Cumulative false positive recall rate and association with participant related factors in a population based breast cancer screening programme

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 316-321

  Castells, Xavier ^a,b   Molins, Eduard ^a,b   Macià, Francesc ^b  

^a INST MUNIC D INVESTIGACIO MEDICA   (Spain)

^b Del Mar University   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER; HEALTH MONITORING; WOMENS HEALTH;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLIMACTERIUM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; POPULATION RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPAIN; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; BIOPSY; BODY MASS INDEX; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RISK FACTORS; SPAIN;

BARCELONA [BARCELONA (PRV)]; BARCELONA [CATALONIA]; CATALONIA; EURASIA; EUROPE; SOUTHERN EUROPE; SPAIN;

EID: 33645232760     PISSN: 0143005X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jech.2005.042119     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bull AR, Campbell MJ. Assessment of the psychological impact of a breast screening programme. Br J Radiol 2001;64:510-15.
2. Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer BK, et al. Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms. Ann Intern Med 1991;114:657-61.
3. McCann J, Stockton D, Godward S. Impact of false-positive mammography on subsequent screening attendance and risk of cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2002;4:R11.
4. Lampic C, Thurfjell E, Sjoden PO. The influence of a false-positive mammogram on a woman's subsequent behaviour for detecting breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2003;39:1730-7.
5. Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, et al. Ten-year risk of false-positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1089-96.
6. Hofvind S, Thoresen S, Tretli S. The cumulative risk of a false-positive recall in the Norwegian breast cancer screening program. Cancer 2004;101:1501-7.
7. Barratt A, Howard K, Irwing L, et al. Model of outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices. BMJ 2005;330:936.
8. Fletcher SW, Elmore JG. False positive mammograms-can the USA learn from Europe? Lancet 2005;365:7-8.
9. Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening. Luxenburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2001.
10. Vainio H, Bianchini F, eds. IARC handbooks of cancer prevention. Vol 7. Breast cancer screening. Lyon: IARC Press, 2002:119-34.
11. Thornton H, Edwards A, Baum M. Women need better information about routine mammography. BMJ 2003;327:101-3.
12. Smith-Bindman R, Ballard-Barbash R, Miglioretti DL, et al. Comparing the performance of mammography screening in the USA and the UK. J Med Screen 2005;12:50-4.
13. Esserman L, Cowley H, Eberle C, et al. Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:369-75.
14. Kan L, Olivotto IA, Warren Burhenne U, et al. Standardized abnormal interpretation and cancer detection ratios to assess reading volume and reader performance in a breast screening program. Radiology 2000;215:563-7.
15. Beam CA, Conant EF, Sickles EA. Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:282-90.
16. Yankaskas BC, Klabunde CN, Ancelle-Park R, et al. International comparison of performance measures for screening mammography: can it be done? J Med Screen 2004;11:187-93.
17. Lynge E, Olsen AH, Fracheboud J, et al. Reporting of performance indicators of mammography screening in Europe. Eur J Cancer Prev 2003;12:213-22.
18. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, et al. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer. JAMA 1993;270:2444-50.
19. Lidbrink E, Elfving J, Frisell J, et al. Neglected aspects of false positive findings of mammography in breast cancer screening: analysis of false positive cases from the Stockholm trial. BMJ 1996;312:273-6.
20. Christiansen CL, Wang F, Barton MB, et al. Predicting the cumulative risk of false-positive mammograms. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1657-66.
21. Gelfand AE, Wang F. Modelling the cumulative risk for a false-positive under repeated screening events. Stat Med 2000;19:1865-79.
22. Baker S G, Erwin D, Kramer BS. Estimating the cumulative risk of false positive cancer screenings. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:1-6.
23. Xu J-L, Fagerstrom RM, et al. Estimating the cumulative risk of false-positive test in a repeated screening program. Biometrics 2004;60:651-60.