Where's the Evidence?

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 421-427

  Kilpatrick, Jeremy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035631478     PISSN: 00218251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/749702     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Carnine, D., & Gersten, R. (2000). The nature and role of research in improving achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 138-143.
2. Castle, M. N. (2000, February 2). Opening statement. In The Federal Role in K-12 Mathematics Reform: Joint Hearing Before the Subcommittees on Early Childhood, Youth and Families and on Postsecondary Education, Training and Life-Long Learning of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, 106th Cong., 2d Sess. [On-line]. Available: http://www.house.gov/ed_workforce/hearings/106th/ecyf/fuzzymath2200/oscastle.htm
3. Cheney, L. V. (1997, June 11). President Clinton's mandate for fuzzy math. The Wall Street Journal, p. A22.
4. DeMott, B. (1962). Hells and benefits: A report on American minds, matters, and possibilities. New York: Basic Books.
5. Dixon, R. C., Carnine, D. W., Lee, D.-S., Wallin, J., & Chard, D. (1998). Report to the California State Board of Education and addendum to principal report: Review of high quality experimental mathematics research [On-line]. Available: http://idea.uoregon.edu/∼ncite/documents/math/math.html
6. Ferrini-Mundy, J., & Schram, T. (Eds.). (1997). The Recognizing and Recording Reform in Mathematics Education Project: Insights, issues, and implications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph No. 8.
7. Gardner, M. (1998, September 24). The new new math. New York Review of Books, 45, 9-12.
8. Hart, K. M. (1998). Basic criteria for research in mathematics education. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity (pp. 409-413). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
9. Hiebert, J. (1999). Relationships between research and the NCTM Standards. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 3-19.
10. Jacob, B., & Akers, J. (2000, May 5). "Research based" mathematics education policy: The case of California 1995-1998. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning [On-line serial]. Available: http://www.intermep.org/
11. Kilpatrick, J. (1997). Confronting reform. American Mathematical Monthly, 104, 955-962.
12. Kilpatrick, J. (2000). Research in mathematics education across two centuries. In M. A. Clements, H. H. Tairab, & W. K. Yoong (Eds.), Science, mathematics and technical education in the 20th and 21st centuries (pp. 79-93). Gadong, Brunei: Universiti Brunei Darussalam.
13. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14. Lester, F. K., Jr., & Lambdin, D. V. (1998). The ship of Theseus and other metaphors for thinking about what we value in mathematics education research. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity (pp. 415-425). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
15. Lester, F. K., Jr., & Wiliam, D. (2000). The evidential basis for knowledge claims in mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 132-137.
16. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
17. Nissen, G., & Blomhøj, M. (Eds.). (1993). Criteria for scientific quality and relevance in the didactics of mathematics. Roskilde, Denmark: Roskilde University, IMFUFA.
18. Porter, A. C., & Smithson, J. L. (2001). Are content standards being implemented in the classroom? A methodology and some tentative answers. In S. Fuhrman (Ed.), From the capitol to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the states (One hundredth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 2, pp. 60-80). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Selection and Adoption of Elementary School Materials, § 60200.c.3, Calif. Educ. Code [On-line]. (1995). Available: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html
20. Senk, S. L., & Thompson, D. R. (Eds.). (in press). Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? Do they work? Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Stein, S. K. (1996). Strength in numbers: Discovering the joy and power of mathematics in everyday life. New York: Wiley.
22. Towne, L., Shavelson, R. J., & Feuer, M. J. (Eds.). (2001). Science, evidence, and inference in education: Report of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: http://www .nap.edu/books/030907570X/html/
23. U.S. Department of Education, Mathematics and Science Expert Panel. (1999). Exemplary and promising mathematics programs. Washington, DC: Author. Available: http://www.enc.org/professional/federalresources/exemplary/
24. Wilson, S. M., & Floden, R. E. (2001). Hedging bets: Standards-based reform in classrooms. In S. Fuhrman (Ed.), From the capitol to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the states (One hundredth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 2, pp. 193-216). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.