Crozier's paradox revisited: Maintenance of genetic recognition systems by disassortative mating

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Holman, Luke ^a,b   Van Zweden, Jelle S ^a,c   Linksvayer, Timothy A ^a,d   D'Ettorre, Patrizia ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 13   (France)

Author keywords

Altruism; Frequency dependent selection; Green beard; Kin discrimination; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

BACTERIUM; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FREQUENCY DEPENDENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODEL; KIN RECOGNITION; KIN SELECTION; MATE CHOICE; POLYMORPHISM; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SEXUAL SELECTION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; VERTEBRATE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); VERTEBRATA;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; HUMAN; MATE CHOICE; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; HUMANS; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; REPRODUCTION;

EID: 84884648809     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-211     Document Type: Article

References (123)

1. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I and II. Hamilton WD, J Theor Biol 1964 7 1 52 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 5875341
2. A general model for kin selection. Queller DC, Evolution 1992 46 376 380 10.2307/2409858
3. Evolutionary explanations for cooperation. West SA, Griffin AS, Gardner A, Curr Biol 2007 17 661 R672 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.004 17714660 (Pubitemid 47259365)
4. The joint effects of kin, multilevel selection and indirect genetic effects on response to genetic selection. Bijma P, Wade MJ, J Evol Biol 2008 21 1175 1188 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01550.x 18547354
5. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. III. Social evolution. McGlothlin JW, Moore AJ, Wolf JB, Brodie ED, Evolution 2010 64 2558 5646 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01012.x 20394666
6. Recognition systems and biological organization: The perception component of social recognition. Mateo JM, Ann Zool Fennici 2004 41 729 745 (Pubitemid 40113085)
7. Greenbeards. Gardner A, West SA, Evolution 2010 64 25 38 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00842.x 19780812
8. Kin recognition in an annual plant. Dudley SA, File AL, Biol Lett 2007 3 435 438 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0232 17567552
9. The social evolution of somatic fusion. Aanen DK, Debets AJM, de Visser JAGM, Hoekstra RF, Bioessays 2008 30 1193 1203 10.1002/bies.20840 18937373
10. Genetic determinants of self identity and social recognition in bacteria. Gibbs KA, Urbanowski ML, Greenberg EP, Science 2008 321 256 259 10.1126/science.1160033 18621670 (Pubitemid 351989098)
11. Kin discrimination in juvenile mandrills, Mandrillus sphinx. Charpentier MJE, Peignot P, Hossaert-Mckey M, Wickings EJ, Anim Behav 2007 73 37 45 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.02.026 (Pubitemid 46013834)
12. Nestmate recognition in social insects and the role of hydrocarbons. van Zweden JS, d'Ettorre P, Insect Hydrocarbons: Biology, Biochemistry and Chemcial Ecology Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Bagnères AG, Blomquist GJ, 2010 222 243
13. Polymorphic members of the lag gene family mediate kin discrimination in Dictyostelium. Benabentos R, Hirose S, Sucgang R, Curk T, Katoh M, Ostrowski EA, Strassmann JE, Queller DC, Zupan B, Shaulsky G, Kuspa A, Curr Biol 2009 19 567 572 10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.037 19285397
14. Model systems of invertebrate allorecognition. Rosengarten RD, Nicotra ML, Curr Biol 2011 21 82 R92 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.061 21256442
15. Genetic clonal recognition abilities in marine invertebrates must be maintained by selection for something else. Crozier RH, Evolution 1986 40 1100 1101 10.2307/2408769
16. The evolution of selective aggression conditioned on allorecognition specificity. Grosberg RK, Quinn JF, Evolution 1989 43 504 515 10.2307/2409055 (Pubitemid 20418200)
17. Constraints on the origin and maintenance of genetic kin recognition. Rousset F, Roze D, Evolution 2007 61 2320 2330 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00191.x 17711465 (Pubitemid 47512222)
18. Genetic diversity, asymmetrical aggression, and recognition in a widespread invasive species. Tsutsui ND, Suarez AV, Grosberg RK, PNAS 2003 100 1078 1083 10.1073/pnas.0234412100 12538869 (Pubitemid 36183958)
19. On the evolution of harming and recognition in finite panmictic and infinite structured populations. Lehmann L, Feldman MW, Rousset F, Evolution 2009 63 2896 2913 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00778.x 19624725
20. Altruism through beard chromodynamics. Jansen VAA, van Baalen M, Nature 2006 440 663 666 10.1038/nature04387 16572169
21. Kin recognition: Functions and mechanisms a review. Hepper PG, Biol Rev 1986 61 63 93 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1986.tb00427.x 3521752
22. Fletcher DJC, Michener CD, Kin Recognition in Animals New York: Wiley 1987
23. The evolution of allorecognition specificity in clonal invertebrates. Grosberg RK, Q Rev Biol 1988 63 377 412 10.1086/416026 (Pubitemid 19324564)
24. Recognition systems: From components to conservation. Starks PT, Ann Zool Fenn 2004 41 689 690 (Pubitemid 40113082)
25. Genetically based kin recognition systems. Getz WM, J Theor Biol 1981 92 209 226 10.1016/0022-5193(81)90288-5 (Pubitemid 12199476)
26. An analysis of learned kin recognition in Hymenoptera. Getz WM, J Theor Biol 1982 99 585 597 10.1016/0022-5193(82)90212-0 (Pubitemid 13176397)
27. Genetic aspects of kin recognition: concepts, models, and synthesis. Crozier RH, Kin Recognition in Animals New York: Wiley, Fletcher DJC, Michener CD, 1987 55 73
28. Kin recognition by phenotype matching. Lacy RC, Sherman PW, Am Nat 1983 121 489 512 10.1086/284078 (Pubitemid 14272790)
29. The evolution of genetic odor-cue diversity in social Hymenoptera. Ratnieks FLW, Am Nat 1991 137 202 226 10.1086/285154
30. Altruism via kin-selection strategies that rely on arbitrary tags with which they coevolve. Axelrod R, Hammond RA, Grafen A, Evolution 2004 58 1833 1838 15446434 (Pubitemid 39147710)
31. Host-parasite coevolution: Evidence for rare advantage and time-lagged selection in a natural population. Dybdahl MF, Lively CM, Evolution 1998 52 1057 1066 10.2307/2411236 (Pubitemid 28417887)
32. MHC allele frequency distributions under parasite-driven selection: A simulation model. Ejsmond MJ, Babik W, Radwan J, BMC Evol Biol 2010 10 332 10.1186/1471-2148-10-332 20979635
33. Making progress in genetic kin recognition among vertebrates. Hurst J, Beynon R, J Biol 2010 9 13 10.1186/jbiol221 20236486
34. A mosaic of chemical coevolution in a large blue butterfly. Nash DR, Als TD, Maile R, Jones G, Boomsma JJ, Science 2008 319 88 90 10.1126/science.1149180 18174441
35. Communication between hosts and social parasites. Nash DR, Boomsma JJ, Sociobiology of Communication: an interdisciplinary perspective Oxford: Oxford University Press, d'Ettorre P, Hughes DP, 2008 55 79
36. Is parasite pressure a driver of chemical cue diversity in ants? Martin SJ, Helantera H, Drijfhout FP, Proc Roy Soc B 2011 278 496 503 10.1098/rspb.2010.1047
37. Aggression by polyembryonic wasp soldiers correlates with kinship but not resource competition. Giron D, Dunn DW, Hardy ICW, Strand MR, Nature 2004 430 676 679 10.1038/nature02721 15295600 (Pubitemid 39061682)
38. Host resistance and the evolution of kin recognition in polyembryonic wasps. Giron D, Strand MR, Proc Roy Soc B 2004 271 395 S398 10.1098/rsbl.2004. 0205
39. Mate selection and the evolution of highly polymorphic self/nonself recognition genes. Grosberg RK, Hart MW, Science 2000 289 2111 2114 10.1126/science.289.5487.2111 11000110
40. Crow JF, Kimura M, An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory Caldwell, NJ: Blackwell Press 1970
41. Soft selection, hard selection, kin selection, and group selection. Wade MJ, Am Nat 1985 125 61 73 10.1086/284328 (Pubitemid 16276189)
42. Altruism in viscous populations-an inclusive fitness model. Taylor PD, Evol Ecol 1992 6 352 356 10.1007/BF02270971 (Pubitemid 23401161)
43. Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Pusey A, Wolf M, Trends Ecol Evol 1996 11 201 206 10.1016/0169-5347(96)10028-8 21237809
44. Altruism and social cheating in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Strassmann JE, Zhu Y, Queller DC, Nature 2000 408 965 967 10.1038/35050087 11140681 (Pubitemid 32101640)
45. Kin discrimination increases with genetic distance in a social amoeba. Ostrowski EA, Katoh M, Shaulsky G, Queller DC, Strassmann JE, PLoS Biol 2008 6 287 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060287 19067487
46. Self-recognition in social amoebae is mediated by allelic pairs of tiger genes. Hirose S, Benabentos R, Ho HI, Kuspa A, Shaulsky G, Science 2011 333 467 470 10.1126/science.1203903 21700835
47. Variation, sex, and social cooperation: Molecular population genetics of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Flowers JM, Li SI, Stathos A, Saxer G, Ostrowski EA, Queller DC, Strassmann JE, Purugganan MD, PLoS Genet 2010 6 1001013 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001013 20617172
48. Vegetative incompatibility and the mating-type locus in the cellular slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum. Robson GE, Williams KL, Genetics 1979 93 861 875 17248984 (Pubitemid 10077471)
49. Sex determination in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Bloomfield G, Skelton J, Ivens A, Tanaka Y, Kay RR, Science 2010 330 1533 1536 10.1126/science.1197423 21148389
50. dictyBase update 2011: web 2.0 functionality and the initial steps towards a genome portal for the Amoebozoa. Gaudet P, Fey P, Basu S, Bushmanova YA, Dodson R, Sheppard KA, Just EM, Kibbe WA, Chisholm RL, Nucleic Acids Res 2011 39 620 D624 10.1093/nar/gkq1103 21087999
51. Molecular characterization of tol, a mediator of mating-type-associated vegetative incompatibility in Neurospora crassa. Shiu PKT, Glass NL, Genetics 1999 151 545 555 9927450 (Pubitemid 29082925)
52. Evolution and diversity of a fungal self/nonself recognition locus. Hall C, Welch J, Kowbel DJ, Glass NL, PLoS One 2010 5 14055 10.1371/journal.pone. 0014055 21124910
53. Evolution of a protochordate allorecognition locus. de Tomaso AW, Weissman IL, Science 2004 303 977 10.1126/science.1094952 14963321 (Pubitemid 38209694)
54. Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits. Blows MW, Chenoweth SF, Hine E, Am Nat 2004 163 329 340 10.1086/381941 15026971 (Pubitemid 38459255)
55. Cuticular hydrocarbons are heritable in the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Thomas ML, Simmons LW, J Evol Biol 2008 21 801 806 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01514.x 18355187 (Pubitemid 351521542)
56. Blending of heritable recognition cues among ant nestmates creates distinct colony gestalt odours but prevents within-colony nepotism. van Zweden JS, Brask JB, Christensen JH, Boomsma JJ, Linksvayer TA, d'Ettorre P, J Evol Biol 2010 23 1498 1508 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02020.x 20492083
57. Kin-informative recognition cues in ants. Nehring V, Evison SEF, Santorelli LA, d'Ettorre P, Hughes WOH, Proc Roy Soc B 2011 278 1942 1948 10.1098/rspb.2010.2295
58. Genetic constraints on dishonesty and caste dimorphism in an ant. Holman L, Linksvayer TA, d'Ettorre P, Am Nat 2013 181 161 170 10.1086/668828 23348771
59. Kin recognition and incest avoidance in a group-living insect. Lihoreau M, Zimmer C, Rivault C, Behav Ecol 2007 18 880 887 10.1093/beheco/arm046 (Pubitemid 47357643)
60. Mutual mate choice: When it pays both sexes to avoid inbreeding. Lihoreau M, Zimmer C, Rivault C, PLoS One 2008 3 7
61. Kin recognition via cuticular hydrocarbons shapes cockroach social life. Lihoreau M, Rivault C, Behav Ecol 2008 20 46 53
62. German cockroach males maximize their inclusive fitness by avoiding mating with kin. Lihoreau M, Rivault C, Anim Behav 2010 80 303 309 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.05.011
63. Ants recognize foes and not friends. Guerrieri FJ, Nehring V, Jørgensen CG, Nielsen J, Galizia CG, d'Ettorre P, Proc Roy Soc B 2009 276 2461 2468 10.1098/rspb.2008.1860
64. Rapid decision-making with side-specific perceptual discrimination in ants. Stroeymeyt N, Guerrieri FJ, van Zweden JS, d'Ettorre P, PLoS One 2010 5 12377 10.1371/journal.pone.0012377 20808782
65. Unicolonial ants: where do they come from, what are they and where are they going? Helanterä H, Strassmann JE, Carrillo J, Queller DC, Trends Ecol Evol 2009 24 341 349 10.1016/j.tree.2009.01.013 19328589
66. Sex determination and population biology in the hymenoptera. Cook JM, Crozier RH, Trends Ecol Evol 1995 10 281 286 10.1016/0169-5347(95)90011-X 21237037
67. Inbreeding and reproductive investment in the ant Formica exsecta. Vitikainen E, Liautard CH, Sundström L, Evolution 2011 65 2026 2037 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01273.x 21729057
68. Recognition of female kin by male bees through olfactory signals. Smith BH, PNAS 1983 80 4551 4553 10.1073/pnas.80.14.4551 16593340 (Pubitemid 13077877)
69. Nestmate recognition as an inbreeding avoidance mechanism in bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Foster RL, J Kansas Entomol Soc 1992 65 238 243
70. Incest avoidance, fluctuating asymmetry, and the consequences of inbreeding in Iridomyrmex humilis, an ant with multiple queen colonies. Keller L, Passera L, Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1993 33 191 199 10.1007/BF00216600 (Pubitemid 24411768)
71. The significance of intercolonial variation of cuticular hydrocarbons for inbreeding avoidance in ant sexuals. Oppelt A, Spitzenpfeil N, Kroiss J, Heinze J, Anim Behav 2008 76 1029 1034 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.05.020
72. Genetic component of bee odor in kin recognition. Greenberg L, Science 1979 206 1095 1097 10.1126/science.206.4422.1095 17787485 (Pubitemid 10208888)
73. Pheromonal covariation and kinship in social bee Lasioglossum zephyrum (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Smith BH, Wenzel JW, J Chem Ecol 1988 14 87 94 10.1007/BF01022533
74. Kin recognition in eusocial wasps. Gamboa GJ, Ann Zool Fennici 2004 41 789 808 (Pubitemid 40113088)
75. Host specific social parasites (Psithyrus) indicate chemical recognition system in bumblebees. Martin SJ, Carruthers JM, Williams PH, Drijfhout FP, J Chem Ecol 2010 36 855 863 10.1007/s10886-010-9805-3 20509042
76. Nestmate recognition between males and gynes of the social wasp Polistes fuscatus (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Ryan RE, Gamboa GJ, Ann Entomol Soc Am 1986 79 572 575
77. Sexual interactions and nestmate recognition in invasive populations of Polistes dominulus wasps. Liebert A, Wilson-Rich N, Johnson C, Starks P, Insect Soc 2010 57 457 463 10.1007/s00040-010-0105-2
78. Nestmateship and body size do not influence mate choice in males and females: A laboratory study of a primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata. Shilpa MC, Sen R, Gadagkar R, Behav Proc 2010 85 42 46 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.06. 004
79. Kin recognition and inbreeding reluctance in bumblebees. Whitehorn PR, Tinsley MC, Goulson D, Apidologie 2009 40 627 633 10.1051/apido/2009050
80. The evolution of mating preferences and major histocompatibility complex genes. Penn DJ, Potts WK, Am Nat 1999 153 145 164 10.1086/303166 (Pubitemid 29139433)
81. The scent of genetic compatibility: Sexual selection and the major histocompatibility complex. Penn DJ, Ethology 2002 108 1 21 10.1046/j.1439-0310. 2002.00768.x (Pubitemid 34134669)
82. Communal nesting patterns in mice implicate MHC genes in kin recognition. Manning CJ, Wakeland EK, Potts WK, Nature 1992 360 581 583 10.1038/360581a0 1461279
83. Parent-progeny recognition as a function of MHC odortype identity. Yamazaki K, Beauchamp GK, Curran M, Bard J, Boyse EA, PNAS 2000 97 10500 10502 10.1073/pnas.180320997 10973487
84. Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex. Yamazaki K, Boyse EA, Miké V, Thaler HT, Mathieson BJ, Abbott J, Boyse J, Zayas ZA, Thomas L, J Exp Med 1976 144 1324 1335 10.1084/jem.144.5.1324 1032893
85. Familial imprinting determines H-2 selective mating preferences. Yamazaki K, Beauchamp G, Kupniewski D, Bard J, Thomas L, Boyse E, Science 1988 240 1331 1332 10.1126/science.3375818 3375818
86. New perspectives on mate choice and the MHC. Jordan WC, Bruford MW, Heredity 1998 81 239 245 10.1038/sj.hdy.6884280 9800367 (Pubitemid 28448275)
87. Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype. Potts WK, Manning CJ, Wakeland EK, Nature 1991 352 619 621 10.1038/352619a0 1865924 (Pubitemid 21912392)
88. Kin recognition and inbreeding avoidance in zebrafish, Danio rerio, is based on phenotype matching. Gerlach G, Lysiak N, Anim Behav 2006 71 1371 1377 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.10.010 (Pubitemid 43867484)
89. Kin recognition in zebrafish: a 24-hour window for olfactory imprinting. Gerlach G, Hodgins-Davis A, Avolio C, Schunter C, Proc Roy Soc B 2008 275 2165 2170 10.1098/rspb.2008.0647
90. "Good genes as heterozygosity": the major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Landry C, Garant D, Proc Roy Soc B 2001 268 1279 1285 10.1098/rspb.2001.1659 (Pubitemid 32622382)
91. The function of mate choice in sticklebacks: optimizing Mhc genetics. Milinski M, J Fish Biol 2003 63 1 16 (Pubitemid 38592455)
92. Influence of genetic dissimilarity in the reproductive success and mate choice of brown trout-females fishing for optimal MHC dissimilarity. Forsberg LA, Dannewitz J, Petersson E, Grahn M, J Evol Biol 2007 20 1859 1869 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01380.x 17714303 (Pubitemid 47262855)
93. MHC-mediated mate choice increases parasite resistance in salmon. Consuegra S, García de Leaniz C, Proc Roy Soc B 2008 275 1397 1403 10.1098/rspb.2008.0066 (Pubitemid 351653009)
94. Social recognition in wild fish populations. Ward AJW, Webster MM, Hart PJB, Proc Roy Soc B 2007 274 1071 1077 10.1098/rspb.2006.0231 (Pubitemid 47056732)
95. Present knowledge of kin discrimination in salmonids. Olsén H, Genetica 1998 104 295 299 10.1023/A:1026413404363 16220378 (Pubitemid 29284848)
96. Major histocompatibility complex and kin discrimination in Atlantic salmon and brook trout. Rajakaruna RS, Brown JA, Kaukinen KH, Miller KM, Mol Ecol 2006 15 4569 4575 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03113.x 17107483 (Pubitemid 44749569)
97. MHC-mediated spatial distribution in brown trout (Salmo trutta) fry. O'Farrell B, Benzie J, McGinnity P, Carlsson J, Heredity 2011 108 403 409 21934705
98. MHC and fertilization success in the Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus). Skarstein F, Folstad I, Liljedal S, Grahn M, Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2005 57 374 380 10.1007/s00265-004-0860-z (Pubitemid 40564287)
99. Miller HC, Moore JA Nelson NJ: Influence of major histocompatibility complex genotype on mating success in a free-ranging reptile population. Proc Roy Soc B 2009
100. Olfactory kin recognition in a songbird. Krause ET, Krüger O, Kohlmeier P, Caspers BA, Biol Lett 2012 8 327 329 10.1098/rsbl.2011.1093 22219391
101. Kin recognition and inbreeding avoidance in wild birds: the first evidence for individual kin-related odour recognition. Bonadonna F, Sanz-Aguilar A, Anim Behav 2012 84 509 513 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.06.014
102. An MHC component to kin recognition and mate choice in birds: Predictions, progress, and prospects. Zelano B, Edwards SV, Am Nat 2002 160 225 S237 10.1086/342897 18707479
103. MHC-based patterns of social and extra-pair mate choice in the Seychelles warbler. Richardson DS, Komdeur J, Burke T, Schantz von T, Proc Roy Soc B 2005 272 759 767 10.1098/rspb.2004.3028 (Pubitemid 41411134)
104. Cryptic preference for MHC-dissimilar females in male red junglefowl, Gallus gallus. Gillingham MAF, Richardson DS, Lovlie H, Moynihan A, Worley K, Pizzari T, Proc Roy Soc B 2009 276 1083 1092 10.1098/rspb.2008.1549
105. Microsatellite markers reveal the potential for kin selection on black grouse leks. Höglund J, Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, Rintamaki PT, Lindell J, Proc Roy Soc B 1999 266 813 816 10.1098/rspb.1999.0710 (Pubitemid 29204211)
106. Peacocks lek with relatives even in the absence of social and environmental cues. Petrie M, Krupa A, Burke T, Nature 1999 401 155 157 10.1038/43651 (Pubitemid 29436316)
107. Fine-scale genetic structuring on Manacus manacusleks. Shorey L, Piertney S, Stone J, Höglund J, Nature 2000 408 352 353 10.1038/35042562 11099040
108. Kin selection and cooperative courtship in wild turkeys. Krakauer AH, Nature 2005 434 69 72 10.1038/nature03325 15744300 (Pubitemid 40349385)
109. Learned kin recognition cues in a social bird. Sharp SP, McGowan A, Wood MJ, Hatchwell BJ, Nature 2005 434 1127 1130 10.1038/nature03522 15858573 (Pubitemid 40663490)
110. The genetic basis of zebra finch vocalizations. Forstmeier W, Burger C, Temnow K, Derégnaucourt S, Evolution 2009 63 2114 2130 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00688.x 19453380
111. Divorce in cooperatively breeding long-tailed tits: a consequence of inbreeding avoidance? Hatchwell BJ, Russell AF, Ross DJ, Fowlie MK, Proc Roy Soc B 2000 267 813 819 10.1098/rspb.2000.1076 (Pubitemid 30229374)
112. Kin discrimination and the benefit of helping in cooperatively breeding vertebrates. Griffin AS, West SA, Science 2003 302 634 636 10.1126/science. 1089402 14576431 (Pubitemid 37310917)
113. Eusociality in a mammal-Cooperative breeding in naked mole rat colonies. Jarvis JUM, Science 1981 212 571 573 10.1126/science.7209555 7209555 (Pubitemid 11068562)
114. Kin discrimination and female mate choice in the naked mole-rat Heterocephalus glaber. Clarke FM, Faulkes CG, Proc Roy Soc B 1999 266 1995 2002 10.1098/rspb.1999.0877 (Pubitemid 29479203)
115. MHC-associated mating strategies and the importance of overall genetic diversity in an obligate pair-living primate. Schwensow N, Fietz J, Dausmann K, Sommer S, Evol Ecol 2008 22 617 636 10.1007/s10682-007-9186-4
116. Opposites attract: MHC-associated mate choice in a polygynous primate. Setchell JM, Charpentier MJE, Abbott KM, Wickings EJ, Knapp LA, J Evol Biol 2010 23 136 148 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01880.x 19891747
117. Odour signals major histocompatibility complex genotype in an Old World monkey. Setchell JM, Vaglio S, Abbott KM, Moggi-Cecchi J, Boscaro F, Pieraccini G, Knapp LA, Proc Roy Soc B 2011 278 274 280 10.1098/rspb.2010.0571
118. MHC-correlated mate choice in humans: A review. Havlicek J, Roberts SC, Psychoneuroendocrinology 2009 34 497 512 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.007 19054623
119. A cue of kinship promotes cooperation for the public good. Krupp DB, DeBruine LM, Barclay P, Evol Hum Behav 2008 29 49 55 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav. 2007.08.002 (Pubitemid 350215278)
120. Social perception of facial resemblance in humans. DeBruine LM, Jones BC, Little AC, Perrett DI, Arch Sex Behav 2007 37 64 77
121. Facial similarity between voters and candidates causes influence. Bailenson JN, Iyengar S, Yee N, Collins NA, Public Opin Q 2009 72 935 961
122. Trustworthy but not lust-worthy: context-specific effects of facial resemblance. DeBruine LM, Proc Roy Soc B 2005 272 919 922 10.1098/rspb.2004.3003 (Pubitemid 40956759)
123. Facial resemblance and attractiveness: An experimental study in rural indonesia. Nojo S, Ihara Y, Furusawa H, Akamatsu S, Ishida T, Lett Evol Behav Sci 2011 2 9 12