Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery

Breast

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 698-702

  Yu, Chi Chang ^a   Chiang, Kun Chun ^a   Kuo, Wen Lin ^a   Shen, Shih Che ^a   Lo, Yung Feng ^a   Chen, Shin Cheh ^a  

^a CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast conserving surgery; Positive margins; Re excision; Ultrasound guided

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL FEATURE; ECHOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE GUIDED BIOPSY; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR INVASION; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; TUMOR VOLUME; ULTRASOUND GUIDED BREAST CONSERVING SURGERY;

BREAST CANCER; BREAST-CONSERVING SURGERY; POSITIVE MARGINS; RE-EXCISION; ULTRASOUND-GUIDED;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; FEMALE; FROZEN SECTIONS; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84884130689     PISSN: 09609776     EISSN: 15323080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.12.019     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Fisher B., Anderson S., Bryant J., Margolese R.G., Deutsch M., Fisher E.R., et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. NEngl J Med 2002, 347:1233-1241.
2. Veronesi U., Cascinelli N., Mariani L., Greco M., Saccozzi R., Luini A., et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. NEngl J Med 2002, 347:1227-1231.
3. Smitt M.C., Nowels K.W., Zdeblick M.J., Jeffrey S., Carlson R.W., Stockdale F.E., et al. The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long term results of breast conservation. Cancer 1995, 76:259-267.
4. Weng E.Y., Juillard G.J.F., Parker R.G., Chang H.R., Gornbein J.A. Outcomes and factors impacting local recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer 2000, 88:1643-1649.
5. Singletary S.E. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 2002, 184:383-393.
6. Ngo C., Poller A.G., Laperrelle J., Ackerman G., Gomme S., Thibault F., et al. Intraoperative ultrasound localization of nonpalpable breast cancers. Ann Surg Oncol 2007, 14:2485-2489.
7. Park C.C., Mitsumori M., Nixon A., Recht A., Connolly J., Gelman R., et al. Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. JClin Oncol 2000, 18:1668-1675.
8. Schiller D.E., Le Lw, Cho C.J., Youngsong B.J., McCready D.R. Factors associated with negative margins of lumpectomy specimen: potential use in selecting patients for intraoperative radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2008, 15:833-842.
9. Coopey S.B., Buckley J.M., Smith B.L., Hughes K.S., Gadd M.A., Specht M.C. Lumpectomy cavity shaved margins do not impact re-excision rates in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2011, 18:3036-3040.
10. Smitt M.C., Horst K. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excision biopsy of invasive cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2007, 14:1040-1044.
11. Freedman G., Fowble B., Hanlon A., Nicolaou N., Fein D., Hoffman J., et al. Patients with early stage invasive cancer with close or positive margins treated with conservative surgery and radiation have an increased risk of breast recurrence that is delayed by adjuvant systemic therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999, 44:1005-1015.
12. Davis K.M., Hsu C.H., Bouton M.E., Wilhelmson K.L., Komenaka I.K. Intraoperative ultrasound can decrease the re-excision lumpectomy rate in patients with palpable breast cancers. Am Surg 2011, 77:720-725.
13. Fisher C.S., Mushawah F.A., Cyr A.E., Gao F., Margenthaler J.A. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy for palpable breast cancers. Ann Surg Oncol 2011, 18:3198-3203.
14. Moore M.M., Whitney L.A., Cerilli L., Imbrie J.Z., Bunch M., Simpson V.B., et al. Intraoperative ultrasound is associated with clear lumpectomy margin for palpable infiltrating ductal breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2001, 233:761-768.
15. Fortunato L., Penteriani R., Farina M., Vitelli C.E., Piro F.R. Intraoperative ultrasound is an effective and preferable technique to localize non-palpable breast tumors. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008, 34:1289-1292.
16. Harlow S.P., Krag D.N., Ames S.E., Weaver D.L. Intraoperative ultrasound localization to guide surgical excision of nonpalpable breast carcinoma. JAm Coll Surg 1999, 189:241-246.
17. Olson T.P., Harter J., Munoz A., Mahvi D.M., Breslin T.M. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery resulted in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 2007, 14(10):2953-2960.
18. Barthelmes L., Awa A.A., Crawford D.J. Effect of cavity margin shavings to ensure completeness of excision on local recurrence rates following breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003, 29:644-648.
19. Klimberg V.S., Westbrook K.C., Korourian S. Use of touch preps for diagnosis andevaluation of surgical margins in breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 1998, 5(3):220-226.
20. Klimberg V.S., Harms S., Korourian S. Assessing margin status. Surg Oncol 1999, 8:77-84.
21. Valdes E.K., Boolbol S.K., Cohen J.M., Feldman S.M. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role re-excision lumpectomy?. Ann Surg Oncol 2007, 14(3):1045-1050.
22. Olsha O., Shemesh D., Carmon M., Sibirsky O., Dalo R.A., Rivkin L., et al. Resection margin in ultrasound-guided breast conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2011, 18:447-452.
23. Balch G.C., Mithani S.K., Simpson J.F., Kelley M.C. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy. Am Surg 2005, 71:22-28.
24. Rahusen F.D., Bremers A.J.A., Fabry H.F.J., van Amerongen A.H., Boom R.P., Meijer S. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancer versus wire-guided resection: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2002, 6:994-998.
25. Bennet I.C., Greenslade J., Chiam H. Intraoperative ultrasound-guided excision of nonpalpable breast lesions. World J Surg 2005, 29:369-374.
26. Kaufman C.S., Jacobson L., Bachman B., Kaufman L. Intraoperative ultrasonography guidance is accurate and efficient according to results in 100 breast cancer patients. Am J Surg 2003, 186(4):378-382.
27. Keskek M., Kothari M., Ardehali B., Betambeau N., Nasiri N., Gui G.P. Factors predisposing to cavity margin positivity following conservation surgery for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004, 30:1058-1064.
28. Horiguchi J., Lino U., Takei J., Maemura M., Yokoe T., Niibe H., et al. Surgical margin and breast recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. Oncol Rep 1999, 6:135-138.
29. Park J.S., Park Y.M., Kim E.K., Kim S.J., Han S.S., Lee S.J., et al. Sonographic findings of high-grade and non-high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. JUltrasound Med 2010, 29:1687-1697.
30. Hewes J.C., Imkampe A., Haji A., Bates T. Importance of routine cavity sampling in breast conservation surgery. Br J Surg 2009, 96(1):47-53.
31. Tengher-Barna I., Hequet D., Reboul-Marty J., Frassati-Biaggi A., Seince N., Rodrigues-Faure A., et al. Prevalence and predictive factors for the detection of carcinoma in cavity margin performed at the time of breast lumpectomy. Mod Pathol 2009, 22(2):299-305.
32. Brem R.F., Fishman M., Rapelyea J.A. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ with mammography, breast specific gamma imaging, and MRI: a comparative study. Acad Radiol 2007, 14:945-950.
33. Osborn J.B., Keeney G.L., Jakub J.W., Degnim A.C. Cost-effectiveness analysis of routine frozen-section analysis of breast margins compared with reoperation for positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol 2011, 18:3204-3209.