Likelihood of early detection of breast cancer in relation to false-positive risk in life-time mammographic screening: Population-based cohort study

Annals of Oncology

Volumn 24, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 2501-2506

  Otten, J D M ^a   Fracheboud, J ^b   den Heeten, G J ^c   Otto, S J ^b   Holland, R ^c   de Koning, H J ^b   Broeders, M J M ^a,c   Verbeek, A L M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c National Expert and Training Centre for Breast Cancer Screening   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasm; Cumulative risk; False negative reactions; False positive reactions; Mammography; Mass screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; COHORT ANALYSIS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NETHERLANDS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

BREAST NEOPLASM; CUMULATIVE RISK; FALSE-NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FALSE-POSITIVE REACTIONS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; RISK;

EID: 84884708355     PISSN: 09237534     EISSN: 15698041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt227     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Gøtzsche PC, Hartling OJ, Nielsen M et al Breast screening: the facts - or maybe not. BMJ 2009; 338: b86.
2. Giordano L, Patnick J, Paci E. Communicating the balance sheet in breast cancer screening. J Med Screen 2012; 19 (Suppl 1): 67-71.
3. Elveback L. Estimation of survivorship in chronic disease: the 'actuarial' method. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53(282): 420-40.
4. Greenwood M. The errors of sampling of the survivorship tables. In: Natural Duration of Cancer. Reports of Public Health and Statistical Subjects, No. 33, Appendix I. His Majesty's Stationary Office, London. 1926.
5. Karssemeijer N, Bluekens AM, Beijerinck D et al Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2009; 253(2): 353-8.
6. Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM et al Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med 1998; 338(16): 1089-96.
7. Christiansen CL, Wang F, Barton MB et al Predicting the cumulative risk of falsepositive mammograms. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92(20): 1657-66.
8. Hofvind S, Thoresen S, Tretli S. The cumulative risk of a false-positive recall in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. Cancer 2004; 101(7): 1501-7.
9. Castells X, Molins E, Macia F. Cumulative false positive recall rate and association with participant related factors in a population based breast cancer screening programme. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60(4): 316-21.
10. Njor SH, Olsen AH, Schwartz W et al Predicting the risk of a false-positive test for women following a mammography screening programme. J Med Screen 2007; 14 (2): 94-7.
11. Roman R, Sala M, Salas D et al Effect of protocol-related variables and women's characteristics on the cumulative false-positive risk in breast cancer screening. Ann Oncol 2012; 23(1): 104-11.
12. Puliti D, Miccinesi G, Zappa M. More on screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2011; 364(3): 284-5.
13. Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, Smith RA. Modelling the cumulative risk of a falsepositive screening test. Stat Methods Med Res 2010; 19(5): 429-49.
14. Hofvind S, Ponti A, Patnick J et al False-positive results in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review and survey of service screening programmes. J Med Screen 2012; 19 Suppl 1: 57-66.
15. Vainio H, Bianchini F. Effectiveness of screening; Hazards (risks) of screening. Breast Cancer Screening. Lyon: IARCPress; 2002. p. 135-56.
16. Smith-Bindman R, Chu PW, Miglioretti DL et al Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom. JAMA 2003; 290 (16): 2129-37.
17. Fletcher SW, Elmore JG. False-positive mammograms-can the USA learn from Europe?. Lancet 2005; 365(9453): 7-8.
18. Otten JD, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JH et al Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97(10): 748-54.
19. Del Turco MR, Mantellini P, Ciatto S et al Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189(4): 860-6.
20. Sala M, Comas M, Macià F et al Implementation of digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program: effect of screening round on recall rate and cancer detection. Radiology 2009; 252(1): 31-9.
21. Otten JD, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ et al Life expectancy of screen-detected invasive breast cancer patients compared with women invited to the Nijmegen screening program. Cancer 2010; 116: 586-91.
22. De Gelder R, Heijnsdijk AE, van Ravesteyn NT et al Interpreting overdiagnosis estimates in population-based mammography screening. Epidemiol Rev 2011; 33 (1): 111-21.
23. Van Schoor G, Moss SM, Otten JD et al Increasingly strong reduction in breast cancer mortality due to screening. Br J Cancer 2011; 104(6): 910-4.