Overview Chapter 1: Fertility in Europe: Diverse, delayed and below replacement

Demographic Research

Volumn 19, Issue , 2008, Pages 15-46

  Frejka, Tomas ^b   Sobotka, Tomáš ^a  

^a VIENNA INSTITUTE OF DEMOGRAPHY   (Austria)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 46849085014     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14359871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.3     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Avdeev, A., and A. Monnier. 1995. A survey of modern Russian fertility, Population: An English selection 7: 1-38.
2. Bolesławski, L. 1993. Polskie tablice dzietności kobiet 1971-1992. Polish fertility tables 1971-1992. Warsaw: Główny urzad statystyczny.
3. Bongaarts, J. 2002. The end of fertility transition in the developed world, Population and Development Review 28(3): 419-443.
4. Bongaarts, J., and G. Feeney. 1998. On the quantum and tempo of fertility, Population and Development Review 24(2): 271-291.
5. Chesnais, J.-C. 1986. La transition démographique: étapes, formes, implications économiques. Etude de séries temporelles relatives à 67 pays. Cahier no 113, Paris: INED-PUF.
6. Council of Europe. 2006. Recent demographic developments in Europe 2005. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
7. Demeny, P., and G. McNicoll. 2006. The political demography of the world system, 2000-2050, in P. Demeny and G. McNicoll (Eds.), Population and Development Review, a supplement to vol. 32, pp: 254-287.
8. Dunnell, K. 2007. The changing demographic picture of the UK. National Statisticians annual article on the population, Population Trends 130: 9-21.
9. Eurostat. 2006. Population in Europe 2005. First results. Statistics in Focus, Population and Social Conditions, 16/2006. Luxembourg: European Communities.
10. Eurostat. 2007. Population and Social Conditions. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu.
11. Festy, P. 1979. La fécondité des pays occidentaux de 1870 a 1970. Travaux et Documents No. 85. Paris: INED - PUF.
12. Freika, T. 2004. The 'curiously high' fertility of the USA, Population Studies 58(1): 88-92.
13. Frejka, T., and J.-P. Sardon. 2004. Childbearing Trends and Prospects in Low-Fertility countries: A cohort analysis, Dorbrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
14. Frejka, T., and J.-P. Sardon. 2005. The direction of contemporary fertility trends in the developed countries: further decline, plateau or upswing? Proceedings of the XXV IUSSP International Conference. Tours: France.
15. Frejka, T., and J.-P. Sardon. 2006. First birth trends in developed countries: persisting parenthood postponement, Demographic Research 15(6): 147-180. www.demographic-research.org.
16. Frejka, T., and J.-P. Sardon. 2007. Cohort birth order, parity progression ratio and parity distribution trends in developed countries, Demographic Research 16(11): 315-374. www.demographic-research.org.
17. Frejka, T., and J. Ross. 2001. Paths to sub-replacement fertility: the empirical evidence, in R. Bulatao and J. B. Casterline (Eds.), Global Fertility Transition. Population and Development Review, a supplement to vol. 27. pp: 213-254.
18. Gabrielli, G., A. Paterno, and S. Strozza. 2007. Dynamics, characteristics, and demographic behaviour of immigrants in some south-European countries. Paper presented at an international conference on "Migration - and Development," Moscow: 13-15 September 2007.
19. Glass, D. 1937. The population problem and the future, Eugenics Review 29(1): 39-47. Reprinted in Population and Development Review 31(3): 557-572 (2005).
20. Goldstein, J. 2006. How late can first births be postponed? Some illustrative population-level calculations, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2006: 153-165.
21. Hamilton, B. E., J. A. Martin, and S. J. Ventura. 2007. Births. Preliminary data for 2006. National Vital Statistics Reports 56(7). December 2007, Atlanta: NCHS and CDC.
22. Héran, F., and G. Pison. 2007. Two children per woman in France in 2006: are immigrants to blame?, Population and Societies 432. http://www.ined.fr/fichier/t_telechargement/7659/ telechargement_fichier_en_publi_pdf2_pop.and.soc.english.432.pdf
23. Kohler, H.-P., and J. A. Ortega. 2002a. Tempo-adjusted period parity progression measures, fertility postponement and completed cohort fertility, Demographic Research 6(6): 92-144. www.demographic-research.org.
24. Kohler, H.-P., F. C. Billari, and J. A. Ortega. 2002. The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s, Population and Development Review 28(4): 641-680.
25. Lesthaeghe, R., and L. Neidert. 2006. The second demographic transition in the United States: Exception or textbook example?, Population and Development Review 32(4): 669-698.
26. Lesthaeghe, R., and P. Willems. 1999. Is low fertility a temporary phenomenon in the European Union?, Population and Development Review 25(2): 211-228.
27. Lutz, W., V. Skirbekk, and M. R. Testa. 2006. The low-fertility trap hypothesis: forces that may lead to further postponement and fewer births in Europe, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2006: 167-192.
28. McDonald, P. 2000. Gender equity in theories of fertility transition, Population and Development Review 26(3): 427-439.
29. McDonald, P. 2006. An assessment of policies that support having children from the perspectives of equity, efficiency and efficacy, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2006: 213-234.
30. Morgan, P. S. 1996. Characteristic features of modern American fertility, in.: J. B. Casterline, R. D. Lee and K. A. Foote (Eds.), Fertility in the United States. New patterns, new theories. Supplement to Population and Development Review 22, New York: Population Council, pp: 19-63.
31. Roig Vila, M., and T. Castro Martín. 2007. Childbearing patterns of foreign women in a new immigration country: The case of Spain, Population-E 62(3): 351-380.
32. Sardon, J.-P. 1991. Generation replacement in Europe since. 1900, Population: An English Selection 3: 15-32.
33. Schoen, R. 2004. Timing effects and the interpretation of period fertility, Demography 41(4): 801-819.
34. Smallwood, S. 2002. The effect of changes in the timing of childbearing on measuring fertility in England and Wales, Population Trends 109: 36-45. www.statistics.gov.uk/STATBASE/Product.asp?vlnk=6303.
35. Sobotka, T. 2003. Tempo-quantum and period-cohort interplay in fertility changes in Europe. Evidence from the Czech Republic, Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden, Demographic Research 8(6): 151-214. www.demographic-research.org.
36. Sobotka, T. 2004a. Postponement of childbearing and low fertility in Europe. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press.
37. Sobotka, T. 2004b. Is lowest-low fertility explained by the postponement of childbearing?, Population and Development Review 30(2): 195-220.
38. Sobotka, T., H.-P. Kohler, and F. C. Billari. 2007. The increase in late childbearing in Europe, Japan, and the United States. Paper presented at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, New York: 29-31 March 2007.
39. Testa, M. R. 2007. Childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe: evidence from the Eurobarometer 2006 survey, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2007: 357-379.
40. Toulemon, L. 2004. Le fécondité est-elle encore naturelle? Application au retard des naissances et à son influence sur la descendance finale, in Chaire Quetelet 2002, Academia Bruylant/ L'Harmattan, pp: 1-28.
41. Van Imhoff, E. 2001. On the impossibility of inferring cohort fertility measures from period fertility measures, Demographic Research 5(2):23-64. www.demographic-research.org.
42. VID. 2006. European demographic data sheet 2006. Vienna: Vienna Institute of demography, IIASA, Population reference Bureau. http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/popeurope/index.html.