Adaptive molecular networks controlling chemotactic migration: Dynamic inputs and selection of the network architecture

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 368, Issue 1629, 2013, Pages

  Chang, Hao ^a   Levchenko, Andre ^a  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

Chemotaxis; Model; Perfect adaptation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; CELL ORGANELLE; CHEMOTAXIS; EUKARYOTE; SELECTION;

ADAPTATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL MOTION; CELL POLARITY; CHEMOTAXIS; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; MODEL; PERFECT ADAPTATION; REVIEW;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL POLARITY; CHEMOTAXIS; FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

CHEMOTAXIS; MODEL; PERFECT ADAPTATION;

EID: 84884470368     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0117     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Berg HC, Brown DA. 1972 Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking. Nature 239, 500-504. (doi:10.1038/239500a0)
2. Macnab RM, Koshl Jr DE. 1972 The gradient-sensing mechanism in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 69, 2509-2512. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 69.9.2509)
3. Dinauer MC, Steck TL, Devreotes PN. 1980 Cyclic 3′,5′-AMP relay in Dictyostelium discoideum V. Adaptation of the cAMP signaling response during cAMP stimulation. J. Cell Biol. 86, 554-561. (doi:10.1083/jcb.86.2.554)
4. Barkai N, Leibler S. 1997 Robustness in simple biochemical networks. Nature 387, 913-917. (doi:10.1038/43199)
5. Alon U, Surette MG, Barkai N, Leibler S. 1999 Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 397, 168-171. (doi:10.1038/16483)
6. Yi TM, Huang Y, Simon MI, Doyle J. 2000 Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4649-4653. (doi:10.1073/pnas.97.9.4649)
7. Parent CA, Devreotes PN. 1999 A cell's sense of direction. Science 284, 765-770. (doi:10.1126/ science.284.5415.765)
8. Milo R, Shen-Orr S, Itzkovitz S, Kashtan N, Chklovskii D, Alon U. 2002 Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science 298, 824-827. (doi:10.1126/science.298.5594.824)
9. Levchenko A, Iglesias PA. 2002 Models of eukaryotic gradient sensing: application to chemotaxis of amoebae and neutrophils. Biophys. J. 82, 50-63. (doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75373-3)
10. Iglesias PA, Devreotes PN. 2008 Navigating through models of chemotaxis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 20, 35-40. (doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2007.11.011)
11. Iglesias PA, Levchenko A. 2002 Modeling the cell's guidance system. Sci. STKE 2002, re12. (doi:10. 1126/stke.2002.148.re12)
12. Krishnan J. 2011 Effects of saturation and enzyme limitation in feedforward adaptive signal transduction. IET Syst. Biol. 5, 208-219. (doi:10. 1049/iet-syb.2010.0048)
13. Iglesias PA. 2012 Chemoattractant signaling in Dictyostelium: adaptation and amplification. Sci. Signal. 5, pe8. (doi:10.1126/scisignal. 2002897)
14. Wang CJ, Bergmann A, Lin B, Kim K, Levchenko A. 2012 Diverse sensitivity thresholds in dynamic signaling responses by social amoebae. Sci. Signal. 5, ra17. (doi:10.1126/scisignal.2002449)
15. Takeda K, Shao D, Adler M, Charest PG, Loomis WF, Levine H, Groisman A, Rappel WJ, Firtel RA. 2012 Incoherent feedforward control governs adaptation of activated ras in a eukaryotic chemotaxis pathway. Sci. Signal. 5, ra2. (doi:10.1126/scisignal.2002413)
16. Dolmetsch RE, Xu K, Lewis RS. 1998 Calcium oscillations increase the efficiency and specificity of gene expression. Nature 392, 933-936. (doi:10. 1038/31960)
17. Hersen P, McClean MN, Mahadevan L, Ramanathan S. 2008 Signal processing by the HOG MAP kinase pathway. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 7165-7170. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0710770105)
18. Mettetal JT, Muzzey D, Gomez-Uribe C, van Oudenaarden A. 2008 The frequency dependence of osmo-adaptation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 319, 482-484. (doi:10.1126/science. 1151582)
19. Lipan O, Wong WH. 2005 The use of oscillatory signals in the study of genetic networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 7063-7068. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 0403790102)
20. Paliwal S, Wang CJ, Levchenko A. 2008 Pulsing cells: how fast is too fast? HFSP J. 2, 251-256. (doi:10.2976/1.2969901)
21. Ashall L et al. 2009 Pulsatile stimulation determines timing and specificity of NF-κB-dependent transcription. Science 324, 242-246. (doi:10.1126/ science.1164860)
22. Gregor T, Fujimoto K, Masaki N, Sawai S. 2010 The onset of collective behavior in social amoebae. Science 328, 1021-1025. (doi:10.1126/science. 1183415)
23. Sontag ED. 2010 Remarks on feedforward circuits, adaptation, and pulse memory. IET Syst. Biol. 4, 39-51. (doi:10.1049/iet-syb.2008.0171)
24. Muzzey D, Gomez-Uribe CA, Mettetal JT, van Oudenaarden A. 2009 A systems-level analysis of perfect adaptation in yeast osmoregulation. Cell 138, 160-171. (doi:10.1016/j. cell.2009.04.047)
25. Tu Y, Shimizu TS, Berg HC. 2008 Modeling the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli to timevarying stimuli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 14 855-14 860. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0807569105)
26. Segall JE, Block SM, Berg HC. 1986 Temporal comparisons in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 83, 8987-8991. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 83.23.8987)
27. Block SM, Segall JE, Berg HC. 1983 Adaptation kinetics in bacterial chemotaxis. J. Bacteriol. 154, 312-323.
28. Brennan MD, Cheong R, Levchenko A. 2012 Systems biology. How information theory handles cell signaling and uncertainty. Science 338, 334-335. (doi:10.1126/science.1227946)
29. Cheong R, Rhee A, Wang CJ, Nemenman I, Levchenko A. 2011 Information transduction capacity of noisy biochemical signaling networks. Science 334, 354-358. (doi:10.1126/science. 1204553)