Ecology education when no child is left behind

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Volumn 1, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 383-390

  Blank, Lisa ^a   Brewer, Carol ^a   Lee, Okhee ^b   Luykx, Aurolyn ^b   Barker, Susan ^c   Slingsby, David ^d   Hollweg, Karen ^e   Comfort, Kathy ^f   Bybee, Rodger W ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^d BRITISH ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY   (United Kingdom)

^e Educator   (United States)

^f WestEd   (United States)

^g Biological Sciences Curriculum Study Colorado Springs   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884071976     PISSN: 15409295     EISSN: 15409309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3868191     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Feinsinger P, Margutti L, and Oviedo R. 1997. Schoolyard and nature trails: ecology education outside the university. Trends Ecol Evol 12: 115-20.
2. Feuer M, Towne L, and Shavelson RJ. 2002. Scientific culture and educational research. Educ Res 31: 4-14.
3. Grissmer DW, Flanagan A, Kawata J, and Williamson S. 2000. Improving student achievement: what state NAEP test scores tell us. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
4. Haney W. 2000. The Texas Miracle in Education. Education Policy Analysis Archives: Center for Education, Research, Analysis, and Innovation. http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n41.
5. Kilpatrick J. 2001. Where's the evidence? J Res Math Educ 32: 421-27.
6. King PM and Kitchener KS. 1994. Developing reflective judgment: understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
7. NRC (National Research Council). 2002. Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
8. USDL (US Department of Labor). 1991. Secretary's commission on achieving necessary skills. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
9. USDE (US Department of Education). 2002. No Child Left Behind Facts sheets. www.nclb.gov/start/facts/science.html.
10. Hewson PW, Kahle JB, Scantlebury K, and Davies D. 2001. Equitable science education in urban middle schools: Do reform efforts make a difference? J Res Science Teach 38: 1130-44.
11. McNeil LM. 2000. Creating new inequalities: Contradictions of reform. Phi Delta Kappan 81: 729-34.
12. Ruiz-Primo MA and Shavelson RJ. 1996. Rhetoric and reality in science performance assessments: an update. J Res Science Teach 33: 1045-63.
13. Shepard L, Taylor G, and Betebenner D. 1998. Inclusion of limited-English-proficient students in Rhode Island's grade 4 mathematics performance assessment. CSE Technical Report 486. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
14. Solano-Flores G and Trumbull E. 2003. Examining language in context: the need for new research and practice paradigms in the testing of English-language learners. Educ Res 32: 3-13.
15. Spillane JP, Diamond JB, Walker LJ, et al. 2001. Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. J Res Science Teach 38: 918-40
16. Jenkins E. 2002. The impact of the national curriculum on secondary school science teaching in England and Wales. Int J Sci Educ 22: 325-36.
17. Millar R and Osborne J. 1998. Beyond 2000: science education for the future. London, UK: Kings College.
18. AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science). 1989. Science for all Americans: a Project 2061 report on literacy goals in science, mathematics, and technology. Washington, DC: AAAS.
19. Biddle BJ. 1997. Foolish, dangerous nonsense, and real correlates of state differences in achievement. Phi Delta Kappan 79: 8-13.
20. Bransford JD, Brown AL, and Cocking R (Eds). 1999. How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21. Hollweg KS and Hill D. 2003. What is the influence of the National Science Education Standards? Reviewing the evidence, a workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
22. Kannapel PJ, Aagaard L, Coe P, and Reeves CA. 2001. The impact of standards and accountability on teaching and learning in Kentucky. In: Fuhrman, SH (Ed). From the capitol to the classroom: standards-based reform in the states. The one hundredth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education Pt 2. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. p 242-62.
23. National Research Council. 1996. The National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
24. National Research Council. 2002. Investigating the influence of standards: a framework for research in mathematics, science, and technology education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
25. Scantlebury K, Boone W, Kahle JB, and Fraser BJ. 2001. Design, validation, and use of an evaluation instrument for monitoring systemic reform. J Res Science Teach 38: 646-62.
26. Supovitz JA and Turner HM. 2000. The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. J Res Science Teach 37: 963-80.
27. Weiss IR, Pasley JD, Smith PS, et al. 2003. Looking inside the classroom: a study of K-12 mathematics and science education in the United States. www.horizon-research.com/insidetheclassroom. Viewed 10 June 2003.
28. Baxter GP and Shavelson RJ. 1994. Science performance assessments: benchmarks and surrogates. Int J Educ Res 21: 279-98.
29. Comfort KB and Michelson P. 1995. A sampler of science assessment. Sacramento: California Department of Education.
30. National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
31. Roberts LLC. 1996. Methods of evaluation for Public Understanding Program. (PhD dissertation). Berkeley, CA: University of California.
32. Shavelson RJ, Carey NB, and Webb NM. 1990. Indicators of science achievement: options for a powerful policy instrument. Phi Delta Kappan 71: 692-97.
33. Shepard LA. 1995. Using assessment to improve learning. Educ Leadership 52: 38-43.
34. Sheingold K, Heller J, and Paulukonis S. 1995. Actively seeking evidence: teacher change through assessment development. Princeton, NJ: Center for Performance Assessment, Educational Testing Services.
35. Webb N. 1997. Determining alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education. Madison, WI: National Center for Improving Science Education.
36. Adams H. 1958. The session, 1869-1870. In: Hochfield GE (Ed). The great secession winter of 1860-61 and other essays. New York: Sagamore Press, NY.
37. Brown L. 2001. Eco economy: building an economy for the earth. New York, NY: Norton & Company.
38. Bybee RW. 1997. Achieving scientific literacy from purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
39. NCSE (National Council for Science and the Environment). 2003. Education for a secure and sustainable future. Washington, DC: NCSE.
40. NCSE. 2000. Recommendations for improving the scientific basis for environmental decision making. Washington, DC: NCES.
41. NRC (National Research Council). 1996. National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
42. NSB (National Science Board). 2000. Environmental science and engineering for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
43. Wilson EO. 2002. The future of life. New York, NY: Vantage Books.