Super-paramagnetic responsive nanofibrous scaffolds under static magnetic field enhance osteogenesis for bone repair in vivo

Scientific Reports

Volumn 3, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Meng, Jie ^a   Xiao, Bo ^b   Zhang, Yu ^c   Liu, Jian ^a   Xue, Huadan ^c   Lei, Jing ^a   Kong, Hua ^a   Huang, Yuguang ^b   Jin, Zhengyu ^c   Gu, Ning ^c   Xu, Haiyan ^a  

^a PEKING UNION MEDICAL COLLEGE   (China)

^b SOUTHEAST UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c PEKING UNION MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; COLLAGEN; MAGNETITE NANOPARTICLE; NANOFIBER; OSTEOCALCIN; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE REGENERATION; IMPLANT; MAGNETIC FIELD; MATERIALS TESTING; METABOLISM; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; RABBIT; RADIATION EXPOSURE; TIME; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE REGENERATION; COLLAGEN; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETITE NANOPARTICLES; MATERIALS TESTING; NANOFIBERS; OSTEOCALCIN; OSTEOGENESIS; RABBITS; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84884251137     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep02655     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Kasoju, N. & Bora, U. Silk fibroin in tissue engineering. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 1, 393-412 (2012).
2. Dinopoulos, H., Dimitriou, R. & Giannoudis, P. V. Bone graft substitutes: What are the options? Surgeon. 10, 230-9 (2012).
3. Gloria, A., De Santis, R. & Ambrosio, L. Polymer-based composite scaffolds for tissue engineering. J. Appl. Biomater. Biomech. 8, 57-67 (2010).
4. Wu, C., Chang, J. & Xiao, Y. Mesoporous bioactive glasses as drug delivery and bone tissue regeneration platforms. Ther. Deliv. 2, 1189-98 (2011).
5. Bueno, E. M. & Glowacki, J. Cell-free and cell-based approaches for bone regeneration. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 5, 685-97 (2009).
6. Robling, A. G., Burr, D. B. & Turner, C. H. Recovery periods restore mechanosensitivity to dynamically loaded bone. J. Exp. Biol. 204, 3389-99 (2001). (Pubitemid 34861350)
7. Giannoudis, P. V., Einhorn, T. A. & Marsh, D. Fracture healing: the diamond concept. Injury. 38, S3-6 (2007). (Pubitemid 351162866)
8. Hente, R., Fuchtmeier, B., Schlegel, U., Ernstberger, A. & Perren, S. M. The influence of cyclic compression and distraction on the healing of experimental tibial fractures. J. Orthop. Res. 22, 709-715 (2004). (Pubitemid 38756248)
9. Zeichen, J., van Griensven, M. & Bosch, U. The proliferative response of isolated human tendon fibroblasts to cyclic biaxial mechanical strain. Am. J. Sports. Med. 28, 888-892 (2000).
10. Kaspar, D., Seidl, W., Neidlinger-Wilke, C., Ignatius, A. & Claes, L. Dynamic cell stretching increases human osteoblast proliferation and CICP synthesis but decreases osteocalcin synthesis and alkaline phosphatase activity. J. Biomech. 33, 45-51 (2000).
11. Jin, M., Frank, E. H., Quinn, T. M., Hunziker, E. B. & Grodzinsky, A. J. Tissue shear deformation stimulates proteoglycan and protein biosynthesis in bovine cartilage explants. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 395, 41-48 (2001). (Pubitemid 33030141)
12. Grace, K. L., Revell, W. J.&Brookes, M. The effects of pulsed electromagnetism on fresh fracture healing: osteochondral repair in the rat femoral groove. Orthopedics. 21, 297-302 (1998). (Pubitemid 28145110)
13. Glazer, P. A.,Heilmann, M. R., Lotz, J. C. & Bradford, D. S. Use of electromagnetic fields in a spinal fusion. A rabbit model. Spine. 22, 2351-2356 (1997). (Pubitemid 28069103)
14. Takano-Yamamoto, T., Kawakami, M. & Sakuda, M. Effect of a pulsing electromagnetic field on demineralized bone-matrix-induced bone formation in a bony defect in the premaxilla of rats. J. Dent. Res. 71, 1920-1925 (1992).
15. Miller, G. J., Burchardt, H., Enneking, W. F. & Tylkowski, C. M. Electromagnetic stimulation of canine bone grafts. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 66, 693-698 (1984) (Pubitemid 14082333)
16. Bruce, G. K., Howlett, C. R. & Huckstep, R. L. Effect of a static magnetic field on fracture healing in a rabbit radius. Preliminary results. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 222, 300-306 (1987). (Pubitemid 17146542)
17. Yan, Q. C., Tomita, N. & Ikada, Y. Effects of static magnetic field on bone formation of rat femurs. Med. Eng. Phys. 20, 397-402 (1998). (Pubitemid 28459343)
18. Assiotis, A., Sachinis, N. P. & Chalidis, B. E. Pulsed electromagnetic fields for the treatment of tibial delayed unions and nonunions. A prospective clinical study and review of the literature. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 7, 24 (2012).
19. Chalidis, B., Sachinis, N., Assiotis, A. & Maccauro, G. Stimulation of bone formation and fracture healing with pulsed electromagnetic fields: biologic responses and clinical implications. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 24, 17-20 (2011).
20. Jaberi, F. M. et al. moderate-intensity static magnetic field enhances repair of cartilage damage in rabbits. Arch. Med. Res. 42, 268-273 (2011).
21. Torbet, J. & Ronziere, M. C. Magnetic alignment of collagen during self-assembly. Biochem. J. 219, 1057-1059 (1984). (Pubitemid 14141765)
22. Murthy, N. S. Liquid crystallinity in collagen solutions and magnetic orientation of collagen fibrils. Biopolymers. 23, 1261-1267 (1984). (Pubitemid 14072021)
23. Torbet, J., Freyssinet, J. M. & Hudry-Clergeon, G. Oriented fibrin gels formed by polymerization in strong magnetic fields. Nature. 289, 91-93 (1981). (Pubitemid 11178464)
24. Ueno, S., Iwasaka, M. & Tsuda, H. Effects of Magnetic-Fields on Fibrin Polymerization and Fibrinolysis. IEEE. TRANS. MAGN. 29, 3352-3354 (1993).
25. Iwasaka, M., Ueno, S. & Tsuda, H. Effects of Magnetic-Fields on Fibrinolysis. J. Appl. Phys. 75, 7162-7164 (1994).
26. Yamagishi, A., Takeuchi, T., Higashi, T. & Date, M. Diamagnetic Orientation of Blood-Cells in High Magnetic-Field. Physica B. 177, 523-526 (1992).
27. Higashi, T. et al. Orientation of erythrocytes in a strong static magnetic field. Blood. 82, 1328-1334 (1993). (Pubitemid 23254010)
28. Higashi, T., Yamagishi, A., Takeuchi, T. & Date, M. Effects of Static Magnetic- Fields on Erythrocyte Rheology. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 36, 101-108 (1995).
29. Higashi, T., Sagawa, S., Kawaguchi, N. & Yamagishi, A. Effects of a strong static magnetic field on blood platelets. Platelets. 4, 341-342 (1993). (Pubitemid 24146988)
30. Vassilev, P. M., Dronzine, R. T., Vassileva, M. P. & Georgiev, G. A. Parallel arrays of microtubules formed in electric and magnetic fields. Biosci. Rep. 2, 1025-1029 (1982). (Pubitemid 13154916)
31. Kotani, H. et al. Strong static magnetic field stimulates bone formation to a definite orientation in vitro and in vivo. J. Bone.Miner. Res. 17, 1814-1821 (2002).
32. Leesungbok, R. et al. The effects of a static magnetic field on bone formation around a SLA treated titanium implant. J. Oral. Implantol. 39, 248-255 (2013).
33. Serantes, D., Baldomir, D. & Pereiro, M. Nonmonotonic evolution of the blocking temperature in dispersions of superparamagnetic nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Mater. 82, 134433 (2010).
34. De Santis, R. et al. A basic approach toward the development of nanocomposite magnetic scaffolds for advanced bone tissue engineering. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 12, 3599-3605 (2011).
35. Meng, J. et al. Paramagnetic nanofibrous composite films enhance the osteogenic responses of pre-osteoblast cells. Nanoscale. 2, 2565-2569 (2010).
36. Zeng, X. B. et al. Magnetic responsive hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds construction for bone defect reparation. Int. J. Nanomedicine. 7, 3365-3378 (2012).
37. Panseri, S. et al. Magnetic hydroxyapatite bone substitutes to enhance tissue regeneration: evaluation in vitro using osteoblast-like cells and in vivo in a bone defect. PLoS One. 7, e38710 (2012).
38. Gloria, A. et al. Magnetic poly(e-caprolactone)/iron-doped hydroxyapatite nanocomposite substrates for advanced bone tissue engineering. J. R. Soc. Interface. 10, 20120833 (2013).
39. Liu, J. W. et al. Synthesis, Characterization, and Application of Composite Alginate Microspheres with Magnetic and Fluorescent Functionalities. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 113, 4042-4051 (2009).
40. Liu, W., Thomopoulos, S. & Xia, Y. Electrospun nanofibers for regenerative medicine. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 1, 10-25 (2012).
41. Venugopal, J. et al. Biomimetic hydroxyapatite-containing composite nanofibrous substrates for bone tissue engineering. Philos. Transact. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 368, 2065-81 (2010).
42. Zhang, Z., Hu, J. & Ma, P. X. Nanofiber-based delivery of bioactive agents and stem cells to bone sites. Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 64, 1129-41 (2012).
43. Prabhakaran, M. P., Ghasemi-Mobarakeh, L. & Ramakrishna, S. Electrospun composite nanofibers for tissue regeneration. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 11, 3039-57 (2011).
44. Holzwarth, J. M. & Ma, P. X. Biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 32, 9622-9 (2011).
45. Yuge, L. et al. Physical stress by magnetic force accelerates differentiation of human osteoblasts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 311, 32-8 (2003). (Pubitemid 37297885)