective trial. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2006; 18 1217 1225 (Pubitemid 44563883)
30. Kruglikova I., Grantcharov T. P., Drewes A. M. et al. The impact of constructive feedback on training in gastrointestinal endoscopy using high-fidelity Virtual-Reality simulation: a randomised controlled trial. Gut: 2010; 59 181 185
31. Ende A., Zopf Y., Konturek P. et al. Strategies for training in diagnostic upper endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc: 2012; 75 254 260
32. Mahmood T., Darzi A. The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: no feedback, no learning. Surg Endosc: 2004; 18 1224 1230 (Pubitemid 39014863)
33. Desilets D. J., Banerjee S., Barth B. A. et al. Endoscopic simulators. Gastrointest Endosc: 2011; 73 861 867
34. Leung J. W., Yen D. ERCP training - the potential role of simulation practice. J Interv Gastroenterol: 2011; 1 14 18
35. Leung J., Lim B., Ngo C. et al. Head-to-head comparison of practice with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography computer and mechanical simulators by experienced endoscopists and trainees. Dig Endosc: 2012; 24 175 181
36. Leung J. W., Wang D., Hu B. et al. A head-to-head hands-on comparison of ERCP mechanical simulator (EMS) and ex-vivo porcine stomach model (PSM). J Interv Gastroenterol: 2011; 1 108 113