Comparison of two chamber methods for measuring soil trace-gas fluxes in bioenergy cropping systems

Soil Science Society of America Journal

Volumn 77, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1601-1612

  Duran, Brianna E L ^a   Kucharik, Christopher J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAMBER SYSTEM; CROPPING SYSTEMS; DEPLOYMENT TIME; DETECTION LIMITS; FLUX CALCULATIONS; FLUX MEASUREMENTS; LINEAR APPROACH; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY;

CROPS; GREENHOUSE GASES; SOILS;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; BIOENERGY; CARBON DIOXIDE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FLUX MEASUREMENT; NITROUS OXIDE; TRACE GAS;

UNITED STATES; WISCONSIN;

EID: 84884832070     PISSN: 03615995     EISSN: 14350661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2013.01.0023     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bekku, Y., H. Koizumi, T. Nakadai, and H. Iwaki. 1995. Measurement of soil respiration using closed chamber method: An IRGA technique. Ecol. Res. 10:369-373. doi:10.1007/BF02347863 (Pubitemid 3005801)
2. Conen, F., and K.A. Smith. 2000. An explanation of linear increases in gas concentration under closed chambers used to measure gas exchange between soil and the atmosphere. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 51:111-117. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2389. 2000.00292.x (Pubitemid 30147352)
3. Davidson, E.A., K. Savage, L.V. Verchot, and R. Navarro. 2002. Minimizing artifacts and biases in chamber-based measurements of soil respiration. Agric. For. Meteorol. 113:21-37. doi:10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00100-4 (Pubitemid 35293752)
4. Dobbie, K.E., and K.A. Smith. 2003. Nitrous oxide emission factors for agricultural soils in Great Britain: The impact of soil water-filled pore space and other controlling variables. Global Change Biol. 9:204-218. doi:10.1046/J.1365-2486.2003.00563.X (Pubitemid 36290352)
5. Gao, E, and S.R. Yates. 1998. Simulation of enclosure-based methods for measuring gas emissions from soil to the atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 103(D20):26127-26136.doi:10.1029/98JD01345 (Pubitemid 128702667)
6. Guimbaud, C., V. Catoire, S. Gogo, C. Robert, M. Chartier, and E Laggoun-Défarge, et al. 2011. A portable infrared laser spectrometer for flux measurements of trace gases at the geosphere-atmosphere interface. Meas. Sci. Technol. 22(7):075601. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/22/7/075601
7. Healy, RW, R.G. Striegl, T.E Russell, G.L. Hutchinson, and G.R Livingston. 1996. Numerical evaluation of static-chamber measurements of soil-atmosphere gas exchange: Identification of physical processes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60:740-747. doi:10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000030009x
8. Hutchinson, G.L., and G.R Livingston. 2001. Vents and seals in non-steady-state chambers used for measuring gas exchange between soil and the atmosphere. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 52:675-682 doi:10.1046/j.1365-2389.2001.00415.x (Pubitemid 34029785)
9. Hutchinson, G.L., and A.R. Mosier. 1981. Improved soil cover method for field measurement of nitrous oxide fluxes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45:311-316. doi:10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500020017x
10. 2 gas concentrations and fluxes at the soil surface. Global Change Biol. 19:327-336.doi:10.1111/gcb.12021
11. 2O flux measurements by static chambers. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 82:175-186. doi:10.1007/s10705-008-9179-x
12. 2 flux determination by closed-chamber methods can be seriously biased by inappropriate application of linear regression. Biogeosci-ence 4:1005-1025. doi:10.5194/bg-4-1005-2007 (Pubitemid 350136905)
13. 2 flux chamber: Using the 6400-09 soil chamber. In: Using the LI-6400/LI-6400XT portable photosynthesis system. 6th ed. LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE.p. 28-1-28-49.
14. Livingston, G.R, and G.L. Hutchinson. 1995. Enclosure-based measurement of trace gas exchange: Applications and sources of error. In: RA. Matson and R.C. Harriss, editors, Biogenic trace gases: Measuring emissions from soil and water. Blackwell Science Publ., Cambridge, UK. p. 14-50.
15. Livingston, G.R, G.L. Hutchinson, and K. Spartalian. 2006. Trace gas emission in chambers. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 70:1459-1469. doi:10.2136/ss- saj2005.0322
16. Lloyd, J., and J.A. Taylor. 1994. On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Funct. Ecol. 8:315-323. doi:10.2307/2389824 (Pubitemid 2100544)
17. Martin, J.G., RV. Bolstad, and J.M. Norman. 2004. A carbon dioxide flux generator for testing infrared gas analyzer-based soil respiration systems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68:514-518. doi:10.2136/sssaj2004.0514 (Pubitemid 38308078)
18. Norman, J.M., C.J. Kucharik, S.T. Gower, D.D. Baldocchi, RM. Crill, M. Rayment, et al. 1997. A comparison of six methods for measuring soil-surface carbon dioxide fluxes. J. Geophy. Res. 102(D24):28771-28777. doi:10.1029/97JD01440
19. Parkin, T.B., and R.T. Venterea. 2010. Chamber-based trace gas flux measurements. In: R.F. Follett, editor, Samplingprotocols. USDA-ARS, Washington, DC. p. 3-1-3-39.
20. Parkin, T.B., R.T. Venterea, and S.K. Hargreaves. 2012. Calculating the detection limits of chamber-based soil greenhouse gas flux measurements. J. Environ. Qual. 41:705-715. doi:10.2134/jeq2011.0394
21. Pedersen, A.R., S.O. Petersen, and K. Scheide. 2010. A comprehensive approach to soil-atmosphere trace-gas flux estimation with static chambers. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 61:888-902. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01291.x
22. 2. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 24:243-253. doi:10.1002/rcm.4380
23. 2 efflux. Agric. For. Meteorol. 123:159-176. doi:10.1016/j. agrformet.2003.12.001 (Pubitemid 38658977)
24. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, http://www.R-project.org/
25. 2 efflux. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 51:107-110. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2389.2000. 00283.x (Pubitemid 30147351)
26. Rochette, P., and N Bertrand 2008. Soil-surface gas emissions. In: M. Carter, editor, Soil sampling and methods of analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton FL. p. 851-861.
27. Rochette, P., and N.S. Eriks en-Ham el. 2008. Chamber measurements of soil nitrous oxide flux: Are absolute values reliable? Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 72:331-342. doi:10.2136/sssaj2007.0215 (Pubitemid 351399324)
28. Rochette, P., and G.L. Hutchinson. 2005. Measurement of soil respiration in situ: Chamber techniques. In: J.L. Hatfield and J.M. Baker, editors, Micromete orology in agricultural systems. Agron. Monogr. 47. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI. p. 247-286. doi:10.2134/agronmonogr47.c12
29. Rustad, L.E., T.G. Huntington, and R.D. Boone. 2000. Controls on soil respiration: Implications for climate change. Biogeochemistry 48:1-6. doi:10.1023/A:1006255431298 (Pubitemid 30065095)
30. 2 efflux and forest structure in 50-year-old longleaf pine. For. Sci. 58:472-484.
31. Singh, B.R, B.J. Hatton, B. Singh, A.L. Cowie, and A. Kathuria. 2010. Influence of biochars on nitrous oxide emission and nitrogen leaching from two contrasting soils. J. Environ. Qual. 39:1224-1235. doi:10.2134/jeq2009.0138
32. Sullivan, B.W., S. Dore, T.E. Kolb, S.C. Hart, and M.C. Montes-Helu. 2010. Evaluation of methods for estimating soil carbon dioxide efflux across a gradient of forest disturbance. Global Change Biol. 16:2449-2460. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02139.x
33. Venterea, R.T. 2010. Simplified method for quantifying theoretical underestimation of chamber-based trace gas fluxes. J. Environ. Qual. 39:126-135. doi:10.2134/jeq2009.0231
34. Venterea, R.T., K.A. Spokas, and J.M. Baker. 2009. Accuracy and precision analysis of chamber-based nitrous oxide gas flux estimates. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 73:1087-1093. doi:10.2136/sssaj2008.0307
35. 2 effluxes with chambers. Chem. Geol. 177:3-13. doi:10.1016/S0009-2541(00)00388-0 (Pubitemid 32620945)
36. Widen, B., and A. Lindroth. 2003. A calibration system for soil carbon dioxide-efflux measurement chambers: Description and application. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67:327-334. doi:10.2136/sssaj2003.0327 (Pubitemid 36111240)