Successfully Combining Meta-analysis and Structural Equation Modeling: Recommendations and Strategies

Journal of Business and Psychology

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 251-261

  Landis, Ronald S ^a  

^a ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Meta analysis; Research methods; Structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883826729     PISSN: 08893268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10869-013-9285-x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modeling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 815-824.
2. Burke, M. J., & Landis, R. S. (2003). Methodological and conceptual challenges in conducting and interpreting meta-analyses. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Validity generalization: A critical review (pp. 287-309). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Card, N. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York: Guilford Press.
4. Cheung, M. W. L. (2008). A model for integrating fixed-, random-, and mixed-effects meta-analysis into structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 13, 182-202.
5. Cheung, M. W. L. (2009). TSSEM: A LISREL syntax generator for two-stage structural equation modeling (Version 1. 11) [Computer software and manual]. Retrieved from Jan 25, 2013 http://courses. nus. edu. sq/course/psycwlm/internet/tssem. zip.
6. Cheung, M. W. L., & Chan, W. (2005). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A two-stage approach. Psychological Methods, 10, 40-64.
7. Cheung, M. W. L., & Chan, W. (2009). A two-stage approach to synthesizing covariance matrices in meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 28-53.
8. Christian, M. S., Bradley, J. C., Wallace, J. C., & Burke, M. J. (2009). Workplace safety: A meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1103-1127.
9. Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000). Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 678-707.
10. Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 325-334.
11. Cortina, J. M., Chen, G., & Dunlap, W. P. (2001). Testing interaction effects in LISREL: Examination and illustration of available procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 324-360.
12. Earnest, D. R., Allen, D. G., & Landis, R. S. (2011). A meta-analytic path analysis of the mechanisms linking realistic job previews and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 64, 865-897.
13. Hoyle, R. H. (2012). Model specification in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
14. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Jackson, D. L. (2003). Revisiting sample size and number of parameter estimates: Some support for the N: q hypothesis. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 128-141.
16. Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C., & Chang, C. (2011). To aggregate or not to aggregate: Steps for developing and validating higher-order multidimensional constructs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, 241-248.
17. Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 196-217.
18. Klein, H. J., Wesson, M. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., Wright, P. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2001). The assessment of goal commitment: A measurement model meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 32-55.
19. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
20. Kline, R. B. (2012). Assumptions in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
21. MacCallum, R. C. (1986). Specification searches in covariance structure modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 107-120.
22. MacKinnon, D. P., Coxe, S., & Baraldi, A. N. (2012). Guidelines for the investigation of mediating variables in business research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 1-14.
23. Maruyama, G. M. (1998). Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Oswald, F. L., & Johnson, J. W. (1998). On the robustness, bias, and stability of statistics from meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: Some initial Monte Carlo findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 164-178.
25. Ployhart, R. E., & Ward, A. K. (2011). The "quick start guide" to conducting and publishing longitudinal research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, 413-422.
26. Preacher, K. J., & Coffman, D. L. (2006, May). Computing power and minimum sample size for RMSEA [Computer software]. Retrieved from Jan 25, 2013 http://quantpsy. org/.
27. Robbins, S. B., Oh, I., Le, H., & Button, C. (2009). Intervention effects on college performance as mediated by motivational, emotional, and social control factors: Integrated meta-analytic path analyses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1163-1184.
28. Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 543-554.
29. Silvia, E. S. M., & MacCallum, R. C. (1988). Some factors affecting the success of specification searches in covariance structure modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 297-326.
30. Stone-Romero, E. F., & Rosopa, P. J. (2008). The relative validity of inferences about mediation as a function of research design characteristics. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 326-352.
31. Tonidandel, S., & Lebreton, J. M. (2011). Relative importance analysis: A useful supplement to regression analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, 1-9.
32. Valentine, J. C., Pigott, T. D., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). How many studies do you need?: A primer on statistical power for meta-analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35, 215-247.
33. Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1995). Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel Psychology, 48, 865-885.