Perceptions of gastroenterology fellows regarding ERCP competency and training

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 345-349

  Kowalski, Thomas ^a,b   Kanchana, Thirumaleshwar ^a   Pungpapong, Surakit ^a  

^a Main Bldg ^*

^b THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANNULATION; CLINICAL MEDICINE; COMPETENCE; CONTINUING EDUCATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; GASTROENTEROLOGY; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; REVIEW; SKILL; SPHINCTEROTOMY; SURGICAL TRAINING; TEACHING HOSPITAL;

EID: 1242340444     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/S0016-5107(03)00006-3     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Jowell PS, Baillie J, Branch MS, Affronti J, Browning CL, Bute BP. Quantitative assessment of procedural competence. A prospective study of training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Ann Intern Med 1996;125:983-9.
2. Hoffman BJ, Hawes RH. Endoscopic ultrasound and clinical competence. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1995;5:879-84.
3. Training and education in gastroenterology: list of available training programs. Gastroenterology 2000;119:550-80.
4. Cleveland WS, Devlin SJ, Grosse E, Regression by local fitting. Journal of Econometrics 1988;37:87-114.
5. Cleveland WS, Grosse E. Computational methods for local regression. Statistics and Computing 1991;1:47-62.
6. Choudari CP, Sherman S, Fogel EL, Phillips S, Kochell A, Flueckiger J, et al. Success of ERCP at a referral center after a previously unsuccessful attempt. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:478-83.
7. Rollhauser C, Benjamin SB, Al-Kawas FH. Success of ERCP at an academic center after referral for a failed cannulation or failure to complete therapeutic goal [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;45:146.
8. Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, Katon RM. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). A study of 10,000 cases. Gastroenterology 1976;70:314-20.
9. Wigton RS, Vennes JA. Clinical competence in diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatograpby (Health and Public Policy Committee, American College of Physicians). Ann Intern Med 1988;108:142-4.
10. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Guidelines for advanced endoscopic training. ASGE publication No. 1026. Manchester (MA): ASGE 1986.
11. European Union of Medical Specialists, European Board of Gastroenterology. Requirements for the specialty gastroenterology. In: Charter on Training of Medical Specialists in the EU. Brussels, Belgium: European Union of Medical Specialists, European Board of Gastroenterology; 1995. [cited 2001 Feb 26]. Available from: URL:http://www.uems.be/gastro-e.htm
12. Conjoint Committee for Recognition of Training in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Information for supervisors: changes to endoscopic training. Sydney: The Committee;1997.
13. Watkins JL, Etzkorn KP, Wiley TE, DeGuzman L, Harig JM. Assessment of technical competence during ERCP training. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;44:411-5.
14. Allison MC, Ramanaden DN, Fouweather MG, Davis DK, Colin-Jones DG, Provision of ERCP services and training in the United Kingdom. Endoscopy 2000;32:693-9.
15. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy. Gastroint Endosc 2002;56(6Suppl): S153-302.