Magnetic responsive hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds construction for bone defect reparation

International Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 7, Issue , 2012, Pages 3365-3378

  Zeng, Xiao Bo ^a   Hu, Hao ^a   Xie, Li Qin ^a   Lan, Fang ^a   Jiang, Wen ^a   Wu, Yao ^a   Gu, Zhong Wei ^a  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bone repair; Magnetic nanoparticles; Magnetic responsive; Magnetic therapy

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE BONE ISOENZYME; HYDROXYAPATITE; MAGNETIC NANOPARTICLE; MAGNETIC SCAFFOLD; OSTEOCALCIN; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL CELL CULTURE; ARTICLE; BONE DEFECT; BONE GROWTH; BONE REGENERATION; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL PROLIFERATION; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; IN VITRO STUDY; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOTHERAPY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; RAT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL LINE; CELL PROLIFERATION; DURAPATITE; MAGNETITE NANOPARTICLES; MICE; NANOCOMPOSITES; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOCALCIN; RATS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84869989699     PISSN: 11769114     EISSN: 11782013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S32264     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bassett CA, Schink-Ascani M, Lewis SM. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on Steinberg ratings of femoral head osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;(246):172-185.
2. Santini MT, Rainaldi G, Ferrante A, Indovina PL, Vecchia P, Donelli G. Effects of a 50Hz sinusoidal magnetic field on cell adhesion molecule expression in two human osteosarcoma cell lines (MG-63 and Saos-2). Bioelectromagnetics. 2003;24(5):327-338.
3. McLeod KJ, Collazo L. Suppression of a differentiation response in MC-3T3-E1 osteoblast-like cells by sustained, low-level, 30Hz magnetic-field exposure. Radiat Res. 2000;153(5 Pt 2):706-714.
4. Jansen JH, van der Jagt OP, Punt BJ, etal. Stimulation of osteogenic differentiation in human osteoprogenitor cells by pulsed electromagnetic fields: an in vitro study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:188.
5. Fini M, Cadossi R, Canè V, etal. The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on the osteointegration of hydroxyapatite implants in cancellous bone: a morphologic and microstructural in vivo study. J Orthop Res. 2002;20(4):756-763.
6. Zhang XY, Xue Y, Zhang Y. Effects of 0.4 T rotating magnetic field exposure on density, strength, calcium and metabolism of rat thigh bones. Bioelectromagnetics. 2006;27(1):1-9.
7. Chang K, Chang WH. Pulsed electromagnetic fields prevent osteoporosis in an ovariectomized female rat model: a prostaglandin E2-associated process. Bioelectromagnetics. 2003;24(3):189-198.
8. Taylor KF, Inoue N, Rafiee B, Tis JE, McHale KA, Chao EY. Effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on maturation of regenerate bone in a rabbit limb lengthening model. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(1):2-10.
9. Sun S, Zeng H, Robinson DB, etal. Monodisperse MFe2O4 (M = Fe, Co, Mn) nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126(1):273-279.
10. Wang L, Yang Z, Gao J, etal. A biocompatible method of decorporation: bisphosphonate-modified magnetite nanoparticles to remove uranyl ions from blood. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128(41):13358-13359.
11. Kim J, Lee JE, Lee J, etal. Magnetic fluorescent delivery vehicle using uniform mesoporous silica spheres embedded with monodisperse magnetic and semiconductor nanocrystals. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;128(3): 688-689.
12. Jun YW, Huh YM, Choi JS, etal. Nanoscale size effect of magnetic nanocrystals and their utilization for cancer diagnosis via magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127(16):5732-5733.
13. Bretcanu O, Verné E, Cöisson M, Tiberto P, Allia P. Magnetic properties of the ferrimagnetic glass-ceramics for hyperthermia. J Magn Magn Mater. 2006;305(2):529-533.
14. Wei Y, Zhang X, Song Y, etal. Magnetic biodegradable Fe3O4/CS/PVA nanofibrous membranes for bone regeneration. Biomed Mater. 2011;6(5):055008.
15. Meng J, Zhang Y, Qi X, etal. Paramagnetic nanofibrous composite films enhance the osteogenic responses of pre-osteoblast cells. Nanoscale. 2010;2(12):2565-2569.
16. Bañobre-López M, Piñeiro-Redondo Y, De Santis R, etal. Poly(caprolactone) based magnetic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Appl Phys. 2011;109(7):07B313.
17. Wu C, Fan W, Zhu Y, etal. Multifunctional magnetic mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds with a hierarchical pore structure. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(10):3563-3572.
18. Tampieri A, Landi E, Valentini F, etal. A conceptually new type of bio-hybrid scaffold for bone regeneration. Nanotechnology. 2011; 22(1):015104.
19. Tampieri A, D'Alessandro T, Sandri M, etal. Intrinsic magnetism and hyperthermia in bioactive Fe-doped hydroxyapatite. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(2):843-851.
20. De Santis R, Gloria A, Russo T, etal. A basic approach toward the development of nanocomposite magnetic scaffolds for advanced bone tissue engineering. J Appl Polym Sci. 2011;122(6):3599-3605.
21. Bock N, Riminucci A, Dionigi C, etal. A novel route in bone tissue engineering: magnetic biomimetic scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(3): 786-796.
22. Jun YW, Seo JW, Cheon J. Nanoscaling laws of magnetic nanoparticles and their applicabilities in biomedical sciences. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41(2):179-189.
23. Jeong U, Teng X, Wang Y, Yang H, Xia Y. Superparamagnetic colloids: controlled synthesis and niche applications. Adv Mater. 2007;19(1): 33-60.
24. Gupta AK, Gupta M. Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biomaterials. 2005;26(18): 3995-4021.
25. Wu Y, Jiang W, Wen X, etal. A novel calcium phosphate ceramic-magnetic nanoparticle composite as a potential bone substitute. Biomed Mater. 2010;5(1):15001.
26. Sun S, Zeng H. Size-controlled synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124(28):8204-8205.
27. Schieker M, Seitz H, Drosse I, Seitz S, Mutschler W. Biomaterials as scaffold for bone tissue engineering. European Journal of Trauma. 2006;32(2):114-124.
28. Hing KA. Bioceramic bone graft substitutes: influence of porosity and chemistry. International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology. 2005;2(3):184-199.
29. Vallet-Regí M. Ceramics for medical applications. Journal of the Chemical Society, Dalton Transactions. 2001(2):97-108.
30. Vallet-Regí M. Revisiting ceramics for medical applications. Dalton Trans. 2006;(44):5211-5220.
31. Yuan H, van Blitterswijk CA, de Groot K, de Bruijn JD. Cross-species comparison of ectopic bone formation in biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) and hydroxyapatite (HA) scaffolds. Tissue Eng. 2006;12(6): 1607-1615.
32. Rodrigues CV, Serricella P, Linhares AB, etal. Characterization of a bovine collagen-hydroxyapatite composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2003;24(27):4987-4997.
33. De Mattei M, Caruso A, Traina GC, Pezzetti F, Baroni T, Sollazzo V. Correlation between pulsed electromagnetic fields exposure time and cell proliferation increase in human osteosarcoma cell lines and human normal osteoblast cells in vitro. Bioelectromagnetics. 1999;20(3): 177-182.
34. Chang WH, Chen LT, Sun JS, Lin FH. Effect of pulse-burst electromagnetic field stimulation on osteoblast cell activities. Bioelectromagnetics. 2004;25(6):457-465.
35. Hughes S, EI Haj AJ, Dobson J. Magnetic micro-and nanoparticle mediated activation of mechanosensitive ion channels. Med Eng Phys. 2005;27(9):754-762.
36. Huang DM, Hsiao JK, Chen YC, etal. The promotion of human mesenchymal stem cell proliferation by superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Biomaterials. Aug 2009;30(22):3645-3651.
37. Shen JF, Chao YL, Du L. Effects of static magnetic fields on the voltage-gated potassium channel currents in trigeminal root ganglion neurons. Neurosci Lett. March 26, 2007;415(2):164-168.