Hierarchy in political discussion

Political Communication

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 137-152

  Richey, Sean ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hierarchy; Japan; Political discussion; Social networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449580777     PISSN: 10584609     EISSN: 10917675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10584600902851419     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ackerman, B., & Fishkin, J. S. (2004). Deliberation day. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2. Barabas, J. (2004). How deliberation affects policy opinions. American Political Science Review, 98, 687-701.
3. Bartels, L. M. (1996). Uninformed votes: Information effects in presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 194-230.
4. Bartels, L. M. (2005). Homer gets a tax cut: Inequality and public policy in the American mind. Perspectives on Politics, 3, 15-31.
5. Beck, P. A., Dalton, R. J., Greene, S., & Huckfeldt, R. (2002). The social calculus of voting: Interpersonal, media, and organizational influences on presidential choices. American Political Science Review, 96, 57-73.
6. Ben-Ami, D. (1997). Is Japan different? In P. Hammond (Ed.), Cultural difference, media memories: Anglo-American images of Japan (pp. 5-24). Washington, DC: Cassell.
7. Benedict, R. (1946). The chrysanthemum and the sword: Patterns of Japanese culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
8. Bennett, S. E., Flickinger, R. S., & Rhine, S. L. (2000). Political talk over here, over there, over time. British Journal of Political Science, 30, 99-120.
9. Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954) Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. Brosius, H.-B., & Weimann, G. (1996). Who sets the agenda? Agenda-setting as a two-step flow. Communication Research, 23, 562-581.
11. Burt, R. S. (1984). Network items and the General Social Survey. Social Networks, 6, 293-339.
12. Conover, P. J., Searing, D. D., & Crewe, I. M. (2002). The deliberative potential of political discussion. British Journal of Political Science, 32, 21-62.
13. Cooke, M. (2000). Five arguments for deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 48, 947-969.
14. Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15. Druckman, J. N. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir)rele-vance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98, 671-686.
16. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Rows, Peterson & Co.
17. Gastil, J., Dillard, J. (1999). Increasing political sophistication through public deliberation. Political Communication, 16, 3-23.
18. Grofman, B. N., Owen, G., & Feld, S. L. (1983). Thirteen theorems in search of the truth. Theory and Decision, 15, 261-278.
19. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
20. Huckfeldt, R. (2001). The social communication of political expertise. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 425-438.
21. Huckfeldt, R., Ikeda, K. S. & Pappi, F. (2005). Patterns of disagreement in democratic politics: Comparing Germany, Japan, and the United States. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 497-514.
22. Huckfeldt, R. Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. D. (2004). Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Huckfeldt, R. Sprague, J., & Levine, J. (2000). The dynamics of collective deliberation in the 1996 election: Campaign effects on accessibility, certainty, and accuracy. American Political Science Review, 94, 641-651.
24. Ikeda, K. (2007). Political reality and social psychology: The dynamics of the Koizumi years. Tokyo: Bokutaku-sha.
25. Ikeda, K., & Huckfeldt, R. (2001). Political communication and disagreement among citizens in Japan and the United States. Political Behavior, 23, 23-51.
26. Ikeda, K., & Richey, S. E. (2005). Japanese network capital: The impact of social networks on Japanese political participation. Political Behavior, 27, 239-260.
27. Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Personal influence. New York: Free Press.
28. King, C., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 347-361.
29. Lazarsfeld, P. Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people's choice. New York: Columbia University Press.
30. Leib, E. J. (2004). Deliberative democracy in America: A proposal for a popular branch of government. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
31. LeTendre, G. (1994). Guiding them on: Teaching, hierarchy, and social organization in Japanese middle schools. Journal of Japanese Studies, 20, 37-59.
32. Levine, J. (2005). Choosing alone: The social network basis of modern political choice. In A. S. Zuckerman (Ed.), The social logic of politics: Personal networks as contexts for political behavior (pp. 132-151). Philadephia: Temple University Press.
33. Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (2000). The institutional foundations of political competence: How citizens learn what they need to know. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbin, & S. L. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of reason. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. Marin, A., & Hampton, K. N. (2007). Simplifying the personal network name generator: Alternatives to traditional multiple and single name generators. Field Methods, 19, 163-193.
35. Maruyama, M. (1961) Nihon no shiso [Japanese thought]. Tokyo: Iwanami syoten.
36. Mutz, D. C. (2002). Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review, 96, 111-126.
37. Nakane, C. (1972). Japanese society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
38. Neuman, W. R. (1986). The paradox of mass politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. Popkin, S. (1991). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Price, V., Cappella, J. N., & Nir, L. (2002). Does disagreement contribute to more deliberative opinion? Political Communication, 19, 95-112.
41. Richardson, B. M. (1991). The Japanese voter. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
42. Richardson, B. (1997). Japanese democracy: Power coordination and performance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43. Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2004). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. Sugimoto, Y. (2003). An introduction to Japanese society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45. Weimann, G. (1994). The influentials: People who influence people. New York: State University of New York Press.
46. Woodbridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Zuckerman, A. S. (2005). Returning to the social logic of politics. In A. S. Zuckerman (Ed.), The social logic of politics: Personal networks as contexts for political behavior (pp. 3-20). Philadephia: Temple University Press.