Testing The Influence Of Family Structure And Outbreeding Depression On Heterozygosity-Fitness Correlations In Small Populations

Evolution

Volumn 66, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 3624-3631

  Jourdan Pineau, Helene ^a   Folly, Joy ^a   Crochet, Pierre Andre ^a   David, Patrice ^a  

^a CENTRE D ECOLOGIE FONCTIONNELLE ET EVOLUTIVE   (France)

Author keywords

Allele fitness correlation; Amphibian; Family structure; Heterozygosity fitness correlation; Inbreeding depression; Outbreeding depression

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ALLELE; CORRELATION; DATA SET; FITNESS; FRAGMENTATION; FROG; HETEROZYGOSITY; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; NUMERICAL MODEL; POPULATION STRUCTURE;

ANIMAL; ANURA; ARTICLE; FRANCE; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HETEROZYGOTE; INBREEDING; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS;

ANIMALS; ANURA; FRANCE; GENETIC FITNESS; GENOTYPE; HETEROZYGOTE; INBREEDING; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

AMPHIBIA; PELODYTES PUNCTATUS;

EID: 84868131793     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01705.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Altwegg, R., and H. U. Reyer. 2003. Patterns of natural selection on size at metamorphosis in water frogs. Evolution 57:872-882.
2. Andersen, L. W., K. Fog, and C. Damgaard. 2004. Habitat fragmentation causes bottlenecks and inbreeding in the European tree frog (Hyla arborea). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271:1293-1302.
3. Belkhir, K., P. Borsa, L. Chikhi, N. Raufaste, and F. Bonhomme. 1996. GENETIX 4.02 logiciel sous WindowsTM pour la génétique des populations. Available at http://kimura.univ-montp2.fr/genetix/intro.htm.
4. Berven, K. A. 1982. The genetic basis of altitudinal variation in the wood frog Rana sylvatica II. An experimental analysis of larval development. Oecologia 52:360-369.
5. Blomqvist, D., A. Pauliny, M. Larsson, and L. A. Flodin. 2010. Trapped in the extinction vortex? Strong genetic effects in a declining vertebrate population. BMC Evol. Biol. 10:33.
6. Borrell, Y. J., H. Pineda, I. McCarthy, E. Vazquez, J.A. Sanchez, and G. B. Lizana. 2004. Correlations between fitness and heterozygosity at allozyme and microsatellite loci in the Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. Heredity 92:585-593.
7. Britten, H. B. 1996. Meta-analyses of the association between multilocus heterozygosity and fitness. Evolution 50:2158-2164.
8. Chapman, J. R., S. Nakagawa, D. W. Coltman, J. Slate, and B. C. Sheldon. 2009. A quantitative review of heterozygosity-fitness correlations in animal populations. Mol. Ecol. 18:2746-2765.
9. Charpentier, M. J. E., F. Prugnolle, O. Gimenez, and A. Widdig. 2008. Genetic heterozygosity and sociality in a primate species. Behav. Genet. 38:151-158.
10. David, P. 1997. Modeling the genetic basis of heterosis: tests of alternative hypotheses. Evolution 51:1049-1057.
11. David, P. 1998. Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: new perspectives on old problems. Heredity 80:531-537.
12. David, P., and P. Jarne. 1997. Context-dependent survival differences among electrophoretic genotypes in natural populations of the marine bivalve Spisula ovalis. Genetics 146:335-344.
13. David, P., B. Pujol, F. Viard, V. Castella, and J. Goudet. 2007. Reliable selfing rate estimates from imperfect population genetic data. Mol. Ecol. 16:2474-2487.
14. Dixo, M., J. P. Metzger, J. S. Morgante, and K. R. Zamudio. 2009. Habitat fragmentation reduces genetic diversity and connectivity among toad populations in the Brazilian Atlantic Coastal Forest. Biol. Conserv. 142:1560-1569.
15. Dolgin, E. S., B. Charlesworth, S. E. Baird, and A. D. Cutter. 2007. Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in Caenorhabditis nematodes. Evolution 61:1339-1352.
16. Dudash, M. R., and C. B. Fenster. 2000. Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in fragmented populations. Pp. 35-54 in A. G. Young and G. M. Clarke, eds. Genetics, demography and viability of fragmented populations. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
17. Edmands, S. 1999. Heterosis and outbreeding depression in interpopulation crosses spanning a wide range of divergence. Evolution 53:1757-1768.
18. Escobar, J. S., A. Nicot, and P. David. 2008. The different sources of variation in inbreeding depression, heterosis and outbreeding depression in a metapopulation of Physa acuta. Genetics 180:1593-1608.
19. Fahrmeir, L., and G. Tutz. 2001. Multivariate statistical modelling based on generalized linear models. Springer, New-York.
20. Fenster, C. B., and L. F. Galloway. 2000. Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in natural populations of Chamaecrista fasciculata (Fabaceae). Conserv. Biol. 14:1406-1412.
21. Frankham, R. 1998. Inbreeding and extinctions: island populations. Conserv. Biol. 12:665-675.
22. Freidenburg, L. K., and D. K. Skelly. 2004. Microgeographical variation in thermal preference by an amphibian. Ecol. Lett. 7:369-373.
23. Goodnight, K. F., and D. C. Queller. 1999. Computer software for performing likelihood tests of pedigree relationship using genetic markers. Mol. Ecol. 8:1231-1234.
24. Halverson, M. A., D. K. Skelly, and A. Caccone. 2006. Inbreeding linked to amphibian survival in the wild but not in the laboratory. J. Hered. 97:499-507.
25. Hansson, B., H. Westerdahl, D. Hasselquist, M. Akesson, and S. Bensch. 2004. Does linkage disequilibrium generate heterozygosity-fitness correlations in Great Reed Warblers? Evolution 58:870-879.
26. Jaquiery, J., F. Guillaume, and N. Perrin. 2009. Predicting the deleterious effects of mutation load in fragmented populations. Conserv. Biol. 23:207-218.
27. Jourdan-Pineau, H., A. Nicot, V. Dupuy, P. David, and P. A. Crochet. 2009. Development of eight microsatellite markers in the parsley frog (Pelodytes punctatus). Mol. Ecol. Resour. 9:261-263.
28. Jourdan-Pineau, H., P. David, and P. A. Crochet. 2012. Phenotypic plasticity allows the Mediterranean parsley frog Pelodytes punctatus to exploit two contrasted temporal niches under continuous gene flow. Mol. Ecol. 21:876-886.
29. Konovalov, D. A., N. Bajema, and B. Litow. 2005. Modified SIMPSON O(n(3)) algorithm for the full sibship reconstruction problem. Bioinformatics 21:3912-3917.
30. Laugen, A. T., A. Laurila, K. Rasanen, and J. Merila. 2003. Latitudinal countergradient variation in the common frog (Rana temporaria) development rates-evidence for local adaptation. J. Evol. Biol. 16:996-1005.
31. Lesbarreres, D., A. Pagano, and T. Lode. 2003. Inbreeding and road effect zone in a Ranidae: the case of Agile frog, Rana dalmatina Bonaparte, 1840. C. R. Biol. 326:S68-S72.
32. Lesbarreres, D., D. S. Schmeller, C. R. Primmer, and J. Merila. 2007. Genetic variability predicts common frog (Rana temporaria) size at metamorphosis in the wild. Heredity 99:41-46.
33. Lieutenant-Gosselin, M., and L. Bernatchez. 2006. Local heterozygosity-fitness correlations with global positive effects on fitness in threespine stickleback. Evolution 60:1658-1668.
34. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
35. Manly, B. F. J. 1985. The statistics of natural selection on animal populations. Chapman and Hall, London.
36. Oigarden, T., T. Borge, and J. T. Lifjeld. 2010. Extrapair paternity and genetic diversity: the white-throated dipper Cinclus cinclus. J. Avian Biol. 41:248-257.
37. Olano-Marin J., J. C. Mueller, and B. Kempenaers. 2011a. Heterozygosity and survival in blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus): contrasting effects of presumably functional and neutral loci. Mol. Ecol. 20:4028-4041.
38. Olano-Marin J., J. C. Mueller, and B. Kempenaers. 2011b. Correlations between heterozygosity and reproductive success in the blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus): an analysis of inbreeding and single locus effects. Evolution 65:3175-3194.
39. Queller, D. C., and K. F. Goodnight. 1989. Estimating relatedness using genetic-markers. Evolution 43:258-275.
40. Rasanen, K., A. Laurila, and J. Merila. 2003. Geographic variation in acid stress tolerance of the moor frog, Rana arvalis. I. Local adaptation. Evolution 57:352-362.
41. Raymond, M., and F. Rousset. 1995. Genepop (version-1.2)-population-genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86:248-249.
42. Richter-Boix, A., G. A. Llorente, and A. Montori. 2007. A comparative study of predator-induced phenotype in tadpoles across a pond permanency gradient. Hydrobiologia 583:43-56.
43. Richter-Boix, A., C. Teplitsky, B. Rogell, and A. Laurila. 2010. Local selection modifies phenotypic divergence among Rana temporaria populations in the presence of gene flow. Mol. Ecol. 19:716-731.
44. Rousset, F. 2008. GENEPOP ' 007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 8:103-106.
45. Sagvik, J., T. Uller, and M. Olsson. 2005. Outbreeding depression in the common frog, Rana temporaria. Conserv. Genet. 6:205-211.
46. Samollow, P. B. 1980. Selective mortality and reproduction in a natural population of Bufo boreas. Evolution 34:18-39.
47. Schmeller, D. S., J. Schregel, and M. Veith. 2007. The importance of heterozygosity in a frog's life. Naturwissenschaften 94:360-366.
48. Smith, D. C. 1987. Adult recruitment in chorus frogs-effects of size and date at metamorphosis. Ecology 68:344-350.
49. Szulkin, M., and P. David. 2011. Negative heterozygosity-fitness correlations observed with microsatellites located in functional areas of the genome. Mol. Ecol. 20: 3949-3952.
50. Szulkin, M., N. Bierne, and P. David. 2010. Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: a time for reappraisal. Evolution 64:1202-1217.
51. Waldman, B., and J. S. McKinnon. 1993. Inbreeding and outbreeding in fishes, amphibians and reptiles. Pp. 250-282 in N. W. Tornhill, ed. The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding: theoretical and empirical perspectives. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
52. Willi, Y., and J. Van Buskirk. 2005. Genomic compatibility occurs over a wide range of parental genetic similarity in an outcrossing plant. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272:1333-1338.