Comparison of different chamber techniques for measuring soil CO 2 efflux

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Volumn 123, Issue 3-4, 2004, Pages 159-176

  Pumpanen, Jukka ^a   Kolari, Pasi ^a   Ilvesniemi, Hannu ^a   Minkkinen, Kari ^a   Vesala, Timo ^a   Niinistö, Sini ^b   Lohila, Annalea ^c   Larmola, Tuula ^b   Morero, Micaela ^b   Pihlatie, Mari ^a   Janssens, Ivan ^d   Yuste, Jorge Curiel ^d   Grünzweig, José M ^e   Reth, Sascha ^f   Subke, Jens Arne ^g   Savage, Kathleen ^h   Kutsch, Werner ⁱ   Østreng, Geir ^j   Ziegler, Waldemar ^k   Anthoni, Peter ^k   Lindroth, Anders ^l   Hari, Pertti ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^c FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^e WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^f UNIVERSITY OF BAYREUTH   (Germany)

^g SECOND UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES   (Italy)

^h WOODS HOLE RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^j Norsk Institutt for Skogforskning   (Norway)

^k MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOGEOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

^l LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

more..

Author keywords

Chamber; Diffusion; Porosity; Soil CO2 efflux; Turbulence

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; FLUX CHAMBER; FLUX MEASUREMENT; MEASUREMENT METHOD; SOIL EMISSION; SOIL MOISTURE;

EID: 2442477934     PISSN: 01681923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alm J., Talanov A., Saarnio S., Silvola J., Ikkonen E., Aaltonen H., Nykänen H., Martikainen P.J. Reconstruction of the carbon balance for microsites in a boreal oligotrophic pine fen, Finland. Oecologia. 110:1997;423-431
2. Davidson E.A., Savage K., Verchot L.V., Navarro R. Minimizing artifacts and biases in chamber-based measurements of soil respiration. Agric. For. Meteorol. 113(1-4):2002;21-37
3. De Jong E., Redmann R.E., Ripley E.A. A comparison of methods to measure soil respiration. Soil Sci. 127:1979;300-306
4. 2 efflux from the surface soil. Funct. Ecol. 10(2):1996;297-305
5. 2 efflux measurement. Funct. Ecol. 12(2):1998;319-325
6. Gao F., Yates S.R. Laboratory study of closed and dynamic flux chambers: experimental results and implications for field application. J. Geophys. Res. 103(D20):1998;26115-26125
7. 2 exchange at the moss surface of a black spruce forest. Tree Physiol. 17:1997;537-542
8. Grünzweig J.M., Lin T., Rotenberg E., Yakir D. Carbon sequestration in arid-land forest. Global Change Biol. 9:2003;791-799
9. 2 efflux from an upland oak forest. Tree Physiol. 13:1993;1-15
10. 2 flux. Plant Cell Environ. 22:1999;1297-1301
11. Healy R.W., Striegl R.G., Russell T.F., Hutchinson G.L., Livingston G.P. Numerical evaluation of static-chamber measurements of soil-atmosphere gas exchange: identification of physical processes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60:1996;740-747
12. Irvine J., Law B.E. Contrasting soil respiration in young and old-growth ponderosa pine forests. Global Change Biol. 8:2002;1183-1194
13. 2 efflux: an in situ comparison of four techniques. Tree Physiol. 20:2000;23-32
14. 2 flux as an index of soil respiration in situ: a comparison of two chamber methods. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28(10-11):1996;1297-1306
15. 2 efflux from soil surface. Soil Sci. 118:1974;233-237
16. Kutsch, W.L., 1996. Untersuchung zur Bodenatmung zweier Ackerstandorte im Bereich der Bornhöveder Seenkette. In: EcoSys. Beiträge zur Ökosystemforschung, Suppl. Bd. 16. Ökologie-Zentrum der Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel, Germany, 125 pp.
17. Kutsch W.L., Staack A., Wötzel J., Middelhoff U., Kappen L. Field measurements of root respiration and total soil respiration in an alder forest. New Phytologist. 150:2001;157-168
18. Livingston, G.P., Hutchinson, G.L., 1995. Enclosure-based measurement of trace gas exchange: applications and sources of error. In: Matson, P.A., Harriss, R.C. (Eds.), Biogenic Trace Gases: Measuring Emissions from Soil and Water. Blackwell Science, Cambridge, pp. 14-50.
19. 2. Global Change Biol. 5:1999;269-281
20. 2 efflux demonstrated with a laboratory apparatus. Ecology. 75(8):1994;2460-2463
21. Norman J.M., Kucharik C.J., Gower S.T., Baldocchi D.D., Crill P.M., Rayment M., Savage K., Striegl R.G. A comparison of six methods for measuring soil-surface carbon dioxide fluxes. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 102:1997;28771-28777
22. 2 efflux: analysis of error sources related to the chamber system. J. Geophys. Res. 106(D8):2001;7985-7992
23. 2 concentration in a Scots pine forest: comparison of two chamber techniques. Global Change Biol. 9:2003;371-382
24. Raich J.W., Bowden R.D., Teudler P.A. Comparison of two static chamber techniques for determining carbon dioxide efflux from forest soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54:1990;1754-1757
25. 2 effluxes in the field. J. Geophys. Res. 102(D24):1997;28779- 28784
26. 2 efflux. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 51:2000;107-110
27. Rochette P., Gregorich E.G., Desjardins R.L. Comparison of static and dynamic closed chambers for measurement of soil respiration under field conditions. Can. J. Soil Sci. 72:1992;605-609
28. 2 flux measurements: trade-offs between spatial and temporal resolution. J. Exp. Bot. 54(384):2003;1-9
29. Singh J.S., Gupta S.R. Plant decomposition and soil respiration in terrestrial ecosystems. Bot. Rev. 43(4):1977;449-528
30. 2 fluxes in temperate forest ecosystems. An investigation of spatial and temporal patterns and abiotic controls. In: Bayreuther Forum Ökologie, vol. 96. BITÖK, Bayreuth, Germany.
31. Valentini R., Matteucci G., Dolman A.J., Schulze E.-D., Rebmann C., Moors E.J., Granier A., Gross P., Jensen N.O., Pilegaard K., Lindroth A., Grelle A., Bernhofer C., Grünwald T., Aubinet M., Ceulemans R., Kowalski A.S., Vesala T., Rannik Ü., Berbiger P., Loustau D., Gudmundsson J., Thorgeirsson H., Ibrom A., Morgenstern K., Clement R., Moncrieff J., Montagnani L., Minerbi S., Jarvis P.G. Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests. Nature. 404:2000;861-865
32. Velthof G.L., Oenema O. Nitrous oxide fluxes from grassland in the Netherlands: statistical analysis of flux chamber measurements. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 46:1995;533-540
33. Velthof G.L., Van Groenigen J.W., Gebauer G., Pietrzak S., Jarvis S.C., Pinto M., Corre W., Oenema O. Temporal stability of spatial patterns of nitrous oxide fluxes from sloping grassland. J. Environ. Qual. 29(5):2000;1397-1407
34. Widén B., Lindroth A. A calibration system for soil carbon dioxide-efflux measurement chambers: description and application. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67:2003;327-334