A developmental ontology for the mammalian brain based on the prosomeric model

Trends in Neurosciences

Volumn 36, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 570-578

  Puelles, Luis ^a   Harrison, Megan ^b   Paxinos, George ^c,d   Watson, Charles ^c,d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

^b FREMANTLE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^e CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Forebrain; Gene expression; Hindbrain; Midbrain; Neuromeres; Ontology

Indexed keywords

GAMMA GLUTAMYLCYSTEINE SYNTHETASE 1; GLUTAMATE CYSTEINE LIGASE; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN; LIM HOMEOBOX TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 1 BETA; NETRIN 1; NK2 HOMEOBOX 1 PROTEIN; NK2 HOMEOBOX 6 PROTEIN; SONIC HEDGEHOG PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMNIOTE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; CORPUS STRIATUM; CUNEATE NUCLEUS; DEVELOPMENTAL GENE; DEVELOPMENTAL ONTOLOGY; DIENCEPHALON; FOREBRAIN; GENE EXPRESSION; GLOBUS PALLIDUS; HYPOTHALAMUS; LATERAL RETICULAR NUCLEUS; MAGNOCELLULAR NUCLEUS; MAMMAL; MESENCEPHALON; NEURAL TUBE; NEUROMERE; NONHUMAN; POSTERIOR HYPOTHALAMUS; PREOPTIC AREA; PRETECTUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RHOMBENCEPHALON; SUBPALLIUM; SUBSTANTIA INNOMINATA; SUBSTANTIA NIGRA; SUBTHALAMUS; TAXONOMIC IDENTIFICATION; TEGMENTUM; TELENCEPHALON; VENTRAL TEGMENTUM;

FOREBRAIN; GENE EXPRESSION; HINDBRAIN; MIDBRAIN; NEUROMERES; ONTOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL ONTOLOGIES; BRAIN; CLASSIFICATION; HUMANS; MORPHOGENESIS;

EID: 84884815226     PISSN: 01662236     EISSN: 1878108X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2013.06.004     Document Type: Review

References (103)

1. Gruber T.R. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquisit. 1993, 5:199-220.
2. Bowden D.M. NeuroNames brain hierarchy. Neuroimage 1995, 2:63-83.
3. Bowden D.M., et al. Creating neuroscience ontologies. Methods Mol. Biol. 2007, 401:67-87.
4. Bowden D.M. NeuroNames: an ontology for the Braininfo portal to neuroscience on the web. Neuroinformatics 2012, 10:97-114.
5. Bug W.J., et al. The NIFSTD and BIRNLex vocabularies: building comprehensive ontologies for neuroscience. Neuroinformatics 2008, 6:175-194.
6. Bota M., et al. Brain architecture management system. Neuroinformatics 2005, 3:15-48.
7. Bota M., Swanson L.W. BAMS neuroanatomical ontology: design and implementation. Front. Neuroinform. 2008, 2:2.
8. Capecchi M.R. The new mouse genetics: altering the genome by gene targeting. Trends Genet. 1989, 5:70-76.
9. Puelles L. Brain segmentation and forebrain development in amniotes. Brain Res. Bull. 2001, 55:695-710.
10. Zervas M., et al. Cell behaviors and genetic lineages of the mesencephalon and rhombomere 1. Neuron 2004, 43:345-357.
11. Puelles E., et al. Midbrain. The Mouse Nervous System 2012, 337-359. Elsevier Academic Press. C. Watson (Ed.).
12. Alonso A., et al. Development of the serotonergic cells in murine raphe nuclei and their relations with rhombomeric domains. Brain Struct. Funct. 2012, 10.1007/s00429-012-0456-8.
13. von Kupffer C. Die Morphogenie des Centralnervensystems. Handbuch der vergleichenden Entwicklungslehre der Wirbeltiere 1906, 1-272. Gustav Fischer, (Bd 2 Teil 3). O. Hertwig (Ed.).
14. Conte I., et al. Comparative analysis of Six3 and Six6 distribution in the developing and adult mouse brain. Dev. Dyn. 2005, 234:718-725.
15. Shimogori T., et al. A genomic atlas of mouse hypothalamic development. Nat. Neurosci. 2010, 13:767-775.
16. Puelles L., et al. Hypothalamus. The Mouse Nervous System 2012, 221-313. Elsevier Academic Press. C. Watson (Ed.).
17. Lagutin O.V., et al. Six3 repression of Wnt signaling in the anterior neuroectoderm is essential for vertebrate forebrain development. Genes Dev. 2003, 17:368-379.
18. Studer M. Initiation of facial motoneurone migration is dependent on rhombomeres 5 and 6. Development 2001, 128:3707-3716.
19. Swanson L.W. Brain Architecture 2010, Oxford University Press.
20. Kimura J., et al. Emx2 and Pax6 function in cooperation with Otx2 and Otx1 to develop caudal forebrain primordium that includes future archipallium. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25:5097-5108.
21. Flames N., et al. Delineation of multiple subpallial progenitor domains by the combinatorial expression of transcriptional codes. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:9682-9695.
22. Hirata T., et al. Identification of distinct telencephalic progenitor pools for neuronal diversity in the amygdala. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12:141-149.
23. Gelman D.M., et al. The embryonic preoptic area is a novel source of cortical GABAergic interneurons. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:9380-9389.
24. Flandin P., et al. The progenitor zone of the ventral medial ganglionic eminence requires Nkx2-1 to generate most of the globus pallidus but few neocortical interneurons. J Neurosci 2010, 30:2812-2823.
25. Watson C. The presumptive isthmic region in a mouse as defined by fgf8 expression. Brain Behav. Evol. 2010, 75:315.
26. Marin F., et al. Hox gene colinear expression in the avian medulla oblongata is correlated with pseudorhombomeric domains. Dev. Biol. 2008, 323:230-247.
27. Otero R.A., et al. Chick/quail chimeras with partial cerebellar grafts: an analysis of the origin and migration of cerebellar cells. J. Comp. Neurol. 2004, 333:597-615.
28. Alvarado-Mallart R-M. Fate and potentialities of the avian mesencephalic/metencephalic neuroepithelium. J. Neurobiol. 1993, 24:1341-1355.
29. Hallonet M., Alvarado-Mallet R-M. The chick/quail chimeric system: a model for early cerebellar development. Perspectives on Developmental Neurobiology 1997, 17-31. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers. M. Bronner-Fraser (Ed.).
30. Bardet S.M., et al. Ontogenetic expression of sonic hedgehog in the chicken subpallium. Front. Neuroanat. 2010, 4:1-16.
31. Puelles L., Rubenstein J.L. Forebrain gene expression domains and the evolving prosomeric model. Trends Neurosci. 2003, 26:469-476.
32. Lim Y., Golden J.A. Patterning the developing diencephalon. Brain Res. Rev. 2007, 53:17-26.
33. Puelles L. Thoughts on the development, structure and evolution of the mammalian and avian telencephalic pallium. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2001, 356:1583-1598.
34. Puelles L., Medina L. Development of neurons expressing tyrosine hydroxylase and dopamine in the chicken brain: a comparative segmental analysis. Phylogeny and Development of Catecholamine Systems in the CNS of Vertebrates 1994, 381-404. Cambridge University Press. W.J.A.J. Smeets, A. Reiner (Eds.).
35. Verney C., et al. Structure of longitudinal brain zones that provide the origin for the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area in human embryos, as revealed by cytoarchitecture and tyrosine hydroxylase, calretinin, calbindin, and GABA immunoreactions. J. Comp. Neurol. 2001, 429:22-44.
36. Smits S., et al. Developmental origin and fate of meso-diencephalic dopamine neurons. Prog. Neurobiol. 2006, 78:1-16.
37. His W. Vorschläge zur Einteilung des Gehirns. Arch. Anat. Entwickelungsgesch. 1893, 3:172-179.
38. Puelles L., et al. Gene maps and related histogenetic domains in the forebrain and midbrain. The Rat Nervous System 2004, 3-24. Elsevier Academic Press. 3rd edn. G. Paxinos (Ed.).
39. Manuel M., Price D.J. Role of Pax6 in forebrain regionalization. Brain Res. Bull. 2005, 66:387-393.
40. Matsunaga E., et al. Role of Pax3/7 in the tectum regionalization. Development 2001, 128:4069-4077.
41. Aruga J., et al. A novel zinc finger protein, Zic, is involved in neurogenesis, especially in the cell lineage of cerebellar granule cells. J. Neurochem. 1994, 63:1880-1890.
42. Herrick C.J. The morphology of the forebrain in Amphibia and Reptilia. J. Comp. Neurol. 1910, 20:413-547.
43. His W. Über das frontale Ende des Gehirnrohrs. Arch. Anat. Entwickelungsgesch. 1893, 3:157-171.
44. His W. Zur allgemeinen Morphologie des Gehirns. Arch. Anat. Entwickelungsgesch. 1892, 2:346-383.
45. His W. Die Anatomische Nomenclatur. Nomina Anatomica. Arch. Anat. Entwickelungsgesch. 1895, 1895(Suppl.):1-180.
46. His W. Die Entwicklung des menschlichen Gehirns während der ersten Monate 1904, Hirzel.
47. Martinez S., et al. Molecular regionalization of the developing neural tube. The Mouse Nervous System 2012, 2-18. Elsevier Academic Press. C. Watson (Ed.).
48. Kuhlenbeck H. Overall morphological pattern. The Central Nervous System of Vertebrates 1973, Vol. 3, part II:1-777. Karger.
49. Skidmore J.M., et al. A novel TaulacZ allele reveals a requirement for Pitx2 in formation of the mammillothalamic tract. Genesis 2012, 50:67-73.
50. von Baer K.E. Entwicklungsgeschichte der Thiere: Beobachtung und Relfexion 1828, Borntrager.
51. Orr H.J. Contribution to the embryology of the lizard. J. Morphol. 1887, 1:311-372.
52. Chatonnet F., et al. Ontogeny of central rhythm generation in chicks and rodents. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2006, 154:37-46.
53. Diaz C., Glover J.C. Comparative aspects of the hodological organization of the vestibular nuclear complex and related neuron populations. Brain Res. Bull. 2002, 57:307-312.
54. Schwarz M., et al. Pax2/5 and Pax6 subdivide the early neural tube into three domains. Mech. Dev. 1999, 82:29-39.
55. Millet S., et al. The caudal limit of Otx2 gene expression as a marker for the midbrain/hindbrain boundary: a study using in situ hybridization and chick/quail homotopic grafts. Development 1996, 122:3785-3797.
56. Millet S., et al. A role for Gbx2 in repression of Otx2 and positioning the mid/hindbrain organizer. Nature 1999, 401:161-164.
57. Palmgren A. Embryological and morphological studies on the mid-brain and cerebellum of vertebrates. Acta Zool. 1921, 2:1-94.
58. Hidalgo-Sánchez M., et al. Distinct pre-isthmic domain, defined by overlap of Otx2 and Pax2 expression domains in the chicken caudal midbrain. J. Comp. Neurol. 2005, 483:17-29.
59. Puelles L., et al. The Chick Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. An Atlas Featuring Neuromeric Subdivisions and Mammalian Homologies 2007, Elsevier Academic Press.
60. Cambronero F., Puelles L. Rostrocaudal nuclear relationships in the avian medulla oblongata: fate-map with quail-chick chimeras. J. Comp. Neurol. 2000, 427:522-545.
61. Puelles L. Plan of the developing vertebrate nervous system (prosomere model, overview of brain organization). Comprehensive Developmental Neuroscience 2013, 187-210. Elsevier Academic Press. P. Rakic, J.L.R. Rubenstein (Eds.).
62. Joyner A., et al. Otx2, Gbx2 and Fgf8 interact to position and maintain a mid-hindbrain organizer. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2000, 12:736-741.
63. Martínez S. The isthmic organizer and brain regionalization. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2001, 45:367-371.
64. Aroca P., Puelles L. Postulated boundaries and differential fate in the developing rostral hindbrain. Brain Res. Rev. 2005, 49:179-190.
65. Martinez S., Alvarado-Mallart R.M. Rostral cerebellum originates from the caudal portion of the so-called 'mesencephalic' vesicle: a study using chick/quail chimeras. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1989, 1:549-560.
66. Wingate R.J.T., Lumsden A. Persistence of rhombomeric organisation in the postsegmental hindbrain. Development 1996, 122:2143-2152.
67. Lumsden A., Krumlauf R. Patterning the vertebrate neuraxis. Science 1996, 274:1109-1115.
68. Xu Q., et al. Roles of Eph receptors and ephrins in segmental patterning. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol Sci. 2000, 355:993-1002.
69. Capecchi M. The role of hox genes in hindbrain development. Molecular and Cellular Approaches to Neural Development 1997, 334-355. Oxford University Press. W.M. Cowan (Ed.).
70. O'Leary D.M., Wilkinson D.G. Eph receptors and ephrins in neural development. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1999, 9:65-73.
71. Marín F., Puelles L. Morphological fate of rhombomeres in quail/chick chimeras: a segmental analysis of hindbrain nuclei. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1995, 7:1714-1738.
72. Farago A.F., et al. Assembly of the brainstem cochlear nuclear complex is revealed by intersectional and subtractive genetic fate maps. Neuron 2006, 50:205-218.
73. Nieuwenhuys R. The structural organization of the forebrain: a commentary on the papers presented at the 20th Annual Karger Workshop 'Forebrain evolution in fishes'. Brain Behav. Evol. 2009, 74:77-85.
74. Nieuwenhuys R. The structural, functional, and molecular organization of the brainstem. Front. Neuroanat. 2011, 5:33.
75. Wilkinson D.G., et al. Segment-specific expression of a zinc-finger gene in the developing nervous system of the mouse. Nature 1989, 337:461-464.
76. Krumlauf R. Hox genes in vertebrate development. Cell 1994, 78:191-201.
77. Jensen P., et al. Redefining the serotonergic system by genetic lineage. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11:417-419.
78. Bulfone A., et al. Barhl1, a gene belonging to a new subfamily of mammalian homeobox genes, is expressed in migrating neurons of the CNS. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2000, 9:1443-1452.
79. Geisen M.J., et al. Hox paralog group 2 genes control the migration of mouse pontine neurons through Slit-Robo signaling. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6:e142.
80. Zhu Y., et al. SDF1/CXCR4 signalling regulates two distinct processes of precerebellar neuronal migration and its depletion leads to abnormal pontine nuclei formation. Development 2009, 136:1919-1928.
81. Altman J., Bayer S.A. Development of the Cerebellar System: In Relation to Its Evolution, Structure, and Functions 1996, CRC Press.
82. Bloch-Gallego E., et al. Development of precerebellar nuclei: instructive factors and intracellular mediators in neuronal migration, survival and axon pathfinding. Brain Res. Rev. 2005, 49:253-266.
83. Ray R.S., Dymecki S.M. Rautenlippe Redux: toward a unified view of the precerebellar rhombic lip. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2009, 21:741-747.
84. Vivancos V., et al. Wnt activity guides facial branchiomotor neuron migration, and involves the PCP pathway and JNK and ROCK kinases. Neural Dev. 2009, 11:4-7.
85. Lorente-Cánovas B., et al. Pax7 and Nkx6.1 identify differentially originated neuronal populations that migrate into the interpeduncular nucleus. Dev. Biol. 2012, 361:12-26.
86. Moreno-Bravo J.A., et al. Role of Shh in the development of molecularly-characterized tegmental nuclei in mouse rhombomere 1. Brain Struct. Funct. 2013, 10.1007/s00429-013-0534-6.
87. Zervas M., et al. Classical embryological studies and modern genetic analysis of midbrain and cerebellum development. Neural Dev. 2005, 69:101-138.
88. Inoue T., et al. Fate mapping of the mouse prosencephalic neural plate. Dev. Biol. 2000, 219:373-383.
89. Cobos I., et al. Fate map of the avian anterior forebrain at the four-somite stage, based on the analysis of quail-chick chimeras. Dev. Biol. 2001, 239:46-67.
90. Sanchez-Arrones L., et al. Incipient forebrain boundaries traced by differential gene expression and fate mapping in the chick neural plate. Dev. Biol. 2009, 335:43-65.
91. Sanchez-Arrones L., et al. Sharpening of the anterior neural border in the chick by rostral endoderm signaling. Development 2012, 139:1034-1044.
92. Shimamura K., et al. Longitudinal organization of the anterior neural plate and neural tube. Development 1995, 121:3923-3933.
93. Shimamura K., Rubenstein J.L. Inductive interactions direct early regionalization of the mouse forebrain. Development 1997, 124:2709-2718.
94. Rubenstein J.L., et al. Regionalization of the prosencephalic neural plate. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1998, 21:445-477.
95. Anderson S.A., et al. Interneuron migration from basal forebrain to neocortex: dependence on Dlx genes. Science 1997, 278:474-476.
96. Swanson L., Petrovich G.D. What is the amygdala?. Trends Neurosci. 1998, 21:323-331.
97. Puelles L., et al. Pallial and subpallial derivatives in the embryonic chick and mouse telencephalon, traced by the expression of the genes Dlx-2, Emx-1, Nkx-2. 1, Pax-6, and Tbr-1. J. Comp. Neurol. 2000, 424:409-438.
98. Medina L., et al. Expression of Dbx1, Neurogenin 2, Semaphorin 5A, Cadherin 8, and Emx1 distinguish ventral and lateral pallial histogenetic divisions in the developing claustroamygdaloid complex. J. Comp. Neurol. 2004, 474:504-523.
99. Puelles L. Pallio-pallial tangential migrations and growth signaling: new scenario for cortical evolution?. Brain Behav. Evol. 2011, 78:108-127.
100. Northcutt R.G., Kaas J.H. The emergence and evolution of mammalian neocortex. Trends Neurosci. 1995, 18:373-379.
101. Witter M.P., Amaral D.G. Hippocampal formation. The Rat Nervous System 2004, 635-704. Elsevier Academic Press. 3rd edn. G. Paxinos (Ed.).
102. Palomero-Gallagher N., Zilles K. Isocortex. The Rat Nervous System 2004, 728-760. Elsevier Academic Press. 3rd edn. G. Paxinos (Ed.).
103. Heimer L., et al. Anatomy of Neuropsychiatry: The New Anatomy of the Basal Forebrain and Its Implications for Neuropsychiatric Illness 2007, Elsevier Academic Press.