Modelling the cumulative risk of a false-positive screening test

Statistical Methods in Medical Research

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 429-449

  Hubbard, Rebecca A ^a   Miglioretti, Diana L ^a   Smith, Robert A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PROBABILITY; SCREENING TEST; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROBABILITY; RISK; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77957798502     PISSN: 09622802     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0962280209359842     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Morrison A. Screening in Chronic Disease. Oxford University Press, New York ; 1992.
2. Humphrey LL, Helfand M., Chan BK, Woolf SH Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine 2002 ; 137: 347-360.
3. Smith RA, Duffy SW, Gabe R., Tabar L., Yen AM, Chen TH The randomised trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned? Radiologic Clinics of North America 2004 ; 42: 793-806.
4. Brett J., Bankhead C., Henderson B., Watson E., Austoker J. The psychological impact of mammographic screening: A systematic review. Psycho-oncology 2005 ; 14 (11). 917-938.
5. Brewer NT, Salz T., Lillie SE Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms. Annals of Internal Medicine 2007 ; 146 (7). 502-510.
6. Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, Polk S., Arena PJ, Fletcher SW Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. New England Journal of Medicine 1998 ; 338 (16). 1089-1096.
7. Gelfand AE, Wang F. Modelling the cumulative risk for a false-positive under repeated screening events. Statistics in Medicine 2000 ; 19 (14). 1865-1879.
8. Christiansen CL, Wang F., Barton MB, Kreuter W., Elmore JG, Gelfand AE, et al. Predicting the cumulative risk of false-positive mammograms. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2000 ; 92 (20). 1657-1666.
9. Burman ML, Taplin SH, Herta DF, Elmore JG Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organisation. Annals of Internal Medicine 1999 ; 131 (1). 1-6.
10. Xu JL, Fagerstrom RM, Prorok PC, Kramer BS Estimating the cumulative risk of a false-positive test in a repeated screening program. Biometrics 2004 ; 60 (3). 651-660.
11. Gelfand AE, Smith AF Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1990 ; 85: 398-409.
12. Baker SG, Erwin D., Kramer BS Estimating the cumulative risk of false positive cancer screenings. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2003 ; 3: 11. Available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/3/11/
13. Yankaskas BC, Taplin SH, Ichikawa L., Geller BM, Rosenberg RD, Carney PA, et al. Association between mammography timing and measures of screening performance in the United States. Radiology 2005 ; 234 (2). 363-373.
14. Lane P., Nelder J. Analysis of covariance and standardisation as instances of prediction. Biometrics 1982 ; 38 (3). 613-621.
15. Graubard B., Korn E. Predictive margines with survey data. Biometrics 1999 ; 55 (2). 652-659.
16. Ballard-Barbash R., Taplin SH, Yankaskas BC, et al. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database. American Journal of Roentgenology 1997 ; 169: 1001-1008.
17. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Breast Imaging Atlas (4 th edn). American College of Radiology, Reston, VA ; 2003.
18. Taplin SH, Ichikawa LE, Kerlikowske K., et al. Concordance of breast imaging reporting and data system assessments and management recommendations in screening mammography. Radiology 2002 ; 222 (2). 529-535.
19. Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas BC, Abraham LA, et al. Performance benchmarks for screening mammography. Radiology 2006 ; 241 (1). 55-66.
20. NHS Breast Screening Programme. Annual Review 2008. NHS Cancer Screening Programmes ; 2009.
21. Hofvind S., Thoresen S., Tretli S. The cumulative risk of a false-positive recall in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. Cancer 2004 ; 101 (7). 1501-1507.
22. Castells X., Molins E., Macia F. Cumulative false positive recall rate and association with participant related factors in a population based breast cancer screening programme. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2006 ; 60 (4). 316-321.
23. Njor SH, Olsen AH, Schwartz W., Vejborg I., Lynge E. Predicting the risk of a false-positive test for women following a mammography screening programme. Journal of Medical Screening 2007 ; 14 (2). 94-97.
24. Smith-Bindman R., Chu PW, Miglioretti DL, et al. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and United Kingdom. Journal of the American Medical Association 2003 ; 290 (16). 2129-2137.
25. Yankaskas BC, Klabunde CN, Ancelle-Park R., et al. International comparison of performance measures for screening mammography: can it be done? Journal of Medical Screening 2004 ; 11: 187-193.
26. Hofvind S., Vacek PM, Skelly J., Weaver DL, Geller BM Comparing screening mammography for early breast cancer detection in Vermont and Norway. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2008 ; 100 (15). 1082-1091.
27. Blanchard K., Colbert JA, Kopans DB, et al. Long-term risk of false-positive screening results and subsequent biopsy as a function of mammography use. Radiology 2006 ; 240 (2). 335-342.
28. Hunt KA, Rosen EL, Sickles EA Outcome analysis for women undergoing annual versus biennial screening mammography: a review of 24,211 examinations. American Journal of Roentgenology 1999 ; 173 (2). 285-289.
29. Michaelson JS, Kopans DB, Cady B. The breast carcinoma screening interval is important. Cancer 2000 ; 88: 1282-1284.
30. Beam CA, Lavde PM, Sullivan DC Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample. Archives of Internal Medicine 1996 ; 156: 209-213.
31. Wagner RF, Beam CA, Beiden SV Reader variability in mammography and its implications for expected utility over the population of readers and cases. Medical Decision Making 2004 ; 24: 561-572.
32. Barlow WE, Chi C., Carney PA, et al. Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2004 ; 96 (24). 1840-1850.
33. Smith-Bindman R., Chu P., Miglioretti DL, et al. Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2005 ; 97 (5). 358-367.
34. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S., Sox HC, Fischhoff B., Welch HG US women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross sectional survey. British Medical Journal 2000 ; 320: 1635-1640.