Quantile hydrologic model selection and model structure deficiency assessment: 2. Applications

Water Resources Research

Volumn 49, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 5658-5673

  Pande, Saket ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

model structure deficiency; quantile model selection; uncertainty

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; CLIMATE MODELS; FORECASTING; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; MODEL STRUCTURES; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WATERSHEDS;

ASYMMETRIC LOSS FUNCTION; HYDROLOGIC MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; OVERLAPPING INFORMATION; QUANTILE MODELS; STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT; UNCERTAINTY;

PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS;

BASEFLOW; DATA SET; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; INTERCEPTION; OVERLAND FLOW; PREDICTION; RIVER BASIN; STREAMFLOW;

FRENCH BROAD RIVER; GUADALUPE BASIN; INDIA; TEXAS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84884172344     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: 19447973     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wrcr.20422     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Blazkova, S., and, K. Beven, (2009), A limits of acceptability approach to model evaluation and uncertainty estimation in flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation: Skalka catchment, Czech Republic, Water Resour. Res., 45, W00B16, doi: 10.1029/2007WR006726.
2. Burnash, R. J. C., (1995), The NWS river forecast system-catchment modelling, in Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, edited by, V. P. Singh, pp. 311-366, Water Resour. Publ., Highlands Ranch, Colo.
3. Clark, M. P., A. G. Slater, D. E. Rupp, R. A. Woods, J. A. Vrugt, H. V. Gupta, T. Wagener, and, L. E. Hay, (2008), Framework for Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE): A modular framework to diagnose differences between hydrological models, Water Resour. Res., 44, W00B02, doi: 10.1029/2007WR006735.
4. Duan, Q., S. Sorooshian, and, V. Gupta, (1992), Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models, Water Resour. Res., 28 (4), 1015-1031, doi: 10.1029/91WR02985.
5. Duan, Q., et al. (2006), The Model Parameter Estimation Experiment (MOPEX): An overview of science strategy and major results from the second and third workshops, J. Hydrol., 320, 3-17, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.031.
6. GAMS (2008), GAMS-A user's guide: Tutorial by Richard E. Rosenthal, p. 273, GAMS Dev. Corp., Washington, D. C.
7. Keyzer, M. A., and, S. Pande, (2009), Instrumentalization using quantiles in semiparametric support vector regression, Cent. World Food Stud. Working Pap. WP 09-04, 61 pp., Stichting Onderzoek Wereldvoedsel-voorziening van de Vrije Universiteit (SOW-VU), Amsterdam.
8. Koenker, R., (2005), Quantile Regression, Econ. Soc. Monogr. Ser., vol. 38, 366 pp., Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, NY.
9. Koenker, R., and, G. Basset, (1978), Regression quantiles, Econometrica, 46 (1), 33-50.
10. Ma, L., and, R. Koenker, (2006), Quantile regression methods for recursive structural equation models, J. Econ., 134, 471-506.
11. Moore, R. J., (1985), Probability-distributed principle and runoff production at point and basin scales, Hydrol. Sci. J., 30, 273-297.
12. Pande, S., (2013), Quantile hydrologic model selection and model structure deficiency assessment: 1. Theory, Water Resour. Res., 49, doi: 10.1002/wrcr.20411.
13. Pande, S., M. McKee, and, L. A. Bastidas, (2009), Complexity-based robust hydrologic prediction, Water Resour. Res., 45, W10406, doi: 10.1029/2008WR007524.
14. Pande, S., H. H. G. Savenije, L. A. Bastidas, and, A. K. Gosain, (2010), A parsimonious modeling approach to water management in dryland areas, in S. Khan, H. H. G. Savenije, S. Demuth and P. Hubert, eds., Hydrocomplexity: New Tools for Solving Wicked Water Problems, vol. 338, Int. Assoc. of Hydrol. Sci. Publ., IAHS Press, Wallingford, U. K.
15. Pande, S., B. van den Boom, H. H. G. Savenije, and, A. K. Gosain, (2011), Water valuation at basin scale with application to western India, Ecol. Econ., 70, 2416-2428, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.025.
16. Pande, S., H. H. G. Savenije, L. A. Bastidas, and, A. K. Gosain, (2012a), A parsimonious hydrological model for a data scarce dryland region, Water Resour. Manage., 26, 909-926, doi: 10.1007/s11269-011-9816-z.
17. Pande, S., L. A. Bastidas, S. Bhulai, and, M. McKee, (2012b), Parameter dependent convergence bounds and complexity measure for a class of conceptual hydrological models, J. Hydroinformatics 14 (2), 443-463.
18. Schoups, G., and, J. A. Vrugt, (2010), A formal likelihood function for parameter and predictive inference of hydrologic models with correlated, heteroscedastic, and non-Gaussian errors, Water Resour. Res., 46, W10531, doi: 10.1029/2009WR008933.
19. Son, K., and, M. Sivapalan, (2007), Improving model structure and reducing parameter uncertainty in conceptual water balance models through the use of auxiliary data, Water Resour. Res., 43, W01415, doi: 10.1029/ 2006WR005032.
20. Tiwari, V. M., J. Wahr, and, S. Swenson, (2009), Dwindling groundwater resources in northern India, from satellite gravity observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L18401, doi: 10.1029/2009GL039401.
21. Vapnik, V., (2002), The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, 2nd ed., Springer, New York.
22. Weerts, A. H., H. C. Winsemius, and, J. S. Verkade, (2011), Estimation of predictive hydrological uncertainty using quantile regression: Examples from the National Flood Forecasting System (England and Wales), Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 255-265.
23. Westerberg, I. K., J.-L. Guerrero, P. M. Younger, K. J. Beven, J. Seibert, S. Halldin, J. E. Freer, and, C.-Y. Xu, (2011), Calibration of hydrological models using flow duration curves, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2205-2227.
24. Yu, P.-S., and, T.-C. Yang, (2000), Using synthetic flow duration curves for rainfall-runoff model calibration at ungauged sites, Hydrol. Processes, 14, 117-133.