Correlated inbreeding among relatives: Occurrence, magnitude, and implications

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 973-985

  Reid, Jane M ^a   Keller, Lukas F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Animal model; Genetic variance; Heritability; Heterozygosity; Pedigree; Relatedness; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIATION; HETEROZYGOSITY; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; MAGNITUDE; MATE CHOICE; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; RELATEDNESS; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMALIA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; FERTILITY; INBREEDING; MALE; MATE CHOICE; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; FERTILITY; INBREEDING; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MODELS, GENETIC; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 77954967034     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00865.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abney M, McPeek S M, Ober C. Estimation of variance components of quantitative traits in inbred populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2000, 66:629-650.
2. Bensch S, Andrén H, Hansson B, Pedersen H C, Sand H, Sejberg D, Wabakken P, Åkesson M, Liberg O. Selection for heterozygosity gives hope to a wild population of inbred wolves. PloS One 2006, 1:e72.
3. Bouzat J L, Johnson K. Genetic structure among closely spaced leks in a peripheral population of lesser prairie-chickens. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13:499-505.
4. Caballero A. Developments in the prediction of effective population size. Heredity 1994, 73:657-679.
5. Cavalli-Sforza L L, Kimura M, Barrai I. The probability of consanguineous marriages. Genetics 1966, 54:37-60.
6. Coltman D W, Pilkington J G, Smith J A, Pemberton J M. Parasite-mediated selection against inbred soay sheep in a free-living island population. Evolution 1999, 53:1259-1267.
7. Coltman D W, Pilkington J G, Pemberton J M. Fine-scale genetic structure in a free-living ungulate population. Mol. Ecol. 2003, 12:733-742.
8. Crnokrak P, Roff D A. Dominance variance: associations with selection and fitness. Heredity 1995, 75:530-540.
9. de Boer I J M, van Arendonk J A M. Prediction of additive and dominance effects in selected or unselected populations with inbreeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1992, 84:451-459.
10. Falconer D S, Mackay T F C. Introduction to quantitative genetics 1996, Longman, Lond
11. Francisco M R, Gibbs H L, Galetti M, Lunardi V O, Galetti Junior P M. Genetic structure in a tropical lek-breeding bird, the blue manakin (Chiroxiphia caudate) in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:4908-4918.
12. Fromhage L, Kokko H, Reid J M. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity. Evolution 2009, 63:684-694.
13. Hansson B, Bensch S, Hasselquist D, Nielson B. Restricted dispersal in a long-distance migrant bird with a patchy distribution, the great reed warbler. Oecologia 2002, 130:536-542.
14. Hill W G, Goddard M E, Visscher P M. Data and theory point to mainly additive genetic variance for complex traits. Plos Genet. 2008, 4:e1000008.
15. Höglund J, Piertney S B, Alatalo R V, Lindell J, Lundberg A, Rintamäki P T. Inbreeding depression and male fitness in black grouse. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2002, 269:711-715.
16. Jacquard A. The genetic structure of populations 1974, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
17. Jensen H, Bremset E M, Ringsby T H, Sæther B E. Multilocus heterozygosity and inbreeding depression in an insular house sparrow metapopulation. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:4066-4078.
18. Keller L F. Inbreeding and its fitness effects in an insular population of song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Evolution 1998, 52:240-250.
19. Kelly J K. Response to selection in partially self-fertilizing populations. I. Selection on a single trait. Evolution 1999, 53:336-349.
20. Kempenaers B. Mate choice and genetic quality: a review of the heterozygosity theory. Adv. Study Behav. 2007, 37:189-278.
21. Kokko H, Jennions M D, Brooks R. Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2006, 37:43-66.
22. Kotiaho J S, LeBas N R, Puurtinen M, Tomkins J L. On the resolution of the lek paradox. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23:1-3.
23. Kruuk L E B. Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the 'animal model'. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 2004, 359:873-890.
24. Kruuk L E B, Hadfield J D. How to separate genetic and environmental causes of similarity between relatives. J. Evol. Biol. 2007, 20:1890-1903.
25. Kruuk L E B, Slate J, Wilson A J. New answers for old questions: the evolutionary quantitative genetics of wild animal populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2009, 39:525-548.
26. Lynch M, Walsh B. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits 1998, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
27. Marshall T C, Coltman D W, Pemberton J M, Slate J, Spalton J A, Guinness F E, Smith J A, Pilkington J G, Clutton-Brock T H. Estimating the prevalence of inbreeding from incomplete pedigrees. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2002, 269:1533-1539.
28. Mazzi D, Künzler R, Largiadèr C R, Bakker T C M. Inbreeding affects female preference for symmetry in computer-animated sticklebacks. Behav. Genet. 2004, 34:417-424.
29. Merilä J, Sheldon B C. Genetic architecture of fitness and nonfitness traits: empirical patterns and development of ideas. Heredity 1999, 83:103-109.
30. Merilä J, Sheldon B C, Kruuk L E B. Explaining stasis: microevolutionary studies in natural populations. Genetica 2001, 112-113:199-222.
31. Mousseau T A, Fox C W. Maternal effects as adaptations 1998, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K
32. Norberg E, Sørensen A C. Inbreeding trend and inbreeding depression in the Danish populations of Texel, Shropshire and Oxford Down. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 85:299-304.
33. Nunney L. The influence of mating system and overlapping generations on effective population size. Evolution 1993, 47:1329-1341.
34. Ovaskainen O, Cano J M, Merilä J. A Bayesian framework for comparative quantitative genetics. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2008, 275:669-678.
35. Pamilo P. Effect of inbreeding on genetic relatedness. Hereditas 1985, 103:195-200.
36. Poissant J, Wilson A J, Festa-Bianchet M, Hogg J T, Coltman D W. Quantitative genetics and sex-specific selection on sexually dimorphic traits in bighorn sheep. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2008, 275:623-628.
37. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing 2008, http://www.r-project.org, R Development Core Team, Vienna, Austria, Available at
38. Reid J M. Secondary sexual ornamentation and non-additive genetic benefits of mate choice. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2007, 274:1395-1402.
39. Reid J M, Arcese P, Keller L F. Intrinsic parent-offspring correlation in inbreeding level in a song sparrow (Melospiza melodia) population open to immigration. Am. Nat. 2006, 168:1-13.
40. Reid J M, Arcese P, Keller L F. Individual phenotype, kinship and the occurrence of inbreeding in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Evolution 2008, 62:887-899.
41. Shuster S M. Sexual selection and mating systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:10009-10016.
42. Slate J, Kruuk L E B, Marshall T C, Pemberton J M, Clutton-Brock T H. Inbreeding depression influences lifetime breeding success in a wild population of red deer (Cervus elaphus). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2000, 267:1657-1662.
43. Szulkin M, Sheldon B C. Inbreeding: when parents transmit more than genes. Curr. Biol. 2007, 16:810-812.
44. van Noordwijk A J, Scharloo W. Inbreeding in an island population of the Great Tit. Evolution 1981, 35:674-688.
45. Webster M S, Pruett-Jones S, Westneat D F, Arnold S J. Measuring the effects of pairing success, extra-pair copulations and mate quality on the opportunity for sexual selection. Evolution 1995, 49:1147-1157.
46. Weir B S, Avery P J, Hill W G. Effect of mating structure on variation in inbreeding. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1980, 18:396-429.
47. Willi Y, van Buskirk J, Hoffmann A A. Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2006, 37:433-458.
48. Willis J H. Measures of phenotypic selection are biased by partial inbreeding. Evolution 1996, 50:1501-1511.
49. Wright S. Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. Am. Nat. 1922, 56:330-338.