A comparison of six methods for measuring soil-surface carbon dioxide fluxes

Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Volumn 102, Issue 24, 1997, Pages 28771-28777

  Norman, J M ^a   Kucharik, C J ^a   Gower, S T ^a   Baldocchi, D D ^b,g   Crill, P M ^c   Rayment, M ^d   Savage, K ^e   Striegl, R G ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^e MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^f DENVER FEDERAL CENTER   (United States)

^g NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Silver Spring   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PICEA MARIANA; PINUS BANKSIANA; POPULUS TREMULOIDES;

BOREAL FOREST; CARBON BUDGET; CARBON DIXOIDE FLUX; FOREST BIOME; MEASUREMENT METHOD; SOIL SURFACE;

EID: 0031448530     PISSN: 01480227     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/97jd01440     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. 2 flux, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 7271-7285, 1991.
2. 2 flux densities above and below a temperate broadleaf and boreal pine forest, Tree Physiol., 16, 5-16, 1996.
3. Baldocchi, D. D., C. A. Vogel, and B. Hall, Seasonal variation of carbon dioxide exchange rates above and below a boreal jack pine forest, Agric. For. Meteorol., 83, 147-170, 1997.
4. Crill, P. M., Seasonal pattern cycles of methane uptake and carbon dioxide release by a temperate woodland soil. Global Biogeochem., 5, 319-334, 1991.
5. Field, C. B., J. T. Ball, and J. A. Berry, Photosynthesis: Principles and field techniques, in Plant Physiological Ecology: Field Methods and Instrumentation, edited by R. W. Pearcy, J. Ehleringer, H. A. Mooney, and P. W. Rundel, pp. 209-253, Chapman and Hall, New York, 1989.
6. Haynes, B. E., and S. T. Gower, Below-ground carbon allocation in unfertilized and fertilized red pine plantations in northern Wisconsin, Tree Physiol., 15, 317-325, 1995.
7. Healy, R. W., R. G. Striegl, T. F. Russell, G. L. Hutchinson, and G. P. Livingston, Numerical evaluation of static-chamber measurements of soil-atmosphere gas exchange: Identification of physical processes, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 60, 740-747, 1996.
8. 2 flux from soil surface, Soil Sci., 118, 233-237, 1974.
9. Kimbal, B. A., and E. R. Lemon, Air turbulence effects upon soil-gas exchange, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 35, 16-21, 1971.
10. Nakayama, F. S., Soil respiration, Remote Sens. Rev., 5, 311-321, 1990.
11. 2 efflux demonstrated with a laboratory apparatus, Ecology, 75, 2460-2463, 1994.
12. 2 fluxes and the carbon budget of a grassland, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 18,845-18,853, 1992.
13. Raich, J. W., and W. A. Schlesinger, The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate, Tellus, 446, 81-99, 1992.
14. 2 effluxes in the field, J. Geophys. Res., this issue.
15. Rochette, P., E. G. Gregorich, and R. L. Desjardins, Comparison of static and dynamic closed chambers for measurement of soil respiration under field conditions, Can. J. Soil Sci., 72, 605-609, 1992.
16. Striegl, R. G., T. A. McConnaughey, D. C. Thorstenson, E. P. Weeks, and J. C. Woodward, Consumption of atmospheric methane by desert soils, Nature, 357, 145-147, 1992.
17. Verma, S. B., Micrometeorological methods for measuring surface fluxes of mass and energy, Remote Sens. Rev., 5, 99-115, 1990.