Comparative aspects of mammary gland development and homeostasis

Annual Review of Animal Biosciences

Volumn 1, Issue , 2013, Pages 179-202

  Capuco, Anthony V ^a   Ellis, Steven E ^b  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

cell turnover; mammary development; mammary stem cells; progenitor cells

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; FEMALE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HUMAN; MAMMARY GLAND; PHYSIOLOGY; UDDER;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMARY GLANDS, ANIMAL; MAMMARY GLANDS, HUMAN;

EID: 84884244010     PISSN: 21658102     EISSN: 21658110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103632     Document Type: Review

References (143)

1. Williams JM, Daniel CW. 1983. Mammary ductal elongation: differentiation of myoepithelium and basal lamina during branching morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. 97:274-90
2. Tucker HA. 1969. Factors affecting mammary gland cell numbers. J. Dairy Sci. 52:720-29
3. DeOme KB, Faulkin LJ Jr, Bern HA, Blair PB. 1959. Development of mammary tumors from hyperplastic alveolar nodules transplanted into gland-free mammary fat pads of female C3H mice. Cancer Res. 19:515-20
4. Sinha YN, Tucker HA. 1969. Mammary development and pituitary prolactin level of heifers from birth through puberty and during the estrous cycle. J. Dairy Sci. 52:507-12
5. Johnsson ID, Hart IC. 1985. Pre-pubertal mammogenesis in the sheep. 1. The effects of level of nutrition on growth and mammary development in female lambs. Anim. Prod. 41:323-32
6. Meyer MJ, Capuco AV, Ross DA, Lintault LM, Van Amburgh ME. 2006. Developmental and nutritional regulation of the prepubertal bovine mammary gland: II. Epithelial cell proliferation, parenchymal accretion rate, and allometric growth. J. Dairy Sci. 89:4298-304
7. Meyer MJ, Capuco AV, Ross DA, LintaultLM,Van AmburghME.2006. Developmental and nutritional regulation of the prepubertal heifer mammary gland: I. Parenchyma and fat pad mass and composition. J. Dairy Sci. 89:4289-97
8. Dessauge F, Finot L, Wiart S, Aubry JM, Ellis SE. 2009. Effects of ovariectomy in prepubertal goats. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 60(Suppl. 3):127-33
9. Horigan KC, Trott JF, Barndollar AS, Scudder JM, Blauwiekel RM, Hovey RC. 2009. Hormone interactions confer specific proliferative and histomorphogenic responses in the porcinemammarygland. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 37:124-38
10. Rowson AR, Daniels KM, Ellis SE, Hovey RC. 2012. Growth and development of the mammary glands of livestock: a veritable barnyard of opportunities. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 23:557-66
11. Ellis S, Akers RM, Capuco AV, Safayi S. 2011. Bovine mammary epithelial cell lineages and parenchymal development. J. Anim. Sci. 90:1666-73
12. Capuco AV, Ellis S, Wood DL, Akers RM, Garrett W. 2002. Postnatal mammary ductal growth: threedimensional imaging of cell proliferation, effects of estrogen treatment, and expression of steroid receptors in prepubertal calves. Tissue Cell 34:143-54
13. Tucker HA. 1979. Endocrinology of lactation. Semin. Perinatol. 3:199-223
14. Hovey RC, McFadden TB, Akers RM. 1999. Regulation of mammary gland growth and morphogenesis by the mammary fat pad: a species comparison. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 4:53-68
15. Zeps N, Bentel JM, Papadimitriou JM,D'Antuono MF, Dawkins HJS. 1998. Estrogen receptor-negative epithelial cells in mouse mammary gland development and growth. Differentiation 62:221-26
16. Anderson E, Clarke RB. 2004. Steroid receptors and cell cycle in normal mammary epithelium. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 9:3-13
17. Ciarloni L, Mallepell S, Brisken C. 2007. Amphiregulin is an essential mediator of estrogen receptor a function in mammary gland development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:5455-60
18. Joshi PA, Jackson HW, Beristain AG, Di Grappa MA, Mote PA, et al. 2010. Progesterone induces adult mammary stem cell expansion. Nature 465:803-7
19. Beleut M, Rajaram RD, Caikovski M, Ayyanan A, Germano D, et al. 2010. Two distinct mechanisms underlie progesterone-induced proliferation in themammary gland. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci.USA107:2989-94
20. Schramek D, Leibbrandt A, Sigl V, Kenner L, Pospisilik JA, et al. 2010. Osteoclast differentiation factor RANKL controls development of progestin-driven mammary cancer. Nature 468:98-102
21. Khaled WT, Read EK, Nicholson SE, Baxter FO, Brennan AJ, et al. 2007. The IL-4/IL-13/Stat6 signalling pathway promotes luminal mammary epithelial cell development. Development 134:2739-50
22. Watson CJ. 2009. Immune cell regulators in mouse mammary development and involution. J. Anim. Sci. 87:35-42
23. Gouon-Evans V, Lin EY, Pollard JW. 2002. Requirement of macrophages and eosinophils and their cytokines/chemokines for mammary gland development. Breast Cancer Res. 4:155-64
24. Gyorki DE, Asselin-Labat ML, van Rooijen N, Lindeman GJ, Visvader JE. 2009. Resident macrophages influence stem cell activity in the mammary gland. Breast Cancer Res. 11:R62
25. Lilla JN, Werb Z. 2010. Mast cells contribute to the stromal microenvironment in mammary gland branching morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. 337:124-33
26. Oftedal OT. 2002. The mammary gland and its origin during synapsid evolution. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 7:225-52
27. Hurley WL. 2001. Mammary gland growth in the lactating sow. Livest. Prod. Sci. 70:149-57
28. Hadsell DL, Torres D, George J, Capuco AV, Ellis SE, Fiorotto ML. 2006. Changes in secretory cell turnover, and mitochondrial oxidative damage in the mouse mammary gland during a single prolonged lactation cycle suggest the possibility of accelerated cellular aging. Exp. Gerontol. 41:271-81
29. Knight CH, Docherty AH, Peaker M. 1984. Milk yield in rats in relation to activity and size of the mammary secretory cell population. J. Dairy Res. 51:29-35
30. Anderson RR. 1985. Mammary gland. In Lactation, ed. BL Larson, pp.3-38. Ames, IA: Iowa St. Univ. Press
31. Capuco AV, Wood DL, Baldwin R, McLeod K, Paape MJ. 2001. Mammary cell number, proliferation, and apoptosis during a bovine lactation: relation to milk production and effect of bST. J. Dairy Sci. 84:2177-87
32. Hale SA, Capuco AV, Erdman RA. 2003. Milk yield and mammary growth effects due to increased milking frequency during early lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 86:2061-71
33. Knight CH, Peaker M. 1984. Mammary development and regression during lactation in goats in relation to milk secretion. Q. J. Exp. Physiol. 69:331-38
34. Pitelka DR, Hamamoto ST, Duafala JG, Nemanic MK. 1973. Cell contacts in the mouse mammary gland. I. Normal gland in postnatal development and the secretory cycle. J. Cell Biol. 56:797-818
35. Nguyen DA, Neville MC. 1998. Tight junction regulation in the mammary gland. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 3:233-46
36. Casey TM, Plaut K. 2007. The role of glucocorticoids in secretory activation and milk secretion, a historical perspective. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 12:293-304
37. Hollmann KH. 1969. Quantitative electron microscopy of sub-cellular organization in mammary gland cells before and after parturition. In Lactogenesis: The Initiation of Milk Secretion of Parturition, ed. M Reynolds, SJ Folley, p. 27. Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
38. Chatterton RT, Harris JA, Wynn RM. 1975. Lactogenesis in the rat: an ultrastructural study of the initiation of the secretory process. J. Reprod. Fertil. 43:479-84
39. Akers RM, Bauman DE, Goodman GT, Capuco AV, Tucker HA. 1981. Prolactin regulation of cytological differentiation of mammary epithelial cells in periparturient cows. Endocrinology 109:31-40
40. Pitkow HS, Reece RP, Waszilycsak GL. 1972. The integrity of mammaryalveolar cells in two consecutive lactations. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 139:845-50
41. Capuco AV, Ellis SE, Hale SA, Long E, Erdman RA, et al. 2003. Lactation persistency: insights from mammary cell proliferation studies. J. Anim. Sci. 81(Suppl. 3):18-31
42. Wilde CJ, Knight CH, Flint DJ. 1999. Control of milk secretion and apoptosis during mammary involution. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 4:129-36
43. Fadok VA. 1999. Clearance: the last and often forgotten stage of apoptosis. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 4:203-11
44. Li ML, Liu XW, Robinson G, Bar-Peled U, Wagner KU, et al. 1997. Mammary-derived signals activate programmed cell death during the first stage of mammary gland involution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:3425-30
45. Capuco AV, Akers RM. 1999. Mammary involution in dairy animals. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 4:137-44
46. Ford JA Jr, Kim SW, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Hurley WL. 2003. Quantification of mammary gland tissue size and composition changes after weaning in sows. J. Anim. Sci. 81:2583-89
47. SwansonEW.1965. Comparing continuous milking with sixty-day dry periods in successive lactations. J. Dairy Sci. 48:1205-9
48. Smith A, Wheelock JV, Dodd FH. 1967. The effect of milking throughout pregnancy on milk secretion in the succeeding lactation. J. Dairy Res. 34:145-50
49. Remond B, Ollier A, Miranda G. 1992. Milking of cows in late pregnancy: milk production during this period and during the succeeding lactation. J. Dairy Res. 59:233-41
50. Caja G, Salama AA, Such X. 2006. Omitting the dry-off period negatively affects colostrum and milk yield in dairy goats. J. Dairy Sci. 89:4220-28
51. Capuco AV, Akers RM, Smith JJ. 1997. Mammary growth in Holstein cows during the dry period: quantification of nucleic acids and histology. J. Dairy Sci. 80:477-87
52. Holst BD, Hurley WL, Nelson DR. 1987. Involution of the bovine mammary gland: histological and ultrastructural changes. J. Dairy Sci. 70:935-44
53. Hurley WL. 1989. Mammary gland function during involution. J. Dairy Sci. 72:1637-46
54. Quarrie LH, Addey CVP, Wilde CJ. 1996. Programmed cell death during mammary tissue involution induced by weaning, litter removal, and milk stasis. J. Cell. Physiol. 168:559-69
55. Wilde CJ, Addey CVP, Li P, Fernig DG. 1997. Programmed cell death in bovine mammary tissue during lactation and involution. Exp. Physiol. 82:943-53
56. Li P, Rudland PS, Fernig DG, Finch LM, Wilde CJ. 1999. Modulation of mammary development and programmed cell death by the frequency of milk removal in lactating goats. J. Physiol. 519:885-900
57. Capuco AV, Annen E, Fitzgerald AC, Ellis SE, Collier RJ. 2006. Mammary cell turnover: relevance to lactation persistency and dry period management. In Ruminant Physiology: Digestion, Metabolism and Impact of Nutrition on Gene Expression, Immunology and Stress, ed. K Sejrsen, T Hvelplund, MO Nielsen, pp. 363-88. Wageningen, Neth.: Wageningen Acad. Publ.
58. Capuco AV, Li M, Long E, Ren S, Hruska KS, et al. 2002. Concurrent pregnancy retards mammary involution: effects on apoptosis and proliferation of the mammary epithelium after forced weaning of mice. Biol. Reprod. 66:1471-76
59. Thatcher WW, Tucker HA. 1968. Intensive nursing and lactational performance during extended lactation. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 128:46-48
60. Paape MJ, Tucker HA. 1969. Influence of length of dry period on subsequent lactation in the rat. J. Dairy Sci. 52:518-22
61. Annen EL, Fitzgerald AC, Gentry PC, McGuire MA, Capuco AV, et al. 2007. Effect of continuous milking and bovine somatotropin supplementation on mammary epithelial cell turnover. J. Dairy Sci. 90:165-83
62. Annen EL, Collier RJ, McGuire MA, Vicini JL, Ballam JM, Lormore MJ. 2004. Effect of modified dry period lengths and bovine somatotropin on yield and composition of milk from dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 87:3746-61
63. Fitzgerald AC, Annen-Dawson EL, Baumgard LH, Collier RJ. 2007. Evaluation of continuous lactation and increased milking frequency on milk production andmammarycell turnover in primiparous Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 90:5483-89
64. Bauman DE. 1999. Bovine somatotropin and lactation: from basic science to commercial application. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 17:101-16
65. Molyneux G, Regan J, Smalley MJ. 2007. Mammary stem cells and breast cancer. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 64:3248-60
66. Al-HajjM,WichaMS,Benito-Hernandez A, Morrison SJ, ClarkeMF.2003. Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:3983-88
67. Evans MJ, Kaufman MH. 1981. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292:154-56
68. Martin GR. 1981. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:7634-48
69. Sherley JL. 2008. A new mechanism for aging: chemical "age spots" in immortal DNA strands in distributed stem cells. Breast Dis. 29:37-46
70. Jones PH, Watt FM. 1993. Separation of human epidermal stem cells from transit amplifying cells on the basis of differences in integrin function and expression. Cell 73:713-24
71. Cosentino L, Shaver-Walker P, Heddle JA. 1996. The relationships among stem cells, crypts, and villi in the small intestine of mice as determined by mutation tagging. Dev. Dyn. 207:420-28
72. Fliedner TM. 1998. The role of blood stem cells in hematopoietic cell renewal. Stem Cells 16(Suppl. 1): 13-29
73. Jones P, Simons BD. 2008. Epidermal homeostasis: Do committed progenitors work while stem cells sleep? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9:82-88
74. Smith GH. 2005. Label-retaining epithelial cells in mouse mammary gland divide asymmetrically and retain their template DNA strands. Development 132:681-87
75. Faulkin LJ Jr, DeOme KB. 1960. Regulation of growth and spacing of gland elements in the mammary fat pad of the C3H mouse. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 24:953-69
76. Daniel CW, Young LJ, Medina D, De Ome KB. 1971. The influence of mammogenic hormones on serially transplanted mouse mammary gland. Exp. Gerontol. 6:95-101
77. Smith GH, Medina D. 1988. A morphologically distinct candidate for an epithelial stem cell in mouse mammary gland. J. Cell Sci. 90:173-84
78. Smith GH. 1996. Experimental mammary epithelial morphogenesis in an in vivo model: evidence for distinct cellular progenitors of the ductal and lobular phenotype. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 39:21-31
79. Kordon EC, Smith GH. 1998. An entire functional mammary gland may comprise the progeny from a single cell. Development 125:1921-30
80. Shackleton M, Vaillant F, Simpson KJ, Stingl J, Smyth GK, et al. 2006. Generation of a functional mammary gland from a single stem cell. Nature 439:84-88
81. Chepko G, Smith GH. 1997. Three division-competent, structurally-distinct cell populations contribute to murine mammary epithelial renewal. Tissue Cell 29:239-53
82. Ferguson DJ. 1985. Ultrastructural characterisation of the proliferative (stem) cells within the parenchyma of the normal "resting" breast. Virchows Arch. 407:379-85
83. Li P, Wilde CJ, FinchLM,FernigDG, Rudland PS. 1999. Identification of cell types in the developing goat mammary gland. Histochem. J. 31:379-93
84. Ellis S, Edwards FG, Akers RM. 1995. Morphological and histological analysis of the prepubertal ovine mammary gland. J. Dairy Sci. 78(Suppl. 1):157
85. Ellis S, Purup S, Sejrsen K, Akers RM. 2000. Growth and morphogenesis of epithelial cell organoids from peripheral and medial mammary parenchyma of prepubertal heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 83:952-61
86. Ellis S, Capuco AV. 2002. Cell proliferation in bovinemammaryepithelium: identification of the primary proliferative cell population. Tissue Cell 34:155-63
87. Motyl T, Bierla JB, Kozlowski M, Gajewska M, Gajkowska B, Koronkiewicz M. 2011. Identification, quantification and transcriptional profile of potential stem cells in bovine mammary gland. Livest. Sci. 136:136-49
88. Kenney NJ, Smith GH, Lawrence E, Barrett JC, Salomon DS. 2001. Identification of stem cell units in the terminal end bud and duct of the mouse mammary gland. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 1:133-43
89. Welm BE, Tepera SB, Venezia T, Graubert TA, Rosen JM, Goodell MA. 2002. Sca-1pos cells in the mouse mammary gland represent an enriched progenitor cell population. Dev. Biol. 245:42-56
90. Capuco AV. 2007. Identification of putative bovine mammary epithelial stem cells by their retention of labeled DNA strands. Exp. Biol. Med. 232:1381-90
91. Cairns J. 1975. Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer. Nature 255:197-200
92. Klein AM, Simons BD. 2011. Universal patterns of stem cell fate in cycling adult tissues. Development 138:3103-11
93. Stingl J, Eirew P, Ricketson I, Shackleton M, Vaillant F, et al. 2006. Purification and unique properties of mammary epithelial stem cells. Nature 439:993-97
94. Asselin-Labat ML, Shackleton M, Stingl J, Vaillant F, Forrest NC, et al. 2006. Steroid hormone receptor status of mouse mammary stem cells. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 98:1011-14
95. Sleeman KE, Kendrick H, Ashworth A, Isacke CM, Smalley MJ. 2006. CD24 staining of mouse mammary gland cells defines luminal epithelial, myoepithelial/basal and non-epithelial cells. Breast Cancer Res. 8:R7
96. Sleeman KE, Kendrick H, Robertson D, Isacke CM, Ashworth A, Smalley MJ. 2007. Dissociation of estrogen receptor expression and in vivo stem cell activity in the mammary gland. J. Cell Biol. 176:19-26
97. Van Keymeulen A, Rocha AS, Ousset M, Beck B, Bouvencourt G, et al. 2011. Distinct stem cells contribute to mammary gland development and maintenance. Nature 479:189-93
98. Bai L, Rohrschneider LR. 2010. s-SHIP promoter expression marks activated stem cells in developing mouse mammary tissue. Genes Dev. 24:1882-92
99. Boulanger CA, Wagner KU, Smith GH. 2005. Parity-induced mouse mammary epithelial cells are pluripotent, self-renewing and sensitive to TGF-b1 expression. Oncogene 24:552-60
100. Smith GH, Chepko G. 2001. Mammary epithelial stem cells. Microsc. Res. Tech. 52:190-203
101. Brisken C, Duss S. 2007. Stem cells and the stem cell niche in the breast: an integrated hormonal and developmental perspective. Stem Cell Rev. 3:147-56
102. Booth BW, Mack DL, Androutsellis-Theotokis A, McKay RD, Boulanger CA, Smith GH. 2008. The mammary microenvironment alters the differentiation repertoire of neural stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:14891-96
103. Boulanger CA, Mack DL, Booth BW, Smith GH. 2007. Interaction with the mammary microenvironment redirects spermatogenic cell fate in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:3871-76
104. Taddei I, DeugnierMA, FaraldoMM,Petit V, Bouvard D, et al. 2008. b1 integrin deletion from the basal compartment of the mammary epithelium affects stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 10:716-22
105. Mallepell S, Krust A, Chambon P, Brisken C. 2006. Paracrine signaling through the epithelial estrogen receptor a is required for proliferation and morphogenesis in the mammary gland. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:2196-201
106. Dontu G, Abdallah WM, Foley JM, Jackson KW, Clarke MF, et al. 2003. In vitro propagation and transcriptional profiling of human mammary stem/progenitor cells. Genes Dev. 17:1253-70
107. Martignani E, Eirew P, Eaves C, Baratta M. 2009. Functional identification of bovine mammary epithelial stem/progenitor cells. Vet. Res. Commun. 33(Suppl. 1):101-3
108. Rauner G, Barash I. 2012. Cell hierarchy and lineage commitment in the bovine mammary gland. PLoS ONE 7:e30113
109. Holland MS, Holland RE. 2005. The cellular perspective on mammary gland development: stem/progenitor cells and beyond. J. Dairy Sci. 88(Suppl. 1):E1-8
110. Kuperwasser C, Chavarria T, Wu M, Magrane G, Gray JW, et al. 2004. Reconstruction of functionally normal and malignant human breast tissues in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:4966-71
111. Martignani E, Eirew P, Accornero P, Eaves CJ, Baratta M. 2010. Human milk protein production in xenografts of genetically engineered bovine mammary epithelial stem cells. PLoS ONE 5:e13372
112. Ginestier C, Hur MH, Charafe-Jauffret E, Monville F, Dutcher J, et al. 2007. ALDH1 is a marker of normal and malignant human mammary stem cells and a predictor of poor clinical outcome. Cell Stem Cell 1:555-67
113. Liu S, Ginestier C, Charafe-Jauffret E, Foco H, Kleer CG, et al. 2008. BRCA1 regulates human mammary stem/progenitor cell fate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:1680-85
114. Eirew P, Stingl J, Raouf A, Turashvili G, Aparicio S, et al. 2008.Amethod for quantifying normal human mammary epithelial stem cells with in vivo regenerative ability. Nat. Med. 14:1384-89
115. Villadsen R, Fridriksdottir AJ, Rønnov-Jessen L, Gudjonsson T, Rank F, et al. 2007. Evidence for a stem cell hierarchy in the adult human breast. J. Cell Biol. 177:87-101
116. Capuco AV, Evock-Clover CM, Minuti A, Wood DL. 2009. In vivo expansion of the mammary stem/progenitor cell population by xanthosine infusion. Exp. Biol. Med. 234:475-82
117. Capuco AV, Dahl GE, Wood DL, Moallem U, Erdman RE. 2004. Effect of bovine somatotropin and rumen-undegradable protein on mammary growth of prepubertal dairy heifers and subsequent milk production. J. Dairy Sci. 87:3762-69
118. Lamarca HL, Rosen JM. 2008. Hormones and mammary cell fate-What will I become when I grow up? Endocrinology 149:4317-21
119. Dontu G, El-Ashry D, Wicha MS. 2004. Breast cancer, stem/progenitor cells and the estrogen receptor. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 15:193-97
120. Niku M, Ilmonen L, Pessa-Morikawa T, Iivanainen A. 2004. Limited contribution of circulating cells to the development and maintenance of nonhematopoietic bovine tissues. Stem Cells 22:12-20
121. Levi BP, Yilmaz-OH, Duester G, Morrison SJ. 2009. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1a1 is dispensable for stem cell function in the mouse hematopoietic and nervous systems. Blood 113:1670-80
122. Choudhary RK, Li RW, Evock-Clover CM, Capuco AV. 2013. Comparison of the transcriptomes of long-term label-retaining cells and control cells microdissected from mammary epithelium: an initial study to characterize potential stem/progenitor cells. Front. Oncol. In press. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00021
123. Boulanger CA, Smith GH. 2009. Reprogramming cell fates in the mammary microenvironment. Cell Cycle 8:1127-32
124. Heng JC, Feng B, Han J, Jiang J, Kraus P, et al. 2010. The nuclear receptor Nr5a2 can replace Oct4 in the reprogramming of murine somatic cells to pluripotent cells. Cell Stem Cell 6:167-74
125. Savarese F, Flahndorfer K, Jaenisch R, Busslinger M, Wutz A. 2006. Hematopoietic precursor cells transiently reestablish permissiveness for X inactivation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:7167-77
126. Lagarkova MA, Shutova MV, Bogomazova AN, Vassina EM, Glazov EA, et al. 2010. Induction of pluripotency in human endothelial cells resets epigenetic profile on genome scale. Cell Cycle 9: 937-46
127. Prpar S, Martignani E, Dovc P, Baratta M. 2012. Identification of goat mammary stem/progenitor cells. Biol. Reprod. 86:117
128. Colitti M, Farinacci M. 2009. Expression of a putative stem cell marker, Musashi 1, in mammary glands of ewes. J. Mol. Histol. 40:139-49
129. Colitti M. 2010. Expression of putative stem cell markers related to developmental stage of sheep mammary glands. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 39:555-62
130. Booth BW, Boulanger CA, Smith GH.2007. Alveolar progenitor cells develop in mousemammaryglands independent of pregnancy and lactation. J. Cell. Physiol. 212:729-36
131. Booth BW, Boulanger CA, Anderson LH, Jimenez-Rojo L, Brisken C, Smith GH. 2009. Amphiregulin mediates self-renewal in an immortalmammaryepithelial cell line with stem cell characteristics. Exp. Cell Res. 316:422-32
132. Raghuvanshi S, Sharma P, Singh S, Van Kaer L, Das G. 2010. Mycobacterium tuberculosis evades host immunity by recruiting mesenchymal stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:21653-58
133. Lindvall C, Evans NC, Zylstra CR, Li Y, Alexander CM, Williams BO. 2006. The Wnt signaling receptor Lrp5 is required for mammary ductal stem cell activity and Wnt1-induced tumorigenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 281:35081-87
134. Sherley JL. 2002. Asymmetric cell kinetics genes: the key to expansion of adult stem cells in culture. Stem Cells 20:561-72
135. Bouras T, Pal B, Vaillant F, Harburg G, Asselin-Labat ML, et al. 2008. Notch signaling regulates mammary stem cell function and luminal cell-fate commitment. Cell Stem Cell 3:429-41
136. Cicalese A, Bonizzi G, Pasi CE, Faretta M, Ronzoni S, et al. 2009. The tumor suppressor p53 regulates polarity of self-renewing divisions in mammary stem cells. Cell 138:1083-95
137. Rambhatla L, Ram-Mohan S, Cheng JJ, Sherley JL. 2005. Immortal DNA strand cosegregation requires p53/IMPDH-dependent asymmetric self-renewal associated with adult stem cells. Cancer Res. 65:3155-61
138. Sherley JL, Stadler PB, Johnson DR. 1995. Expression of the wild-type p53 antioncogene induces guanine nucleotide-dependent stem cell division kinetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:136-40
139. Huh YH, King J, Cohen J, Sherley JL. 2011. SACK-expanded hair follicle stem cells display asymmetric nuclear Lgr5 expression with non-random sister chromatid segregation. Sci. Rep. 1:176
140. Noh M, Smith JL, Huh YH, Sherley JL. 2011. A resource for discovering specific and universal biomarkers for distributed stem cells. PLoS ONE 6:e22077
141. Lee HS, Crane GG, Merok JR, Tunstead JR, Hatch NL, et al. 2003. Clonal expansion of adult rat hepatic stem cell lines by suppression of asymmetric cell kinetics (SACK). Biotechnol. Bioeng. 83:760-77
142. Choudhary RK, Capuco AV. 2012. In vitro expansion of the mammary stem/progenitor cell population by xanthosine treatment. BMC Cell Biol. 13:14
143. Baldassarre H, Deslauriers J, Neveu N, Bordignon V. 2011. Detection of endoplasmic reticulum stress markers and production enhancement treatments in transgenic goats expressing recombinant human butyrylcholinesterase. Transgenic Res. 20:1265-72