A statistical model of shape and bone mineral density distribution of the proximal femur for fracture risk assessment

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6892 LNCS, Issue PART 2, 2011, Pages 393-400

  Whitmarsh, Tristan ^a   Fritscher, Karl D ^b   Humbert, Ludovic ^a   Del Rio Barquero, Luís Miguel ^c   Roth, Tobias ^d   Kammerlander, Christian ^d   Blauth, Michael ^d   Schubert, Rainer ^b   Frangi, Alejandro F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY FOR HEALTH SCIENCES   (Austria)

^c CETIR Centre Medic   (Spain)

^d INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE MINERAL DENSITY; CLASS SEPARATION; CLINICAL PRACTICES; CONTROL GROUPS; DATA SETS; DENSITY MODELS; DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FISHER CRITERION; FISHER LINEAR DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FRACTURE RISKS; INPUT DATAS; MAIN MODE; MODEL PARAMETERS; PARALLEL ANALYSIS; PARAMETER SPACES; PROXIMAL FEMUR; QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIES; STATISTICAL MODELS;

BONE; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FACE RECOGNITION; FEATURE EXTRACTION; FRACTURE; MEDICAL COMPUTING; MEDICAL IMAGING; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RISK PERCEPTION; SEPARATION; SILICATE MINERALS; TOMOGRAPHY;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; FEMUR NECK; FRACTURE HEALING; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ADULT; ALGORITHMS; BONE DENSITY; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; FEMORAL FRACTURES; FEMUR NECK; FRACTURE HEALING; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 82255183602     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23629-7_48     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Schuler, B., Fritscher, K.D., Kuhn, V., Eckstein, F., Link, T.M., Schubert, R.: Assessment of the individual fracture risk of the proximal femur by using statistical appearance models. Medical Physics 37(6), 2560-2571 (2010)
2. Bousson, V., Adams, J., Engelke, K., Aout, M., Cohen-Solal, M., Bergot, C., Haguenauer, D., Goldberg, D., Champion, K., Aksouh, R., Vicaut, E., Laredo, J.: In vivo discrimination of hip fracture with quantitative computed tomography: Results from the prospective European Femur Fracture Study (EFFECT). Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 26(4), 881-893 (2010)
3. Li, W., Kornak, J., Harris, T., Lu, Y., Cheng, X., Lang, T.: Hip fracture risk estimation based on principal component analysis of QCT atlas: a preliminary study. In: Medical Imaging 2009: Biomedical Applications in Molecular, Structural, and Functional Imaging, p. 72621M. SPIE, San Jose (2009)
4. Ito, M., Wakao, N., Hida, T., Matsui, Y., Abe, Y., Aoyagi, K., Uetani, M., Harada, A.: Analysis of hip geometry by clinical CT for the assessment of hip fracture risk in elderly Japanese women. Bone 46(2), 453-457 (2010)
5. Horn, J.: A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika 30(2), 179-185 (1965)
6. Faulkner, K., Genant, H., McClung, M.: Bilateral comparison of femoral bone density and hip axis length from single and fan beam DXA scans. Calcified Tissue International 56, 26-31 (1995)
7. Ruegsegger, P., Kalender,W.A.: A phantom for standardization and quality control in peripheral bone measurements by PQCT and DXA. Physics in Medicine and Biology 38(12), 1963-1970 (1993)
8. Fujii, Y., Tsunenari, T., Tsutsumi, M., Miyauchi, A., Yamada, H., Fukase, M., Yoshimoto, Y., Okuno, Y., Kusakabe, H., Miyoshi, K., Fukunaga, M., Morita, R., Fujita, T.: Quantitative computed tomography: Comparison of two calibration phantoms. Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism 6, 17-20 (1988)
9. Suzuki, S., Yamamuro, T., Okumura, H., Yamamoto, I.: Quantitative computed tomography: comparative study using different scanners with two calibration phantoms. British Journal of Radiology 64(767), 1001-1006 (1991)
10. Genant, H.K., Grampp, S., Glüer, C.C., Faulkner, K.G., Jergas, M., Engelke, K., Hagiwara, S., van Kuijk, C.: Universal standardization for dual X-ray absorptiometry: Patient and phantom cross-calibration results. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 9(10), 1503-1514 (1994)