Challenges in continental river dynamics

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 50, Issue , 2013, Pages 16-20

  Hodges, Ben R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Hydraulics; Hydrology; River network; Saint Venant equations

Indexed keywords

1D-DYNAMIC MODELS; CONTINENTAL SCALE; DATA AVAILABILITY; DATA COLLECTION; HYDROLOGY MODELS; RIVER NETWORK; SAINT VENANT EQUATION; SYNTHETIC METHODS;

DYNAMICS; HYDRAULICS; HYDROLOGY;

RIVERS;

DATA ACQUISITION; FLOW MODELING; HYDRAULICS; RIVER BASIN; RIVER FLOW; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84884553695     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.08.010     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Aggett G.R., Wilson J.P. Creating and coupling a high-resolution DTM with a 1-D hydraulic model in a GIS for scenario-based assessment of avulsion hazard in a gravel-bed river. Geomorphology 2009, 113(1-2):21-34.
2. Andreadis K.M., Clark E.A., Lettenmaier D.P., Alsdorf D.E. Prospects for river discharge and depth estimation through assimilation of swath-altimetry into a raster-based hydrodynamics model. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2007, 34(10):5.
3. Beighley R.E., Eggert K.G., Dunne T., He Y., Gummadi V., Verdin K.L. Simulating hydrologic and hydraulic processes throughout the Amazon River Basin. Hydrobiol. Process. 2009, 23(8):1221-1235.
4. Beighley R.E., Gummadi V. Developing channel and floodplain dimensions with limited data: a case study in the Amazon Basin. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2011, 36(8):1059-1071.
5. Beven K.J., Cloke H.L. Comment on "Hyperresolution global land surface modeling: meeting a grand challenge for monitoring Earth's terrestrial water" by Eric F. Wood etal. Water Resour. Res. 2011, 48(W01801):1-3.
6. Castellarin A., Di Baldassarre G., Bates P.D., Brath A. Optimal cross-sectional spacing in Preissmann scheme 1D hydrodynamic models. J.Hydraul. Eng. ASCE 2009, 135(2):96-105.
7. Castronova A.M., Goodall J.L. Simulating watersheds using loosely integrated model components: evaluation of computational scaling using OpenMI. Environ. Model. Softw. 2013, 39:304-313.
8. Chen Y.C., Wang Z.Y., Liu Z.W., Zhu D.J. 1D-2D coupled numerical model for shallow-water flows. J.Hydraul. Eng. ASCE 2012, 138(2):122-132.
9. Collischonn W., Allasia D., Da Silva B.C., Tucci C.E.M. The MGB-IPH model for large-scale rainfall runoff modelling. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2007, 52(5):878-895.
10. Crnkovic B., Crnjaric-Zic N., Kranjcevic L. Improvements of semi-implicit schemes for hyperbolic balance laws applied on open channel flow equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 2009, 58(2):292-309.
11. Croley T.E., He C.S. Distributed-parameter large basin runoff model. I: model development. J.Hydrol. Eng. 2005, 10(3):173-181.
12. Cunge J.A., Holly F.M., Verwey A. Practical Aspects of Computational River Hydraulics 1980, Pitman Publishing Ltd, Boston Mass.
13. David C.H., Gochis D.J., Maidment D.R., Yu W., Yates D.N., Yang Z.L. Using NHDPlus as the land base for the Noah-distributed model. Transactions in GIS 2009, 13(4):363-377.
14. David C.H., Yang Z.-L., Hong S. Regional-scale river flow modeling using off-the-shelf runoff products, thousands of mapped rivers and hundreds of stream flow gauges. Environ. Model. Softw. 2013, 42:116-132.
15. De Doncker L., Troch P., Verhoeven R., Bal K., Meire P., Quintelier J. Determination of the manning roughness coefficient influenced by vegetation in the river Aa and Biebrza River. Environ. Fluid Mech. 2009, 9(5):549-567.
16. Decoene A., Bonaventura L., Miglio E., Saleri F. Asymptotic derivation of the section-averaged shallow water equations for natural river hydraulics. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 2009, 19(3):387-417.
17. Devkota B.H., Imberger J. Lagrangian modeling of the dynamics of river and floodplain flow. J.Hydraul. Eng. ASCE 2009, 135(10):771-782.
18. Ducharne A., Golaz C., Leblois E., Laval K., Polcher J., Ledoux E., De Marsily G. Development of a high resolution runoff routing model, calibration and application to assess runoff from the LMD GCM. J.Hydrol. 2003, 280(1-4):207-228.
19. Fewtrell T.J., Neal J.C., Bates P.D., Harrison P.J. Geometric and structural river channel complexity and the prediction of urban inundation. Hydrobiol. Process. 2011, 25(20):3173-3186.
20. Finaud-Guyot P., Delenne C., Guinot V., Llovel C. 1D-2D coupling for river flow modeling. Comptes Rendus Mec. 2011, 339(4):226-234.
21. Gallegos H.A., Schubert J.E., Sanders B.F. Two-dimensional, high-resolution modeling of urban dam-break flooding: a case study of Baldwin Hills, California. Adv. Water Resour. 2009, 32(8):1323-1335.
22. Gichamo T.Z., Popescu I., Jonoski A., Solomatine D. River cross-section extraction from the ASTER global DEM for flood modeling. Environ. Model. Softw. 2012, 31:37-46.
23. Giustarini L., Matgen P., Hostache R., Montanari M., Plaza D., Pauwels V.R.N., De Lannoy G.J.M., De Keyser R., Pfister L., Hoffmann L., Savenije H.H.G. Assimilating SAR-derived water level data into a hydraulic model: a case study. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2011, 15(7):2349-2365.
24. Goteti G., Famiglietti J.S., Asante K. Acatchment-based hydrologic and routing modeling system with explicit river channels. J.Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2008, 113(D14116):15.
25. Hill C., DeLuca C., Balaji V., Suarez M., da Silva A., Sawyer W., Cruz C., Trayanov A., Zaslavsky L., Hallberg R., Boville B., Craig A., Collins N., Kluzek E., Michalakes J., Neckels D., Schwab E., Smithline S., Wolfe J., Iredell M., Yang W.Y., Jacob R., Larson J. Implementing applications with the earth system modeling framework. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2006, vol. 3732:563-572. Springer.
26. Hodges B.R., Imberger J. Simple curvilinear method for numerical methods of open channels. J.Hydraul. Eng. ASCE 2001, 127(11):949-958.
27. Hohenthal J., Alho P., Hyyppa J., Hyyppa H. Laser scanning applications in fluvial studies. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2011, 35(6):782-809.
28. Hutton C.J., Brazier R.E., Nicholas A.P., Nearing M. On the effects of improved cross-section representation in one-dimensional flow routing models applied to ephemeral rivers. Water Resour. Res. 2012, 48(W04509):1-11.
29. Kim J., Warnock A., Ivanov V.Y., Katopodes N.D. Coupled modeling of hydrologic and hydrodynamic processes including overland and channel flow. Adv. Water Resour. 2012, 37:104-126.
30. King E.A., Paget M.J., Briggs P.R., Trudinger C.M., Raupach M.R. Operational delivery of hydro-meteorological monitoring and modeling over the Australian continent. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 2009, 2(4):241-249.
31. Kuiry S.N., Sen D., Bates P.D. Coupled 1D-quasi-2D flood inundation model with unstructured grids. J.Hydraul. Eng. ASCE 2010, 136(8):493-506.
32. Legleiter C.J. Remote measurement of river morphology via fusion of lidar topography and spectrally based bathymetry. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2012, 37(5):499-518.
33. Legleiter C.J., Kyriakidis P.C., McDonald R.R., Nelson J.M. Effects of uncertain topographic input data on two-dimensional flow modeling in a gravel-bed river. Water Resour. Res. 2011, 47.
34. Leopold L.B., Maddock T.J. The Hydraulic Geometry of Stream Channels and Some Physiographic Implications 1953, (Geological Survey Professional Paper 252), U.S. Government Printing Office.
35. Liu F., Hodges B.R. Applying microprocessor analysis methods to river network modelling. Environ. Model. Softw. 2013, (in press).
36. Lu B., Piasecki M. Community modeling systems: classification and relevance to hydrologic modeling. J.Hydroinf. 2012, 14(4):840-856.
37. Mejia A.I., Reed S.M. Evaluating the effects of parameterized cross section shapes and simplified routing with a coupled distributed hydrologic and hydraulic model. J.Hydrol. 2011, 409(1-2):512-524.
38. Mejia A.I., Reed S.M. Role of channel and floodplain cross-section geometry in the basin response. Water Resour. Res. 2011, 47.
39. Nijssen B., Lettenmaier D.P., Liang X., Wetzel S.W., Wood E.F. Streamflow simulation for continental-scale river basins. Water Resour. Res. 1997, 33(4):711-724.
40. Niu G., Yang Z.-L., Mitchell K.E., Chen F., Ek M.B., Barlange M., Kumar A., Manning K., Niyogi D., Rosero E., Tewari M., Xia Y. The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements. J.Geophys. Res. 2011, 116(D12109):19.
41. Overton I.C. Modelling floodplain inundation on a regulated river: integrating GIS, remote sensing and hydrological models. River Res. Appl. 2005, 21(9):991-1001.
42. Paiva R.C.D., Collischonn W., Costa Buarque D. Validation of a full hydrodynamic model for large-scale hydrologic modelling in the Amazon. Hydrobiol. Process. 2013, 27(3):333-346.
43. Paiva R.C.D., Collischonn W., Tucci C.E.M. Large scale hydrologic and hydrodynamic modeling using limited data and a GIS based approach. J.Hydrol. 2011, 406(3-4):170-181.
44. Passalacqua P., Belmont P., Foufoula-Georgiou E. Automatic geomorphic feature extraction from lidar in flat and engineered landscapes. Water Resour. Res. 2012, 48(W03528):1-18.
45. Plant W.J., Branch R., Chatham G., Chickadel C.C., Hayes K., Hayworth B., Horner-Devine A., Jessup A., Fong D.A., Fringer O.B., Giddings S.N., Monismith S., Wang B. Remotely sensed river surface features compared with modeling and in situ measurements. J.Geophys. Res. Oceans 2009, 114(C11002):1-13.
46. Pramanik N., Panda R.K., Sen D. One dimensional hydrodynamic modeling of river flow using DEM extracted river cross-sections. Water Resour. Manag. 2010, 24(5):835-852.
47. Rosatti G., Bonaventura L., Deponti A., Garegnani G. An accurate and efficient semi-implicit method for section-averaged free-surface flow modelling. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 2011, 65(4):448-473.
48. Trigg M.A., Wilson M.D., Bates P.D., Horritt M.S., Alsdorf D.E., Forsberg B.R., Vega M.C. Amazon flood wave hydraulics. J.Hydrol. 2009, 374(1-2):92-105.
49. Tsai C.W. Applicability of kinematic, noninertia, and quasi-steady dynamic wave models to unsteady flow routing. J.Hydraul. Eng. ASCE 2003, 129(8):613-627.
50. Vidal J.-P., Moisan S., Faure J.-B., Dartus D. River model calibration, from guidelines to operational support tools. Environ. Model. Softw. 2007, 22(11):1628-1640.
51. Vieira J.H.D. Conditions governing the use of approximations for the Saint-Venant equations for shallow surface-water flow. J.Hydrol. 1983, 60(1-4):43-58.
52. Wood E.F., Roundy J.K., Troy T.J., van Beek L.P.H., Bierkens M.F.P., Blyth E., de Roo A., Doll P., Ek M., Famiglietti J., Gochis D., van de Giesen N., Houser P., Jaffe P.R., Kollet S., Lehner B., Lettenmaier D.P., Peters-Lidard C., Sivapalan M., Sheffield J., Wade A., Whitehead P. Hyperresolution global land surface modeling: meeting a grand challenge for monitoring Earth's terrestrial water. Water Resour. Res. 2011, 47(W05301):1-10.
53. Wu W.M., Vieira D.A., Wang S.S.Y. One-dimensional numerical model for nonuniform sediment transport under unsteady flows in channel networks. J.Hydraul. Eng. ASCE 2004, 130(9):914-923.
54. Zhu D.J., Chen Y.C., Wang Z.Y., Liu Z.W. Simple, robust, and efficient algorithm for gradually varied subcritical flow simulation in general channel networks. J.Hydraul. Eng. ASCE 2011, 137(7):766-774.