Evaluating the effects of parameterized cross section shapes and simplified routing with a coupled distributed hydrologic and hydraulic model

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 409, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 512-524

  Mejia, A I ^a   Reed, S M ^a  

^a NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cross section geometry; Distributed model; Routing

Indexed keywords

CHANNEL CROSS SECTION; CHANNEL POWER; CROSS SECTION; CROSS SECTION DATA; CROSS SECTION SHAPE; CROSS-SECTION GEOMETRY; DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGIC MODEL; DISTRIBUTED MODELS; FLOOD PLAINS; HEC-RAS; HYDROGRAPHS; HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC MODELS; HYPOTHESIS TESTS; ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN; KEY FACTORS; KINEMATIC WAVES; MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE; MODEL PERFORMANCE; MODELING FRAMEWORKS; OKLAHOMA; PARAMETERIZED; POWER LAW; PREDICTIVE UNCERTAINTY; QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENTS; RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION; ROUGHNESS PARAMETERS; ROUTING; SCENARIO SIMULATIONS; SPLIT SAMPLING; STREAM NETWORKS; UNSTEADY HYDRAULICS;

HYDRAULIC MODELS; HYDRAULIC STRUCTURES; RATING; RIVERS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

PARAMETERIZATION;

CROSS SECTION; FLOODPLAIN; GEOMETRY; HYDRAULICS; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; ONE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; PARAMETERIZATION; POWER LAW; RESOURCE USE; ROUGHNESS; ROUTING; SAMPLING; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

BLUE BASIN; ILLINOIS BASIN; OKLAHOMA [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 80054055201     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.08.050     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Brunner, G.W., 2008a. HEC-RAS, River Analysis System Hydraulic Reference Manual. US Army Corps of Engineers. Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, 411pp.
2. Brunner, G.W., 2008b. HEC-RAS, River Analysis System User's Manual. US Army Corps of Engineers. Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, 733pp.
3. Butts M.B., Payne J.T., Kristensen M., Madsen H. An evaluation of the impact of model structure on hydrological modelling uncertainty for streamflow simulation. Journal of Hydrology 2004, 298(1-4):242-266.
4. Camporese M., Paniconi C., Putti M., Orlandini S. Surface-subsurface flow modeling with pathbased runoff routing, boundary condition-based coupling, and assimilation of multisource observation data. Water Resources Research 2010, 46(2):W02512.
5. Carpenter T.M., Georgakakos K.P. Discretization scale dependencies of the ensemble flow range versus catchment area relationship in distributed hydrologic modeling. Journal of Hydrology 2006, 328(1-2):242-257.
6. Cook A., Merwade V. Effect of topographic data, geometric configuration and modeling approach on flood inundation mapping. Journal of Hydrology 2009, 377(1-2):131-142.
7. Dodov B., Foufoula-Georgiou E. Fluvial processes and streamflow variability: interplay in the scale-frequency continuum and implications for scaling. Water Resources Research 2005, 41:W05005.
8. Fread, D.L., 1981. In: Flood Routing: A Synopsis of Past, Present, and Future Capability, Proceedings, International Symposium on Rainfall-Runoff Modeling, Mississippi State University, Mississippi, pp. 521-541.
9. Fread D.L. Flow routing, in Handbook of Hydrology 1993, 10.1-10.36. McGraw-Hill, New York, (Chapter 10). D.R. Maidment (Ed.).
10. Fread, D.L., Lewis, J.M., 1986. In: Parameter Optimization for Dynamic Flood-Routing Applications with Minimal Cross-Sectional Data, Presented at and Published in the Proceedings of ASCE Water Forum '86 World Water Issues in Evolution, Long Beach, California.
11. Garbrecht J. Analytical representation of cross-section hydraulic properties. Journal of Hydrology 1990, 119:43-56.
12. Henderson F.M. Open Channel Flow 1966, Prentice Hall, New York, 522pp.
13. Horritt M.S., Bates P.D. Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation. Journal of Hydrology 2002, 268(1-4):87-99.
14. Keefer T. Comparison of linear systems and finite difference flow-routing techniques. Water Resources Research 1976, 12(5):997-1006.
15. Kelly K.S., Krzysztofowicz R. A bivariate meta-Gaussian density for use in hydrology. Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics 1997, 11:17-31.
16. Knight D.W. River flood hydraulics: validation issues in one-dimensional flood routing models. River Basin Modelling for Flood Risk Mitigation 2006, 335-385. Taylor and Francis, Leiden, Netherlands, (Chapter 18). D.W. Knight, A.Y. Shamseldin (Eds.).
17. Koren V., Reed S., Smith M., Zhang Z., Seo D.-J. Hydrology laboratory research modeling system (HL-RMS) of the US national weather service. Journal of Hydrology 2004, 291(3-4):297-318.
18. Koren V., Smith M., Duan Q. Use of a-priori parameter estimates in the derivation of spatially consistent parameter sets of rainfall-runoff models. Calibration of Watershed Models, Water Science and Application 2003, vol. 6:239-254. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC.
19. Kuzmin V., Seo D.-J., Koren V. Fast and efficient optimization of hydrologic model parameters using a priori estimates and stepwise line search. Journal of Hydrology 2008, 353(1-2):109-128.
20. Leopold, L.B., Maddock, T., 1953. The Hydraulic Geometry of Stream Channels and Some Physiographic Implications. US Geological Survey Prof. Paper 252, USGS, Washington, DC, 56pp.
21. Lian Y., Chan I-C., Singh J., Demissie M., Knapp V., Xie H. Coupling of hydrologic and hydraulic models for the Illinois River Basin. Journal of Hydrology 2007, 344(3-4):210-222.
22. Lin Z., Beck M.B. On the identification of model structure in hydrological and environmental systems. Water Resources Research 2007, 43:W02402.
23. McCuen R., Knight Z., Cutter A.G. Evaluation of the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency index. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 2006, 11(6):597-602.
24. McCuen R., Snyder W. A proposed index for comparing hydrographs. Water Resources Research 1975, 11(6):1021-1024.
25. Myers W.R.C. Influence of geometry on discharge capacity of open channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 1991, 117(5):676-680.
26. Montanari A., Brath A. A stochastic approach for assessing the uncertainty of rainfall-runoff simulations. Water Resources Research 2004, 40:W01106.
27. Moreda, F., Gutierrez, A., Reed, S., Aschwanden, C., 2009. Transitioning NWS operational hydraulics models from FLDWAV to HEC-RAS. In: ASCE Conf. Proc. 342, 292, 11pp.
28. Nardi F., Vivoni E.R., Grimaldi S. Investigating a floodplain scaling relation using a hydrogeomorphic delineation method. Water Resources Research 2006, 42:W09409.
29. Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models 1: a discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 1970, 10(3):282-290.
30. Pappenberger F., Beven K., Horritt M., Blazkova S. Uncertainty in the calibration of effective roughness parameters in HEC-RAS using inundation and downstream level observations. Journal of Hydrology 2005, 302(1-4):46-69.
31. Orlandini S., Rosso R. Diffusion wave modeling of distributed catchment dynamics. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 1996, 1(3):103-113.
32. Orlandini S., Rosso R. Parameterization of stream channel geometry in the distributed modeling of catchment dynamics. Water Resources Research 1998, 34(8):1971-1985.
33. Orlandini S. On the spatial variation of resistance to flow in upland channel networks. Water Resources Research 2002, 38(10):1197.
34. Ponce V.M., Porras P.J. Effect of cross-sectional shape on free-surface instability. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 1995, 121(4):376-380.
35. Reed S.M. Deriving flow directions for coarse-resolution (1-4km) gridded hydrologic modeling. Water Resources Research 2003, 39(9):1238.
36. Reed S., Koren V., Smith M., Zhang Z., Moreda F., Seo D.-J., DMIP Participants Overall distributed model intercomparison project results. Journal of Hydrology 2004, 298(1-4):27-60.
37. Reichert P., Mieleitner J. Analyzing input and structural uncertainty of nonlinear dynamic models with stochastic, time-dependent parameters. Water Resources Research 2009, 45:W10402.
38. Romanowicz R., Beven K.J. Estimation of flood inundation probabilities as conditioned on event inundation maps. Water Resources Research 2003, 39(3):1073.
39. Singh V.P. Kinematic Wave Modeling in Water Resources, Surface-Water Hydrology 1996, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1424pp.
40. Singh A.K., Porey P.D., Raju K.G.R. Criterion for location of downstream control for dynamic flood routing. Journal of Hydrology 1997, 196(1-4):66-75.
41. Sivapalan M., Blöschl G., Zhang L., Vertessy R. Downward approach to hydrological prediction. Hydrological Processes 2003, 17(11):2101-2111.
42. Smith, M.B., Koren, V., Zhang, Z., Cui, Z., 2009. Distributed hydrologic modeling: from research to operational forecasting. In: ASCE Conf. Proc. 342, 621.
43. Smith M.B., Koren V.I., Zhang Z., Reed S.M., Pan J.-J., Moreda F. Runoff response to spatial variability in precipitation: an analysis of observed data. Journal of Hydrology 2004, 298(1-4):267-286.
44. Smith M.B., Seo D.-J., Koren V.I., Reed S.M., Zhang Z., Duan Q., Moreda F., Cong S. The distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP): motivation and experiment design. Journal of Hydrology 2004, 298(1-4):4-26.
45. Valiani A., Caleffi V. Analytical findings for power law cross-sections: uniform flow depth. Advances in Water Resources 2009, 32(9):1404-1412.
46. Zhang Z., Koren V., Smith M., Reed S., Wang D. Use of next generation weather radar data and basin disaggregation to improve continuous hydrograph simulations. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 2004, 9(103):103-115.