River cross-section extraction from the ASTER global DEM for flood modeling

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 31, Issue , 2012, Pages 37-46

  Gichamo, T Z ^a   Popescu, I ^a   Jonoski, A ^a   Solomatine, D ^a,b  

^a UNESCO IHE INSTITUTE FOR WATER EDUCATION   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

ASTER GDEM; HEC RAS GeoRAS; Optimization; River cross sections; Tisza River

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED SPACEBORNE THERMAL EMISSION AND REFLECTION RADIOMETER; ASTER GDEM; BIAS CORRECTION; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; FLOOD MODELING; FLOW ROUTING; GLOBAL DATA; GLOBAL DEM; HEC-RAS; HEC-RAS/GEORAS; HUNGARY; LOW RESOLUTION; MODEL RESULTS; MODELING TOOL; OPTIMIZATION ROUTINE; PRE-PROCESSING; RIVER SECTION; TERRAIN MODEL; TISZA RIVER; TOPOGRAPHIC DATA; VERTICAL ACCURACY;

OPTIMIZATION; SURVEYING;

RIVERS;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ASTER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; FLOODING; OPTIMIZATION; TERRAIN; TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING;

HUNGARY; TISZA RIVER;

EID: 84856399066     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. ASTER GDEM Validation Team, 2009. ASTER Global DEM Validation Summary Report. METI/ERSDAC, NASA/LPDAAC, USGS/EROS.
2. Ackerman C.T. HEC-GeoRAS GIS Tools for Support of HEC-RAS Using ArcGIS User's Manual Version 4.2 2009, US Army Corps of Engineers Institute for Water Resources Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC).
3. Asante K., Arlan G., Pervez S., Rowland J. Alinear geospatial streamflow modeling system for data sparse environments. International Journal of River Basin Management 2008, 6(3):233-241.
4. Bálint Z., Tóth S. Flood protection in the Tisza river basin. Flood Risk Management: Hazards, Vulnerability and Mitigation Measures 2006, 185-197. Springer. J. Schanze, E. Zeman, J. Marsalek (Eds.).
5. Bakonyi, P., 2009. Pilot study of the " Tisza River Basin" Executive Summary, FLOODsite Report Number T22-08-01. KöTIKöVIZIG Kht.
6. Brunner G. HEC-RAS River Analysis System User's Manual Version 4.0, Report CPD-68 2008, US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA.
7. Castellarin A., Di Baldassarre G., Bates P., Brath A. Optimal cross-sectional spacing in Preissmann scheme 1D hydrodynamic models. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 2009, 135(2):96-105.
8. Cunge J. On the subject of a flood propagation computation method (Musklngum method). Journal of Hydraulic Research 1969, 7(2):205-230.
9. Fenton, J., 2010. Accuracy of Muskingum-Cunge Flood Routing.
10. Fenton J., Keller R. The Calculation of Streamflow from Measurements of Stage 2001, Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology.
11. Hengl T., Heuvelink G., Van Loon E. On the uncertainty of stream networks derived from elevation data: the error propagation approach. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 2010, 14(7):1153-1165.
12. Herath S., Dutta D., Wijesekera S. Acoupled river and inundation modeling scheme for efficient flood forecasting. Geoinformatics 2003, 14(1):37-41.
13. Honnorat M., Lai X., Monnier J., Le Dimet F. Variational Data Assimilation for 2D Fluvial Hydraulics Simulations 2006, CMWR XVI - Computational Methods in Water Resources XVI International Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark.
14. Honnorat M., Monnier J., Le Dimet F. Lagrangian data assimilation for river hydraulics simulations. Computing and Visualization in Science 2009, 12(5):235-246.
15. Knight D. River flood hydraulics: validation issues in one-dimensional flood routing models. River Basin Modelling for Flood Risk Mitigation 2006, 335-385. Taylor and Francis, Leiden, Netherlands. D. Knight, A. Shamseldin (Eds.).
16. Kovács S., Kiss A., Szekeres J. Experiences in application of HEC-RAS model under circumstances of flood waves. Flood Risk Management: Hazards, Vulnerability and Mitigation Measures 2006, 47-58. J. Schanze, E. Zeman, J. Marsalek (Eds.).
17. Liu X. Airborne LiDAR for DEM generation: some critical issues. Progress in Physical Geography 2008, 32(1):31.
18. Mandlburger G., Hauer C., Höfle B., Habersack H., Pfeifer N. Optimisation of LiDAR derived terrain models for river flow modelling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 2009, 13(8):1453-1466.
19. Merwade V., Maidment D., Hodges B. Geospatial representation of river channels. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 10 2005, 243.
20. Merwade V., Cook A., Coonrod J. GIS techniques for creating river terrain models for hydrodynamic modeling and flood inundation mapping. Environmental Modelling & Software 2008, 23(10-11):1300-1311.
21. Pramanik N., Panda R., Sen D. One dimensional hydrodynamic modeling of river flow using DEM extracted river cross-sections. Water Resources Management 2010, 24(5):835-852.
22. Price W. Global optimization by controlled random search. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 1983, 40(3):333-348.
23. Price R. An optimized routing model for flood forecasting. Water Resources Research 2009, 45(2):W02426.
24. Price R. Volume-conservative nonlinear flood routing. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 2009, 135(10):838-845.
25. Qi H., Altinakar M.S. AGIS-based decision support system for integrated flood management under uncertainty with two dimensional numerical simulations. Environmental Modelling & Software 2011, 26(6):817-821.
26. Roux, H., Dartus, D., 2004. Data Assimilation Applied to Hydraulic Parameter Identification, British Hydrological Society International Conference 2004, Hydrology: Science and Practice for the 21st Century. London, United Kingdom, pp. 354-361.
27. Roux H., Dartus D. Sensitivity analysis and predictive uncertainty using inundation observations for parameter estimation in open-channel inverse problem. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 2008, 134(5):541-549.
28. Samuels P. Cross section location in one-dimensional models. International Conference on River Flood Hydraulics 1990, 339-350. Wily, Chichester, UK. W.R. White (Ed.).
29. Sanders B. Evaluation of on-line DEMs for flood inundation modeling. Advances in Water Resources 2007, 30(8):1831-1843.
30. Schwanghart W., Kuhn N.J. TopoToolbox: a set of Matlab functions for topographic analysis. Environmental Modelling & Software 2010, 25(6):770-781.
31. Solomatine D. The Use of Global Random Search Methods for Models Calibration 1995, XXVIth Congress of the International Association for Hydraulic Research (IAHR), London, UK, pp. 224-229.
32. Solomatine D. Two strategies of adaptive cluster covering with descent and their comparison to other algorithms. Journal of Global Optimization 1999, 14(1):55-78.
33. Tóth, S., Kovács, S., 2007. River capacity improvement and partial floodplain reactivation along the Middle-Tisza: scenario analysis of intervention options, FLOODsite Report Number T22-07-01. HEURAqua/KöTIKöVIZIG.
34. Tesfa T.K., Tarboton D.G., Watson D.W., Schreuders K.A.T., Baker M.E., Wallace R.M. Extraction of hydrological proximity measures from DEMs using parallel processing. Environmental Modelling & Software 2011, 26(12):1696-1709.
35. Vaze J., Teng J., Spencer G. Impact of DEM accuracy and resolution on topographic indices. Environmental Modelling & Software 2010, 25(10):1086-1098.