Misleading policy messages derived from the period TFR: Should we stop using it?

Comparative Population Studies

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 637-664

  Sobotka, Tomáš ^a   Lutz, Wolfgang ^a  

^a VIENNA INSTITUTE OF DEMOGRAPHY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Fertility intentions; Fertility measurement; Fertility timing; Policies; Tempo effect; Total fertility

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884366420     PISSN: 18698980     EISSN: 18698999     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4232/10.CPoS-2010-15en     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Alders, Maarten 2000: Cohort fertility of migrant women in the Netherlands. Paper presented at the BSPS-NVD-URU Conference in Utrecht (the Netherlands), 31 August-1 September 2000.
2. Andersson, Gunnar 2004: Childbearing after migration: fertility patterns of foreignborn women in Sweden. In: International Migration Review 38,2: 747-775 [doi: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00216.x].
3. Andersson, Gunnar; Hoem, Jan M.; Duvander, Ann-Zofie 2006: Social differentials in speed-premium effects in childbearing in Sweden. In: Demographic Research 14,4: 51-70 [doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2006.14.4].
4. Barkalov, Nicholas B.; Dorbritz, Jürgen 1996: Measuring parity-progression ratios with competing techniques. An application to East Germany. In: Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft 21,4: 459-505.
5. Bongaarts, John 2002: The end of the fertility transition in the developed world. In: Population and Development Review 28,3: 419-443 [doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00419.x].
6. Bongaarts, John 2008: What can fertility indicators tell us about pronatalist policy options? In: Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2008: 39-55 [doi: 10.1553/populationyearbook2008s39].
7. Bongaarts, John; Feeney, Griffith 1998: On the quantum and tempo of fertility. In: Population and Development Review 24,2: 271-291 [doi: 10.2307/2807974].
8. Bongaarts, John; Feeney, Griffith 2000: On the quantum and tempo of fertility: Reply. In: Population and Development Review 26,3: 560-564 [doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00560.x].
9. Bongaarts, John; Feeney, Griffith 2006: The quantum and tempo of life cycle events. In: Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2006: 115-151 [doi: 10.1553/populationyearbook2006s115].
10. Bongaarts, John; Sobotka. Tomáš 2010: Demographic explanations for the recent rise in Europe's fertility. Paper presented at the European Population Conference 2010 in Vienna, 2 September 2010.
11. Breton, Didier; Prioux, France 2005: Two children or three? Influence of family policy and socio-demographic factors. In: Population-E 60,4: 415-445 [doi:10.2307/4148181].
12. Chesnais, Jean-Claude 2000: Determinants of below-replacement fertility. In: Below replacement fertility. Population Bulletin of the United Nations, Special Issue 40-41: 126-136.
13. Council of Europe 2006: Recent demographic developments in Europe 2005. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
14. Delgado, Margarita; Meil, Gerardo; Zamora López Francisco 2008: Spain: Short on children and short on family policies. In: Demographic Research, Special collection 7, Vol. 19, Article 27: 1059-1124 [doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.27].
15. European Commission 2005: Confronting demographic change: a new solidarity between the generations. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities. [http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/news/2005/mar/comm2005-94_en.pdf].
16. European Commission 2006: Five ways to defuse the demographic time bomb. Press release IP/06/1359 of the European Commission, 12 October 2006. [http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/06/1359].
17. European Parliament 1984: The European parliament on the need for promoting population growth. Resolution No. C127/78. In: Population and Development Review 10,3: 569-570.
18. European Parliament 2008: European Parliament resolution of 21 February 2008 on the demographic future of Europe (2007/2156 (INI). Accessed at: [http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P6-TA-2008-0066+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN].
19. Eurostat 2003: New Cronos database. Theme 3: Population and social conditions. Accessed in May and October 2003.
20. Eurostat 2008 and 2010: Population and Social Conditions. [Online database of Eurostat accessed in May 2008 and March 2010 at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu].
21. Eurostat 2009: Population statistics in Europe 2008: first results. Data in Focus, 31/2009. [Available online at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KSQA-09-031/EN/KS-QA-09-031-EN.PDF].
22. Frejka, Tomas; Sobotka, Tomáš 2008: Fertility in Europe: Diverse, delayed and below replacement. In: Demographic Research, Special Collection 7,19, Article 3: 15-46 [doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.3].
23. Gaschke, Susanne 2009: Bilderbuch-Vater. In: Die Zeit, 19 February 2009. [http://zeit.de/2009/09/01-Vaeter].
24. Gauthier, Anne H. 2007: The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: a review of the literature. In: Population Research and Policy Review 26: 232-346 [doi: 10.1007/s11113-007-9033-x].
25. Goldstein, Joshua R.; Sobotka, Tomáš; Jasilioniene, Aiva 2009: The end of lowest-low fertility? In: Population and Development Review 35,4: 663-700 [doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00304.x].
26. Héran, François; Pison, Gilles 2007: Two children per woman in France in 2006: are immigrants to blame? In: Population and Societies 432, March 2007 [http://www.ined.fr/fichier/t_telechargement/7659/telechargement_fichier_en_publi_pdf2_pop.and.soc.english.432.pdf].
27. Hoem, Jan M. 1990: Social policy and recent fertility change in Sweden. In: Population and Development Review 16,4: 735-748.
28. Hosseini-Chavoshi, Meimanat; McDonald, Peter; Abbasi-Shavazi, Mohammad Jalal 2006: The Iranian fertility decline, 1981-1999: An application of the synthetic parity progression ratio method. In: Population-E 61,5-6: 701-718 [doi: 10.3917/pope.605.0701].
29. INE 2009 and 2010: Movimiento Natural de la Población 2007, 2008. Datos definitivos. Madrid: Instituto National de Estadística. Downloaded in March 2009 and April 2010 at: [http://www.ine.es/jaxi/menu.do?type=pcaxis&path=/t20/e301/&file=inebase].
30. Keyfitz, Nathan 1993: A review of the book by H. Le Bras (Marianne et les lapins: l'obsession démographique). In: Population and Development Review 19,2: 365-374.
31. Kohler, Hans-Peter; Ortega, José A. 2002: Tempo-adjusted period parity progression measures, fertility postponement and completed cohort fertility. In: Demographic Research 6, Article 6: 92-144 [doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2002.6.6].
32. Kohler, Hans-Peter; Philipov, Dimiter 2001: Variance effects in the Bongaarts-Feeney formula. In: Demography 38,1: 1-16 [doi: 10.1353/dem.2001.0004].
33. Kohler, Hans-Peter; Billari, Francesco C.; Ortega, José A. 2002: The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s. In: Population and Development Review 28,4: 641-680 [doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00641.x].
34. Kuczynski, René R. 1932 [1982]: Fertility and Reproduction. Reprinted in 1982. In: Beiträge zur Demographie 6: Berlin (GDR): Akademie-Verlag.
35. Liefbroer, Aart C. 2009: Changes in family size intentions across young adulthood: A lifecourse perspective. In: European Journal of Population 25,4: 363-386 [doi: 10.1007/s10680-008-9173-7].
36. Lutz, Wolfgang 2007: Adaptation versus mitigation policies on demographic change in Europe. In: Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2007: 19-25 [doi: 10.1553/populationyearbook2007s19].
37. Lutz, Wolfgang; O'Neill, Brian C.; Scherbov, Sergei 2003: Europe's population at a turning point. In: Science 299: 1991-1992 [doi: 10.1126/science.1080316].
38. Lutz, Wolfgang; Skirbekk, Vegard 2005: Policies Addressing the Tempo Effect in Low-Fertility Countries. In: Population and Development Review 31,4: 703-725 [doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2005.00094.x].
39. Lutz, Wolfgang; Skirbekk, Vergard; Testa, Maria Rita 2006: The low fertility trap hypothesis. Forces that may lead to further postponement and fewer births in Europe. In: Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2006: 167-192 [doi: 10.1553/populationyearbook2006s167].
40. McDonald, Peter 2006: Low fertility and the state: The efficacy of policy. In: Population and Development Review 32,3: 485-510 [doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2006.00134.x].
41. Morgan, S. Philip 1981: Intention and uncertainty at later stages of childbearing: The United States 1965 and 1970. In: Demography 18,3: 267-285.
42. Neyer, Gerda; Andersson, Gunnar 2007: Consequences of family policies on childbearing behavior: Effects or artifacts? In: MPIDR Working Paper WP 2007-021. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research. [http://www.demogr.mpg.de/papers/working/wp-2007-021.pdf].
43. Neyer, Gerda; Andersson, Gunnar 2008: Consequences of family policies on childbearing behavior: Effects or artifacts? In: Population and Development Review 34,4: 699-724 [doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2008.00246.x].
44. Ní Bhrolcháin, Máire 1987: Period parity progression ratios and birth intervals in England and Wales, 1941-1971: A synthetic life table analysis. In: Population Studies 41,1: 103-125.
45. Ní Bhrolcháin, Máire 1992: Period paramount? A critique of the cohort approach to fertility. In: Population and Development Review 18,4: 599-629.
46. Ní Bhrolcháin, Máire 2007: Five reasons for measuring period fertility. Working Paper A08/05. University of Southampton: Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute.
47. Ní Bhrolcháin, Máire 2008: Tempo and the TFR. Working Paper A08/10. University of Southampton: Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute.
48. Ní Bhrolcháin, Máire; Dyson, Tim 2007: On causation in demography: Issues and illustrations. In: Population and Development Review 33,1: 1-36 [doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2007.00157.x].
49. OECD 2007: Babies and Bosses: Reconciling Work and Family Life. A Synthesis of Findings for OECD Countries. Paris: OECD.
50. ONS 2007: Birth statistics. Review of the Registrar General on births and patterns of family building England and Wales, 2006. Series FM1 35. London: Office of National Statistics.
51. Østby, Lars 2002: The demographic characteristics of immigrant populations in Norway. In: Reports 2002/22. Oslo: Statistics Norway.
52. Park, Chai Bin 1976: Lifetime probability of additional births by age and parity for American women, 1935-1968: A new measurement of period fertility. In: Demography 13,1: 1-17.
53. Population 1994: Period fertility measures. Reflective commentaries. In: Population: An English Selection 6,1994: 95-130.
54. Quesnel-Vallée, Amélie; Morgan, S. Philip 2004: Missing the target? Correspondence of fertility intentions and behavior in the U.S. In: Population Research and Policy Review 22,5-6: 497-525 [doi: 10.1023/B:POPU.0000021074.33415.c1].
55. Rallu, Jean-Louis; Toulemon, Laurent 1994a: Period fertility measures. The construction of different indices and their application to France, 1946-89. In: Population: An English Selection, 6: 59-94.
56. Rallu, Jean-Louis; Toulemon, Laurent 1994b: Period fertility measures: The authors' reply. In: Population: An English Selection 6,1994: 123-130.
57. Rindfuss, Ronald R.; Brauner-Otto, Sarah R. 2008: Institutions and the transition to adulthood: Implications for fertility tempo in low fertility settings. In: Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2008: 57-87 [doi: 10.1553/populationyearbook2008s57].
58. Ryder, Norman 1990: What is going to happen to American fertility? In: Population and Development Review 16,3: 433-454.
59. Schoen, Robert 2004: Timing effects and the interpretation of period fertility. In: Demography 41,4: 801-819 [doi: 10.1353/dem.2004.0036].
60. Smallwood, Steve; Jefferies, Julie 2003: Family building intentions in England and Wales: trends, outcomes and interpretations. In: Population Trends 112 (Summer 2003): 15-25.
61. Sobotka, Tomáš 2004a: Is lowest-low fertility explained by the postponement of childbearing? In: Population and Development Review 30,2: 195-220 [doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.010_1.x].
62. Sobotka, Tomáš 2004b: Postponement of childbearing and low fertility in Europe. PhD Thesis, University of Groningen. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press.
63. Sobotka, Tomáš 2008: The rising importance of migrants for childbearing in Europe. In: Demographic Research, Special Collection 7, 19,9: 225-248 [doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.9.]
64. Sobotka, Tomáš 2009: Subreplacement fertility intentions in Austria. In: European Journal of Population 25,4: 387-412 [doi: 10.1007/s10680-009-9183-0.]
65. Sobotka, Tomáš; Lutz, Wolfgang 2009: Misleading policy messages from the period TFR: Should we stop using it? In: European Demographic Research Papers 2009-4. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography. [http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/download/edrp_4_09.pdf].
66. Sobotka, Tomáš et al. 2005: Monthly Estimates of the Quantum of Fertility: Towards a Fertility Monitoring System in Austria. In: Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2005: 109-141 [doi: 10.1553/populationyearbook2005s109].
67. Sobotka, Tomáš; Šťastná, Anna; Zeman, Kryštof; Hamplová, Dana; Kantorová, Vladimíra 2008: Czech Republic: A rapid transformation of fertility and family behaviour. In: Demographic Research, Special collection 7, 19,14: 403-454 [doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.14].
68. Špidla, Vladimír 2007: Introduction by Commissioner Vladimír Špidla to the four essays written in response to the communication on The Demographic Future of Europe. In: Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2007: 1-3 [doi: 10.1553/populationyearbook2007s1].
69. Statistics Denmark 2007: Befolkningens udvikling 2006. Vital statistics 2006. Statistics Denmark, Copenhagen.
70. Stiglitz, Joseph E; Sen, Amartya; Fitoussi, Jean-Paul 2009: Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. URL: [http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/en], 24-10-2009.
71. Šťastná, Anna; Sobotka, Tomáš 2009: Changing parental leave and shifts in second and third-birth rates in Austria. VID Working paper 07/2009: Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography. URL: [http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/download/WP2009_07.pdf].
72. Testa, Maria Rita 2006: Childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe. Special Eurobarometer 253/Wave 65.1-TNS Opinion & Social: European Commission.
73. Testa, Maria Rita 2007: Childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe: Evidence from the Eurobarometer 2006 survey. In: Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2007: 357-379 [doi: 10.1553/populationyearbook2007s357].
74. Toulemon, Laurent 2004: Fertility among immigrant women: new data, new approach. In: Population & Societies 400 (April 2004): 1-4. URL: [http://www.ined.fr/fichier/t_publication/540/publi_pdf2_pop_and_soc_english_400.pdf].
75. Toulemon, Laurent; Leridon; Henri 1999: La famille idéale: combien d'enfants, à quel âge? [Ideal family: How many children, at what age?] In: INSEE Premiere 652, June 1999.
76. Toulemon, Laurent; Mazuy, Magali 2004: Comment prendre en compte l'âge à l'arrivée et la durée de séjour en France dans la mesure de la fécondité des immigrants? [How to consider jointly age at arrival and duration of stay in France in the measures of immigrants' fertility?] In: Documents de travail 120. Paris: INED.
77. Van Imhoff, Evert 2001: On the impossibility of inferring cohort fertility measures from period fertility measures. In: Demographic Research 5,2: 23-64 [doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2001.5.2].
78. VID 2010: European demographic data sheet 2010. Vienna Institute of Demography and IIASA. URL: [http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/datasheet/download_2010.shtml].
79. Westoff, Charles F.; Ryder, Norman B. 1977: The predictive validity of reproductive intentions. In: Demography 14,4: 431-453.
80. Whelpton, Pascal K. 1946: Reproduction rates adjusted for age, parity, fecundity, and marriage. In: Journal of the American Statistical Association 41: 501-516.
81. Zakharov, Sergei 2006: [Demographic analysis of the effect of family policy measures in Russia in the 1980s]. In: SPERO 4-5: 33-69. URL: [http://spero.socpol.ru/docs/N5_2006-33_69.pdf].
82. Zakharov, Sergei 2008: Russian Federation: From the first to second demographic transition. In: Demographic Research, Special Collection 7,19, Article 24: 907-972 [doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.24].