Structural patterns of the proximal femur in relation to age and hip fracture risk in women

Bone

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 290-299

  Carballido Gamio, Julio ^a   Harnish, Roy ^a   Saeed, Isra ^a   Streeper, Timothy ^a   Sigurdsson, Sigurdur ^b   Amin, Shreyasee ^c,d   Atkinson, Elizabeth J ^c   Therneau, Terry M ^c   Siggeirsdottir, Kristin ^b   Cheng, Xiaoguang ^e   Melton, L Joseph ^c,d   Keyak, Joyce H ^f   Gudnason, Vilmundur ^b,g   Khosla, Sundeep ^d   Harris, Tamara B ^h   Lang, Thomas F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b ICELANDIC HEART ASSOCIATION   (Iceland)

^c Mayo Clinic   (United States)

^d MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^e Jishuitan Orthopaedic College of Tsinghua University   (China)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

^h NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING   (United States)

Author keywords

Age; Fracture; Osteoporosis; Proximal femur; Statistical parametric mapping; Tensor based morphometry (TBM)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY WEIGHT; BONE CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; BONE CONTRACTION; BONE DENSITY; BONE EXPANSION; BONE MASS; BONE STRUCTURE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LEG; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORPHOMETRICS; POPULATION RESEARCH; PREDICTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; STUDENT T TEST; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRABECULAR BONE;

AGE; FRACTURE; OSTEOPOROSIS; PROXIMAL FEMUR; STATISTICAL PARAMETRIC MAPPING; TENSOR-BASED MORPHOMETRY (TBM);

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE DENSITY; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP FRACTURES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS; RISK FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84884138372     PISSN: 87563282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.08.017     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Riggs B.L., Melton Iii L.J., Robb R.A., Camp J.J., Atkinson E.J., Peterson J.M., et al. Population-based study of age and sex differences in bone volumetric density, size, geometry, and structure at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 2004, 19:1945-1954.
2. Mayhew P.M., Thomas C.D., Clement J.G., Loveridge N., Beck T.J., Bonfield W., et al. Relation between age, femoral neck cortical stability, and hip fracture risk. Lancet 2005, 366:129-135.
3. Meta M., Lu Y., Keyak J.H., Lang T. Young-elderly differences in bone density, geometry and strength indices depend on proximal femur sub-region: a cross sectional study in Caucasian-American women. Bone 2006, 39:152-158.
4. Ito M., Wakao N., Hida T., Matsui Y., Abe Y., Aoyagi K., et al. Analysis of hip geometry by clinical CT for the assessment of hip fracture risk in elderly Japanese women. Bone 2010, 46:453-457.
5. Poole K.E., Mayhew P.M., Rose C.M., Brown J.K., Bearcroft P.J., Loveridge N., et al. Changing structure of the femoral neck across the adult female lifespan. J Bone Miner Res 2010, 25:482-491.
6. Li W., Kornak J., Harris T., Keyak J., Li C., Lu Y., et al. Identify fracture-critical regions inside the proximal femur using statistical parametric mapping. Bone 2009, 44:596-602.
7. Keyak J.H., Sigurdsson S., Karlsdottir G., Oskarsdottir D., Sigmarsdottir A., Zhao S., et al. Male-female differences in the association between incident hip fracture and proximal femoral strength: a finite element analysis study. Bone 2011, 48:1239-1245.
8. Poole K.E., Treece G.M., Mayhew P.M., Vaculik J., Dungl P., Horak M., et al. Cortical thickness mapping to identify focal osteoporosis in patients with hip fracture. PLoS One 2012, 7:e38466.
9. Kerr R., Resnick D., Sartoris D.J., Kursunoglu S., Pineda C., Haghighi P., et al. Computerized tomography of proximal femoral trabecular patterns. J Orthop Res 1986, 4:45-56.
10. Elke R.P., Cheal E.J., Simmons C., Poss R. Three-dimensional anatomy of the cancellous structures within the proximal femur from computed tomography data. J Orthop Res 1995, 13:513-523.
11. Davatzikos C., Vaillant M., Resnick S.M., Prince J.L., Letovsky S., Bryan R.N. A computerized approach for morphological analysis of the corpus callosum. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996, 20:88-97.
12. Sigurdsson G., Aspelund T., Chang M., Jonsdottir B., Sigurdsson S., Eiriksdottir G., et al. Increasing sex difference in bone strength in old age: The Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik study (AGES-REYKJAVIK). Bone 2006, 39:644-651.
13. Carballido-Gamio J., Harnish R., Saeed I., Streeper T., Siggurdsson S., Amin S., et al. Proximal femoral density distribution and structure in relation to age and hip fracture risk in women. J Bone Miner Res 2012, 28:537-546.
14. Siggeirsdottir K., Aspelund T., Sigurdsson G., Mogensen B., Chang M., Jonsdottir B., et al. Inaccuracy in self-report of fractures may underestimate association with health outcomes when compared with medical record based fracture registry. Eur J Epidemiol 2007, 22:631-639.
15. Harris T.B., Launer L.J., Eiriksdottir G., Kjartansson O., Jonsson P.V., Sigurdsson G., et al. Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik study: multidisciplinary applied phenomics. Am J Epidemiol 2007, 165:1076-1087.
16. A system for the analysis of whole-bone strength from helical CT images 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging. J.J. Camp, R.A. Karwoski, M.C. Stacy, E.J. Atkinson, S. Khosla, L.J. Melton Iii (Eds.).
17. Cheng X., Li J., Lu Y., Keyak J., Lang T. Proximal femoral density and geometry measurements by quantitative computed tomography: association with hip fracture. Bone 2007, 40:169-174.
18. Black D.M., Bouxsein M.L., Marshall L.M., Cummings S.R., Lang T.F., Cauley J.A., et al. Proximal femoral structure and the prediction of hip fracture in men: a large prospective study using QCT. J Bone Miner Res 2008, 23:1326-1333.
19. Lang T., LeBlanc A., Evans H., Lu Y., Genant H., Yu A. Cortical and trabecular bone mineral loss from the spine and hip in long-duration spaceflight. J Bone Miner Res 2004, 19:1006-1012.
20. Keyak J.H., Rossi S.A., Jones K.A., Skinner H.B. Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. J Biomech 1998, 31:125-133.
21. Vercauteren T., Pennec X., Perchant A., Ayache N. Non-parametric diffeomorphic image registration with the demons algorithm. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2007, 10:319-326.
22. Reinertsen I., Descoteaux M., Drouin S., Siddiqi K., Collins D.L. Vessel driven correction of brain shift. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2004, 3217:208-216.
23. Suh J.W., Wyatt C.L. Deformable registration of prone and supine colons for CT colonography. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006, 1:1997-2000.
24. Fritscher K., Grunerbl A., Hanni M., Suhm N., Hengg C., Schubert R. Trabecular bone analysis in CT and X-ray images of the proximal femur for the assessment of local bone quality. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009, 28:1560-1575.
25. Hua X., Leow A.D., Levitt J.G., Caplan R., Thompson P.M., Toga A.W. Detecting brain growth patterns in normal children using tensor-based morphometry. Hum Brain Mapp 2009, 30:209-219.
26. Hua X., Leow A.D., Parikshak N., Lee S., Chiang M.C., Toga A.W., et al. Tensor-based morphometry as a neuroimaging biomarker for Alzheimer's disease: an MRI study of 676AD, MCI, and normal subjects. Neuroimage 2008, 43:458-469.
27. Brun C.C., Lepore N., Pennec X., Lee A.D., Barysheva M., Madsen S.K., et al. Mapping the regional influence of genetics on brain structure variability-a tensor-based morphometry study. Neuroimage 2009, 48:37-49.
28. Rajagopalan V., Scott J., Habas P.A., Kim K., Corbett-Detig J., Rousseau F., et al. Local tissue growth patterns underlying normal fetal human brain gyrification quantified in utero. J Neurosci 2011, 31:2878-2887.
29. Lepore N., Brun C., Chou Y.Y., Chiang M.C., Dutton R.A., Hayashi K.M., et al. Generalized tensor-based morphometry of HIV/AIDS using multivariate statistics on deformation tensors. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2008, 27:129-141.
30. Ashburner J., Friston K.J. Voxel-based morphometry-the methods. Neuroimage 2000, 11:805-821.
31. Mechelli A., Price C.J., Friston K.J., Ashburner J. Voxel-based morphometry of the human brain: methods and applications. Curr Med Imaging Rev 2005, 1:105-113.
32. Multi scale image and multi scale deformation of brain anatomy for building average brain atlases 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging. C. Studholme, V. Cardenas, M. Weiner (Eds.).
33. Chung M.K., Dalton K.M., Alexander A.L., Davidson R.J. Less white matter concentration in autism: 2D voxel-based morphometry. Neuroimage 2004, 23:242-251.
34. Campbell L.E., Daly E., Toal F., Stevens A., Azuma R., Catani M., et al. Brain and behaviour in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: a volumetric and voxel-based morphometry MRI study. Brain 2006, 129:1218-1228.
35. Barnes J., Ridgway G.R., Bartlett J., Henley S.M., Lehmann M., Hobbs N., et al. Head size, age and gender adjustment in MRI studies: a necessary nuisance?. Neuroimage 2010, 53:1244-1255.
36. Genovese C.R., Lazar N.A., Nichols T. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage 2002, 15:870-878.
37. Lang T.F., Sigurdsson S., Karlsdottir G., Oskarsdottir D., Sigmarsdottir A., Chengshi J., et al. Age-related loss of proximal femoral strength in elderly men and women: the Age Gene/Environment Susceptibility study-Reykjavik. Bone 2012, 50:743-748.
38. Johannesdottir F., Poole K.E., Reeve J., Siggeirsdottir K., Aspelund T., Mogensen B., et al. Distribution of cortical bone in the femoral neck and hip fracture: a prospective case-control analysis of 143 incident hip fractures; the AGES-REYKJAVIK study. Bone 2011, 48:1268-1276.
39. Hip fracture risk estimation based on principal component analysis of QCT atlas: a preliminary study 2009, SPIE Medical Imaging. W. Li, J. Kornak, T. Harris, Y. Lu, X. Cheng, T. Lang (Eds.).
40. Schuler B., Fritscher K.D., Kuhn V., Eckstein F., Link T.M., Schubert R. Assessment of the individual fracture risk of the proximal femur by using statistical appearance models. Med Phys 2010, 37:2560-2571.
41. Whitmarsh T., Fritscher K.D., Humbert L., Del Rio Barquero L.M., Roth T., Kammerlander C., et al. A statistical model of shape and bone mineral density distribution of the proximal femur for fracture risk assessment. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2011, 14:393-400.
42. Li W., Kornak J., Harris T.B., Keyak J., Li C., Lu Y., et al. Bone fracture risk estimation based on image similarity. Bone 2009, 45:560-567.
43. Baker-LePain J.C., Luker K.R., Lynch J.A., Parimi N., Nevitt M.C., Lane N.E. Active shape modeling of the hip in the prediction of incident hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res 2011, 26:468-474.