Coupled modeling of hydrologic and hydrodynamic processes including overland and channel flow

Advances in Water Resources

Volumn 37, Issue , 2012, Pages 104-126

  Kim, Jongho ^a   Warnock, April ^a   Ivanov, Valeriy Y ^a   Katopodes, Nikolaos D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Hydrodynamic model; Overland flow; Physically based hydrologic model; Rainfall runoff; Sheet flow approximation; Streamflow

Indexed keywords

HYDRODYNAMIC MODEL; OVERLAND FLOW; PHYSICALLY-BASED HYDROLOGIC MODEL; RAINFALL RUNOFF; SHEET FLOW APPROXIMATION;

HYDRODYNAMICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL METHODS; RUNOFF; STREAM FLOW; WATERSHEDS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; CHANNEL FLOW; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COUPLING; GEOMETRY; HYDRODYNAMICS; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; MICROTOPOGRAPHY; NUMERICAL MODEL; OVERLAND FLOW; RAINFALL; RUNOFF; TRIANGULATED IRREGULAR NETWORK;

EID: 84855274934     PISSN: 03091708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Abbott M.B. Continuous flows, discontinuous flows and numerical analysis. J Hydraul Res 1974, 12(4):417-467.
2. Akanbi A.A., Katopodes N.D. Model for flood propapation on initially dry land. J Hydraul Eng - ASCE 1988, 114(7):689-706.
3. Alonso R., Santillana M., Dawson C. On the diffusive wave approximation of the shallow water equations. Eur J Appl Math 2008, 19:575-606.
4. Anderson J.D. Computational fluid dynamics 1995, McGraw-Hill, New York.
5. Begnudelli L., Sanders B.F. Unstructured grid finite-volume algorithm for shallow-water flow and scalar transport with wetting and drying. J Hydraul Eng - ASCE 2006, 132(4):371-384.
6. Begnudelli L., Sanders B.F. Simulation of the St. Francis dam-break flood. J Eng Mech - ASCE 2007, 133(11):1200-1212.
7. Bixio A.C., Putti M., Orlandini S., Paniconi C. Physically-based distributed model for coupled surface runoff and subsurface flow simulation at the catchment scale. Comput Methods Water Resour 2000, 1115-1122.
8. Bradford S.F., Katopodes N.D. Hydrodynamics of turbid underflows. I: Formulation and numerical analysis. J Hydraul Eng - ASCE 1999, 125(10):1006-1015.
9. Bradford S.F., Katopodes N.D. Finite volume model for nonlevel basin irrigation. J Irrig Drain Eng - ASCE 2001, 127(4):216-223.
10. Bradford S.F., Sanders B.F. Finite-volume model for shallow-water flooding of arbitrary topography. J Hydraul Eng - ASCE 2002, 128(3):289-298.
11. Bras R.L. Hydrology: an introduction to hydrologic science 1990, Addison-Wesley/Longman, Reading, MA/London.
12. Brufau P., Garcia-Navarro P. Unsteady free surface flow simulation over complex topography with a multidimensional upwind technique. J Comput Phys 2003, 186:503-526.
13. Brufau P., Garcia-Navarro P., Vazquez-Cendon M.E. Zero mass error using unsteady wetting-drying conditions in shallow flows over dry irregular topography. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 2004, 45:1047-1082.
14. Cabral M.C., Garrote L., Bras R.L., Entekhabi D. A kinematic model of infiltration and runoff generation in layered and sloped soils. Adv Water Resour 1992, 15:311-324.
15. Camporese M., Paniconi C., Putti M., Orlandini S. Surface-subsurface flow modeling with path-based runoff routing, boundary condition-based coupling, and assimilation of multisource observation data. Water Resour Res 2010, 46:W02512. 10.1029/2008WR007536.
16. Chen X., Wu J., Hu Q. Simulation of climate change impacts on streamflow in the Bosten lake basin using an artificial neural network model. J Hydrol Eng - ASCE 2008, 13(3):180-183.
17. Dankers R., Feyen L. Climate change impact on flood hazard in Europe: an assessment based on high-resolution climate simulations. J Geophys Res - Atmospheres 2008, 113(D19).
18. De Roo A.P.J., Hazelhoff L., Burrough P.A. Soil erosion modelling using 'ANSWERS' and geographical information systems. Earth Surface Process Landforms 1989, 14:517-532.
19. Di Giammarco P., Todini E., Lamberti P. A conservative finite elements approach to overland flow: the control volume finite element formulation. J Hydrol 1996, 175(1-4):267-291.
20. Downer C.W., Ogden F.L. GSSHA: model to simulate diverse stream flow producing processes. J Hydrol Eng - ASCE 2004, 9(3):161-174.
21. Du J., Xie S., Xu Y., Xu C.Y., Singh V.P. Development and testing of a simple physically-based distributed rainfall-runoff model for storm runoff simulation in humid forested basins. J Hydrol 2007, 336(3-4):334-346.
22. Dunne T., Black R.D. An experimental investigation of runoff production in permeable soils. Water Resour Res 1970, 6(2):478-490.
23. Entekhabi D. Land surface processes: basic tools and concepts 2000, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
24. Goderniaux P., Brouyere S., Fowler H.J., Blenkinsop S., Therrien R., Orban P., et al. Large scale surface-subsurface hydrological model to assess climate change impacts on groundwater reserves. J Hydrol 2009, 373:122-138.
25. Gottardi G., Venutelli M. An accurate time integration method for simplified overland flow models. Adv Water Resour 2008, 31(1):173-180.
26. Govindaraju R.S., Kavvas M.L., Jones S.E. Approximate analytical solutions for overland flows. Water Resour Res 1990, 26(12):2903-2912.
27. HEC. HEC-1 flood hydrograph package user's manual version 41. US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center; 1998.
28. Hillel D. Fundamentals of soil physics 1980, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.
29. Hirsch C. Numerical computation of internal and external flows 1990, vol. 2. Wiley.
30. Horritt M.S. Evaluating wetting and drying algorithms for finite element models of shallow water flow. Int J Numer Methods Eng 2002, 55(7):835-851.
31. Horton R.E. The role of infiltration in the hydrological cycle. Trans Am Geophys Union 1933, 14:446-460.
32. Howes D.A., Abrahams A.D., Pitman E.B. One- and two-dimensional modelling of overland flow in semiarid shrubland, Jornada basin, New Mexico. Hydrol Process 2006, 20(5):1027-1046.
33. Hromadka T.V., Berenbrock C.E., Freckleton J.R., Guymon G.L. A two-dimensional dam-break flood-plain model. Adv Water Resour 1985, 8(1):7-14.
34. Hromadka T.V., Nestlinger A.J. Technical note - estimating water shed S-graphs using a diffusion flow model. Adv Water Resour 1985, 8(4):214-218.
35. Hu Z., Islam S. Prediction of ground surface temperature and soil moisture content by the force-restore method. Water Resour Res 1995, 31(10):2531-2539.
36. Huang J.K., Lee K.T. Influences of spatially heterogeneous roughness on flow hydrographs. Adv Water Resour 2009, 32(11):1580-1587.
37. Hunter N.M., Bates P.D., Horritt M.S., Wilson M.D. Simple spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation: a review. Geomorphology 2007, 90(3-4):208-225.
38. Hursh C.R., Brater E.F. Separating storm-hydrographs from small drainage-areas into surface and subsurface flow. Trans Am Geophys Union 1941, 22:863-870.
39. Ivanov V.Y., Vivoni E.R., Bras R.L., Entekhabi D. Catchment hydrologic response with a fully distributed triangulated irregular network model. Water Resour Res 2004, 40(11):W11102. p. 23.
40. Ivanov V.Y., Vivoni E.R., Bras R.L., Entekhabi D. Preserving high-resolution surface and rainfall data in operational-scale basin hydrology: a fully-distributed physically-based approach. J Hydrol 2004, 298(1-4):80-111.
41. Johanson RC, Imhoff JC, Davis HH. Users manual for the hydrologic simulation program-Fortran (HSPF) version No. 5.0. EPA-600/9-80-105. Athens, GA: US EPA Environmental Research Laboratory; 1980.
42. Jones J.P., Sudicky E.A., McLaren R.G. Application of a fully-integrated surface-subsurface flow model at the watershed-scale: a case study. Water Resour Res 2008, 44:W03407. 10.1029/2006WR005603.
43. Katopodes N.D. On zero inertia and kinematic waves. J Hydraul Eng - ASCE 1982, 108:1380-1387.
44. Katopodes ND, Bradford, SF. Mechanics of overland flow. In: International workshop on numerical modeling of hydrodynamic systems, Zaragoza, Spain. p. 1-23.
45. Kawahara M., Yokoyama T. Finite element method for direct runoff flow. J Hydraul Div - ASCE 1980, 106(4):519-534.
46. Kay A.L., Davies H.N., Bell V.A., Jones R.G. Comparison of uncertainty sources for climate change impacts: flood frequency in England. Climatic Change 2009, 92(1-2):41-63.
47. Keskin M.E., Agiralioglu N. A simplified dynamic model for flood routing in rectangular channels. J Hydrol 1997, 202(1-4):302-314.
48. Kollet S.J., Maxwell R.M. Integrated surface-groundwater flow modeling: a free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel groundwater flow model. Adv Water Resour 2006, 29(7):945-958.
49. Leendertse JJ. Aspects of a computational model for long-period water wave propagation. Memorandum RM-5294-PR. Santa Monica, California: The Rand Corporation; 1967.
50. Li L., Xu H., Chen X., Simonovic S.P. Streamflow forecast and reservoir operation performance assessment under climate change. Water Resour Manage 2010, 24(1):83-104.
51. Liggett J.A. Mathematical flow determination in open channels. J Eng Mech Div - ASCE 1968, 94(EM4):947-963.
52. Lin J.D. On the force-restore method for prediction of ground surface temperature. J Geophys Res 1980, 85(C6):3251-3254.
53. Loague K., Heppner C.S., Ebel B.A., VanderKwaak J.E. The quixotic search for a comprehensive understanding of hydrologic response at the surface: Horton, Dunne, Dunton, and the role of concept-development simulation. Hydrol Process 2010, 24:2499-2505.
54. Makkeasorn A., Chang N.B., Zhou X. Short-term streamflow forecasting with global climate change implications - a comparative study between genetic programming and neural network models. J Hydrol 2008, 352(3-4):336-354.
55. Mantua N., Tohver I., Hamlet A. Climate change impacts on streamflow extremes and summertime stream temperature and their possible consequences for freshwater salmon habitat in Washington State. Climatic Change 2010, 102(1-2):187-223.
56. Monteith J.L. Evaporation and environment. Sym Soc Exp Biol 1965, 19:205-234.
57. Moramarco T., Singh V.P. A practical method for analysis of river waves and for kinematic wave routing in natural channel networks. Hydrol Process 2000, 14(1):51-62.
58. Morgan R.P.C., Quinton J.N., Smith R.E., Govers G., Poesen J.W.A., Auerswald K., et al. The European Soil Erosion Model (EUROSEM): a dynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments. Earth Surface Process Landforms 1998, 23(6):527-544.
59. Moriasi D.N., Arnold J.G., Van Liew M.W., Bingner R.L., Harmel R.D., Veith T.L. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 2007, 50(3):885-900.
60. Morita M., Yen B.C. Modeling of conjunctive two-dimensional surface-three-dimensional subsurface flows. J Hydraul Eng - ASCE 2002, 128(2):184-200.
61. Morris E.M., Woolhiser D.A. Unsteady one-dimensional flow over a plane - partial equilibrium and recession hydrographs. Water Resour Res 1980, 16(2):355-360.
62. Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I: A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 1970, 10(3):282-290.
63. Odai S.N. Nonlinear kinematic-wave model for predicting open-channel flow rate. J Hydraul Eng - ASCE 1999, 125(8):886-889.
64. Orlandini S., Rosso R. Parameterization of stream channel geometry in the distributed modeling of catchment dynamics. Water Resour Res 1998, 34(8):1971-1985.
65. Panday S., Huyakorn P.S. A fully coupled physically-based spatially-distributed model for evaluating surface/subsurface flow. Adv Water Resour 2004, 27(4):361-382.
66. Parlange J.Y., Rose C.W., Sander G. Kinematic flow approximation of runoff on a plane - an exact analytical solution. J Hydrol 1981, 52(1-2):171-176.
67. Penman H.L. Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proc Soc Lond Ser 1948, A193:120-145.
68. Prestininzi P. Suitability of the diffusive model for dam break simulation: application to a CADAM experiment. J Hydrol 2008, 361(1-2):172-185.
69. Rihani J.F., Maxwell R.M., Chow F.K. Coupling groundwater and land surface processes: idealized simulations to identify effects of terrain and subsurface heterogeneity on land surface energy fluxes. Water Resour Res 2010, 46:W12523. 10.1029/2010WR009111.
70. Rinehart A.J., Vivoni E.R., Brooks P.D. Effects of vegetation, albedo, and solar radiation sheltering on the distribution of snow in the Valles Caldera, New Mexico. Ecohydrology 2008, 1:253-270.
71. Roe P.L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference-schemes. J Comput Phys 1981, 43(2):357-372.
72. Rutter A.J., Kershaw K.A., Robins P.C., Morton A.J. A predictive model of rainfall interception in forests. 1: Derivation of the model from observation in a plantation of Corsican pine. Agr Meteorol 1971, 9:367-384.
73. Rutter A.J., Morton A.J., Robins P.C. A predictive model of interception in forests. 2: Generalization of the model and comparison with observations in some coniferous and hardwood stands. J Appl Ecol 1975, 12:367-380.
74. Sanders B.F. Integration of a shallow water model with a local time step. J Hydraul Res 2008, 46(4):466-475.
75. Schreiber D.L., Bender D.L. Obtaining overland flow resistance by optimization. J Hydraul Div - ASCE 1972, 98(3):429-446.
76. Shen C., Phanikumar M.S. A process-based, distributed hydrologic model based on a large-scale method for surface-subsurface coupling. Adv Water Resour 2010, 33:1524-1541.
77. Smith M, Koren V, Reed S, Zhang Z, Seo DJ, Moreda F, et al. The distributed model intercomparison project: Phase 2, science plan; 2006. http://www.weather.gov/oh/hrl/dmip/2/science_plan.html.
78. Smith M.B., Seo D.J., Koren V.I., Reed S.M., Zhang Z., Duan Q., et al. The distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP): motivation and experiment design. J Hydrol 2004, 298(1-4):4-26.
79. Sulis M., Meyerhoff S.B., Paniconi C., Maxwell R.M., Putti M., Kollet S.J. A comparison of two physics-based numerical models for simulating surface water-groundwater interactions. Adv Water Resour 2010, 33(4):456-467.
80. Sulis M., Paniconi C., Camporese M. Impact of grid resolution on the integrated and distributed response of a coupled surface-subsurface hydrological model for the des Anglais catchment, Quebec. Hydrol Process 2011, 25:1853-1865.
81. Titov V.V., Synolakis C.E. Modeling of breaking, and nonbreaking long-wave evolution and runup using VTCS-2. J Waterway Port Coast Ocean Eng - ASCE 1995, 121(6):308-316.
82. Toro E.F. Shock-capturing methods for free-surface shallow flows 2001, John Wiley and Sons.
83. Tsai T.L., Yang J.C. Kinematic wave modeling of overland flow using characteristics method with cubic-spline interpolation. Adv Water Resour 2005, 28(7):661-670.
84. VanderKwaak J.E., Loague K. Hydrologic-response simulations for the R-5 catchment with a comprehensive physics-based model. Water Resour Res 2001, 37(4):999-1013.
85. Wang G.T., Chen S.L., Jan B., Stockle C.O., McCool D.K. Modelling overland flow based on Saint-Venant equations for a discretized hillslope system. Hydrol Process 2002, 16(12):2409-2421.
86. Weyman D.R. Throughflow on hillslopes and its relation to the stream hydrograph. Bull Int Assoc Sci Hydrol 1970, 15:25-33.
87. Xia J., Falconer R.A., Lin B., Tan G. Modelling flood routing on initially dry beds with refined treatment of wetting and drying. Int J River Basin Manage 2010, 8(3-4):225-243.
88. Yu D., Lane S.N. Urban fluvial flood modelling using a two-dimensional diffusion-wave treatment. Part 1: Mesh resolution effects. Hydrol Process 2006, 20(7):1541-1565.
89. Zokagoa J., Soulaimani A. Modeling of wetting-drying transitions in free surface flows over complex topographies. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2010, 199:2281-2304.