Calculating the detection limits of chamber-based soil greenhouse gas flux measurements

Journal of Environmental Quality

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 705-715

  Parkin, T B ^a   Venterea, R T ^a   Hargreaves, S K ^b  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBIENT CONCENTRATIONS; ANALYTICAL VARIABILITY; CHAMBER DESIGN; CONCEPTUAL SIMPLICITY; DATA POINTS; DATA SETS; DEPLOYMENT TIME; DETECTION LIMITS; FLUX MEASUREMENTS; GAS FLUX; GAS SPECIES; H/M METHOD; HEADSPACES; MONTE CARLO SIMULATION; NON-LINEAR MODEL; SOIL GAS; TIME COURSE; TIME POINTS; TRACE GAS CONCENTRATIONS;

GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES; MONTE CARLO METHODS; SOIL SURVEYS;

ANALYTICAL MODELS;

ACCURACY; AMBIENT AIR; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; GAS TRANSPORT; GREENHOUSE GAS; HUTCHINSON MOSIER METHOD; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MONTE CARLO METHOD; QUADRATIC METHOD; REACTION TIME; REVISED HUTCHINSON MOSIER METHOD; SOIL; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; METHODOLOGY; TIME;

CARBON DIOXIDE; METHANE; NITROUS OXIDE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; METHANE; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NITROUS OXIDE; SOIL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84862257306     PISSN: 00472425     EISSN: 15372537     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2011.0394     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. American Public Health Association. 1985. Precision, accuracy and correctness of analyses. In: A.E. Greenberg, R.R. Trussell, and L.S. Clesceri, editors, Standard methods for the analysis of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC. p. 20-36.
2. Anthony, W.H., G.L. Hutchinson, and G.P. Livingston. 1995. Chamber measurement of soil-atmosphere gas exchange: Linear vs. diffusionbased flux models. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 59:1308-1310. doi:10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900050015x
3. 2O. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 32:2795-2807. doi:10.1081/CSS-120000962
4. Box, G.E.P., and M.E. Muller. 1958. A note on the generation of random normal deviates. Ann. Math. Stat. 29:610-611. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177706645
5. Emerson, J.D., and M.A. Stoto. 1983. Transforming data. In: D.C. Hoaglin, F. Mosteller, and J.W. Tukey, editors, Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York. p. 97-120.
6. Gilbert, R.O. 1987. Statistical methods for environmental pollution monitoring. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York.
7. Healy, R.W., R.G. Striegl, T.F. Rusell, G.L. Hutchinson, and G.P. Livingston. 1996. Numerical evaluation of static- chamber measurements of soil-atmosphere gas exchange: Identification of physical processes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60:740-747. doi:10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000030009x
8. Hutchinson, G.L., and G.P. Livingston. 1993. Use of chamber systems to measure trace gas fluxes. In: L. Harper et al., editors, Agricultural ecosystem effects on trace gases and global climate change. ASA Spec. Publ. 55. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI. p. 63-78.
9. Hutchinson, G.L., and A.R. Mosier. 1981. Improved soil cover method for field measurement of nitrous oxide fluxes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45:311-316. doi:10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500020017x
10. Livingston, G.P., and G.L. Hutchinson. 1995. Enclosure-based measurement of trace gas exchange: Applications and sources of error. In: P.A. Matson and R.C. Harriss, editors, Biogenic trace gases: Measuring emissions from soil and water. Methods in Ecology. Blackwell Science/Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK. p. 14-51.
11. Livingston, G.P., G.L. Hutchinson, and K. Spartalian. 2006. Trace gas emission in chambers: A non-steady-state diffusion model. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 70:1459-1469. doi:10.2136/sssaj2005.0322
12. Pedersen, A.R., S.O. Petersen, and F.P. Vinther. 2001. Stochastic diffusion model for estimating trace gas emissions with static chambers. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65:49-58. doi:10.2136/sssaj2001.65149x
13. Pedersen, A.R., S.O. Petersen, and K. Schelde. 2010. A comprehensive approach to soil-atmosphere trace-gas flux estimation with static chambers. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 61:888-902. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01291.x
14. Rochette, P., D.A. Angers, M.H. Chantigny, N. Bertrand, and D. Cote. 2004. Carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide emissions following fall and spring applications of pig slurry to an agricultural soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68:1410-1420. doi:10.2136/sssaj2004.1410
15. Rochette, P., and N. Bertrand. 2007. Soil-surface gas emissions. In: M. Carter and E.G. Gregorich, editors, Soil sampling and methods of analysis. 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. p. 851-861.
16. Rochette, P., and N.S. Eriksen-Hamel. 2008. Chamber measurements of soil nitrous oxide flux: Are absolute values reliable? Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 72:331-342. doi:10.2136/sssaj2007.0215
17. Venterea, R.T. 2010. Simplified method for quantifying theoretical underestimation of chamber-based trace gas fluxes. J. Environ. Qual. 39:126-135. doi:10.2134/jeq2009.0231
18. Venterea, R.T., and J.M. Baker. 2008. Effects of soil physical nonuniformity on chamber-based gas flux estimates. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 72:1410-1417. doi:10.2136/sssaj2008.0019
19. Venterea, R.T., K.A. Spokas, and J.M. Baker. 2009. Accuracy and precision analysis of chamber-based nitrous oxide gas flux estimates. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 73:1087-1093. doi:10.2136/sssaj2008.0307
20. Verchot, L.V., E.A. Davidson, J.H. Cattânio, I.L. Ackerman, H.E. Erickson, and M. Keller. 1999. Land use change and biogeochemical controls of nitrogen oxide emissions from soils in eastern Amozonia. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 13:31-46.
21. Wagner, S.W., D.C. Reicosky, and R.S. Alessi. 1997. Regression models for calculating gas fluxes measured with a closed chamber. Agron. J. 89:279-284. doi:10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900020021x