Motivational and social cognitive predictors of doping intentions in elite sports: An integrated approach

Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2013, Pages

  Barkoukis, V ^a   Lazuras, L ^b   Tsorbatzoudis, H ^a   Rodafinos, A ^b  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (Greece)

Author keywords

Achievement goals; Doping; Self determination; Sportspersonship; Theory of planned behavior; Theory of triadic influence

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT GOALS; ARTICLE; ATHLETE; ATTITUDE; BEHAVIOR; DOPING; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMAN; MALE; MORALITY; MOTIVATION; PEER GROUP; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; SELF-DETERMINATION; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SPORT; SPORTSPERSONSHIP; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR; THEORY OF TRIADIC INFLUENCE;

ACHIEVEMENT GOALS; DOPING; SELF-DETERMINATION; SPORTSPERSONSHIP; THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR; THEORY OF TRIADIC INFLUENCE;

ATHLETES; ATTITUDE; DOPING IN SPORTS; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; INTENTION; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MORALS; MOTIVATION; PEER GROUP; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF EFFICACY; SOCIAL VALUES; SPORTS;

EID: 84884709832     PISSN: 09057188     EISSN: 16000838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/sms.12068     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Dec 1991: 50: 179-211.
2. Ames C. Classrooms: goals, structures and student motivation. J Educ Psychol 1992: 84: 261-271.
3. Anshel MH, Russell K. Effect of an educational program on knowledge and attitudes toward ingesting anabolic steroids among track and field athletes. J Drug Educ 1997: 27: 121-145.
4. Armitage CJ, Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: a meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol 2001: 40: 471-499.
5. Backhouse SH, Whitaker L, Petroczi A. Gateway to doping? Supplement use in the context of preferred competitive situations, doping attitude, beliefs, and norms. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2011: doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01374.x.
6. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: towards a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychol Rev 1977: 84: 191-215.
7. Barkoukis V, Lazuras L, Tsorbatzoudis H, Rodafinos A. Motivational and sportspersonship profiles of elite athletes in relation to doping behavior. Psychol Sport Exerc 2011: 12: 205-212.
8. Bowers LD, Clark RV, Shackleton C. A half-century of anabolic steroids in sport. Steroids 2009: 74: 285-287.
9. Conroy DE, Elliot AJ, Hofer SM. A 2 X 2 achievement goals questionnaire for sport. J Sport Exercise Psy 2003: 25: 456-476.
10. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2002.
11. Donahue EG, Miquelon P, Valois P, Goulet C, Buist A, Vallerand RJ. A motivational model of performance-enhancing substance use in elite athletes. J Sport Exercise Psy 2006: 28: 511-520.
12. Donovan RJ, Egger G, Kapernick V, Mendoza J. A conceptual framework for achieving performance enhancing drug compliance in sport. Sports Med 2002: 32: 269-284.
13. Dunn J, Causgrove-Dunn J. Goal orientations, perceptions of aggression, and sportspersonship in elite male youth ice hockey players. Sport Psychol 1999: 13: 183-200.
14. Dunn M, Mazanov J, Sitharthan G. Predicting future anabolic-androgenic steroid use intentions with current substance use: findings from an internet-based survey. Clin J Sport Med 2009: 19: 222-227.
15. Elliot A, McGregor H. A 2 X 2 achievement goal framework. J Pers Soc Psychol 2001: 80: 501-519.
16. Fishbein M. An integrative model for behavioral prediction and its application to health promotion. In: DiClemente RJ, Crosby RA, Kegler MC, eds. Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2009: 215-234.
17. Fishbein M, Yzer MC. Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. Comm Theory 2003: 13: 164-183.
18. Flay BR, Petraitis J. The theory of triadic influence: a new theory of health behavior with implications for preventive interventions. Adv Med Sociol 1994: 4: 19-44.
19. Flay BR, Snyder FJ, Petraitis J. The theory of triadic influence. In: DiClemente RJ, Crosby RA, Kegler MC, eds. Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2009: 215-234.
20. Gollwitzer PM, Bayer U, McCulloch K. The control of the unwanted. In: Hassin R, Uleman J, Bargh JA, eds. The new unconscious. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005: 485-515.
21. Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD. Integrating the theory of planned behaviour and self-determination theory in health behaviour: a meta-analysis. Br J Health Psychol 2009: 14: 275-302.
22. Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD, Biddle SJH. A meta-analytic review of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior in physical activity: predictive validity and the contribution of additional variables. J Sport Exercise Psy 2002: 24: 3-32.
23. Lazuras L, Barkoukis V, Rodafinos A, Tsorbatzoudis H. Predictors of doping intentions in elite-level athletes: a social cognition approach. J Sport Exercise Psy 2010: 32: 694-710.
24. Lemyre PN, Treasure D, Roberts G. Influence of variability in motivation and affect on elite athlete burnout susceptibility. J Sport Exercise Psy 2006: 28: 32-48.
25. Lentillon-Kaestner V. The development of doping use in high-level cycling: from team-organized doping to advances in the fight against doping. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2011: doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01370.x.
26. Lentillon-Kaestner V, Hagger MS, Hardcastle S. Health and doping in elite level cycling. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2012: 22: 596-606.
27. Lind G. Introduction to the Moral Judgment Test (MJT). Measurement of Moral judgment competence and moral attitudes for research and evaluation. [On-line publication]. 2002. Retrieved from http://www.uni-konstanz.de/ag-moral/mut/mjt-engl.htm.
28. Lucidi F, Zelli A, Mallia L, Grano C, Russo P, Violani C. The social-cognitive mechanisms regulating adolescents' use of doping substances. J Sports Sci 2008: 26: 447-456.
29. Markland D, Ingledew DK. The relationships between body mass and body image and relative autonomy for exercise among adolescent males and females. Psychol Sport Exerc 2007: 8: 836-853.
30. Ommundsen Y, Roberts GC, Lemyre PN, Treasure D. Perceived motivational climate in male youth soccer: relations to social-moral functioning, sportspersonship and team norm perceptions. Psychol Sport Exerc 2003: 25: 397-413.
31. Pelletier L, Fortier M, Vallerand R, Tuson K, Briere N. Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation and amotivation in sports: the Sport Motivation Scale (SMS). J Sport Exercise Psy 1995: 17: 35-53.
32. Petroczi A. Attitudes and doping: a structural equation analysis of the relationship between athletes' attitudes, sport orientation, and doping behavior. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2007: 2: 34.
33. Petroczi A, Aidman E. Psychological drivers in doping: the life-cycle model of performance enhancement. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2008: 3: 7.
34. Petroczi A, Mazanov J, Nepusz T, Backhouse SH, Naughton DP. Comfort in big numbers: does overestimation of doping prevalence in others indicate self-involvement? J Occup Med Toxicol 2008: 3: 19.
35. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 2008: 40: 879-891.
36. Rivis A, Sheeran P. Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analysis. Curr Psychol 2003: 22: 218-233.
37. Roberts G, Treasure D, Kavussanu M. Orthogonality of achievement goals and its relationship to beliefs about success and satisfaction in sport. Sport Psychol 1996: 10: 398-408.
38. Ross L, Greene D, House P. The "false-consensus effect:" An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. J Exp Soc Psychol 1977: 13: 279-301.
39. Sas-Nowosielski K, Swiatkowska L. Goal orientations and attitudes toward doping. Int J Sports Med 2008: 29: 607-612.
40. Stewart B, Smith ACT. Drug use in sport: implications for public policy. J Sport Soc Issues 2008: 32: 278-298.
41. Stoeber J, Stoll O, Pescheck E, Otto K. Perfectionism and goal orientations in athletes: relations with approach and avoidance orientations in mastery and performance goals. Psychol Sport Exerc 2008: 9: 102-121.
42. Strelan P, Boeckmann RJ. Why drug testing in elite sport does not work: perceptual deterrence theory and the role of personal moral beliefs. J Appl Soc Psychol 2006: 36: 2909-2934.
43. Striegel H, Ulrich R, Simon P. Randomized response estimates for doping and illicit drug use in elite athletes. Drug Alcohol Depend 2010: 106: 230-232.
44. Vallerand R, Losier G. An integrative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport. J Sport Psychol 1999: 11: 142-169.
45. Vallerand RJ, Brière NM, Blanchard C, Provencher P. Development and validation of the Multidimensional Sportspersonship Orientations Scale. J Sport Exercise Psy 1997: 19: 197-206.
46. Webb TL, Sheeran P. Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychol Bull 2006: 132: 249-268.
47. Wiefferink CH, Detmar SB, Coumans B, Vogels T, Paulussen TGW. Social psychological determinants of the use of performance-enhancing drugs by gym users. Health Educ Res 2008: 23: 70-80.